new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 51/100 gives this pool a live verdict of HOLD, with Enter at 46/100, Hold at 57/100, and Exit at 24/100. The automated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #53 of 3343 meteora-dlmm pools, indicating a relatively strong position within the tracked set without removing memecoin and liquidity risks. The assessment would change if TVL drained, volume fell enough to weaken fee income, or the stated APR collapsed; sustained volume with stable liquidity would support the current hold assessment.
Computed 2026-10-27 19:57 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$43.97K
Total value locked
$47.90K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up107.7%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 69.7%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a narrow, actively monitored range and set a rebalance or exit rule for a sustained drop in swap volume or a material drawdown in GOOGLX relative to SOL; fee income is the pool's stated return source, so remaining in range without sufficient flow is not a reason to stay.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 107.7% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 73.2% | — | — |
| Volume | $47.90K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $87.08 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 GOOGLx-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#173 of 4449 on meteora-dlmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1430 of 150817
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the GOOGLx-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing GOOGLX and SOL into the pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but your holdings can shift toward the token that performs worse, and the value can fall if GOOGLX loses demand or the pool becomes less active.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The Total APR of 107.7% decomposes into 73.2% from trading fees and 34.5% from rewards. Fee sustainability is 68%, so the displayed return is currently supported by trading activity rather than incentive emissions. No established reward timetable is available, so future reward changes cannot be modeled from a remaining-days estimate.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range readings are not available, so realized loss or range utilization cannot be verified from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, GOOGLX-SOL carries substantial price-dislocation risk: a sharp GOOGLX move against SOL can create inventory imbalance and impermanent loss, while lower trading activity would reduce fee income. Emission decay is not currently the main risk because the reward component is zero; exit timing should instead respond to weakening volume, worsening liquidity, or a material change in GOOGLX demand.
tollGOOGLx Context
GOOGLX is the memecoin side of this pair and is the primary source of idiosyncratic price risk for the LP. Its liquidity outside this pool is not established here, so a GOOGLX price move may be harder to absorb than a comparable SOL move; when GOOGLX appreciates or falls sharply, the pool rebalances the LP toward the relatively weaker asset.
tollSOL Context
SOL provides the more established reference asset in the pair and generally has deeper liquidity elsewhere than a memecoin such as GOOGLX. SOL price changes still affect the position: the relevant exposure is GOOGLX relative to SOL, not GOOGLX in isolation, so a stable SOL price does not prevent loss from GOOGLX volatility.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing GOOGLX and SOL into the pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but your holdings can shift toward the token that performs worse, and the value can fall if GOOGLX loses demand or the pool becomes less active.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- CmcVVxuMMCdsevwThLwU4PdESB5NxiZJU4mGrxB6QDE4
- Protocol
- Meteora DLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- GOOGLx (XsCPL9dN…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 7/31/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
6%
APR
4%
APR
5%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Emission decay has limited direct effect on the current display because reward-only APR is 34.5% and fee-only APR is 73.2%. The main APR risk is declining trading volume, which would reduce fee income.
Emission decay has limited direct effect on the current display because reward-only APR is 34.5% and fee-only APR is 73.2%. The main APR risk is declining trading volume, which would reduce fee income.
There is no reward contribution in the current APR breakdown, so expiry would not remove a currently stated reward stream. If incentives are introduced later, the reward component could fall while fee income remains dependent on trading activity.
There is no reward contribution in the current APR breakdown, so expiry would not remove a currently stated reward stream. If incentives are introduced later, the reward component could fall while fee income remains dependent on trading activity.
Risk is high relative to a pool pairing two established assets because GOOGLX can move sharply and may have thinner liquidity outside this pool. The position also depends on continued flow, even though fee sustainability is currently 68%.
Risk is high relative to a pool pairing two established assets because GOOGLX can move sharply and may have thinner liquidity outside this pool. The position also depends on continued flow, even though fee sustainability is currently 68%.
For GOOGLX-SOL, consider exiting when volume weakens materially, TVL drains, GOOGLX liquidity deteriorates, or the fee-funded APR falls enough that it no longer compensates for price and inventory risk. A persistent move that leaves the chosen range is also an exit or rebalance signal.
For GOOGLX-SOL, consider exiting when volume weakens materially, TVL drains, GOOGLX liquidity deteriorates, or the fee-funded APR falls enough that it no longer compensates for price and inventory risk. A persistent move that leaves the chosen range is also an exit or rebalance signal.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future fee flow is uncertain. With fee-only APR of 73.2%, break-even depends on that rate persisting while GOOGLX and SOL do not diverge too sharply.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future fee flow is uncertain. With fee-only APR of 73.2%, break-even depends on that rate persisting while GOOGLX and SOL do not diverge too sharply.
