new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 gives AFC-SOL a live Enter reading of 15/100, Hold reading of 20/100, and Exit reading of 80/100, with the live verdict EXIT and ai_engine=hold as the stated driver. Its rank of #343 of 997 meteora-dlmm pools places it above many listed pools but does not establish superior risk-adjusted returns; the score is consistent with a pool that can be held while fee flow persists, not an unconditional entry signal. A sustained TVL drain, a collapse in volume or fee APR, worsening price-range behavior, or the appearance and subsequent decay of unreliable incentives would change the assessment.
Computed 2026-08-24 17:31 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$79.28K
Total value locked
$0.11
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -1.5%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a range wide enough to contain the recent AFC/SOL trading band, then rebalance when price exits that band; use a fall in daily volume materially below $0 while TVL remains near $79K as a concrete signal to reassess or exit.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $0.11 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.00 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 AFC-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#971 of 2800 on meteora-dlmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 10% of all Solana pools
overall rank #9105 of 95923
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the AFC-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing AFC and SOL into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but large AFC price moves can leave you with a different mix of assets and a lower result than simply holding them.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated Total APR of 0.0% decomposes into 0.0% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 100% of yield comes from trading fees, so there is no current reward contribution to cushion weaker trading activity. Reward duration and emission schedule are not established here, so future reward changes should not be treated as a reliable source of return.
shieldRisk Assessment
A recent seven-day impermanent-loss reading and seven-day tick-in-range reading are unavailable, so recent loss experience and range utilization cannot be quantified from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, AFC-SOL carries elevated risk from sharp AFC/SOL price moves, one-sided inventory accumulation, and rapid liquidity withdrawal; emission decay and exit timing matter because any future incentive stream could decline while the token remains volatile. The absence of an established lifecycle or persistence history adds uncertainty around how long current trading activity will last.
tollAFC Context
AFC is the memecoin side of this pair and its price movement drives the LP's inventory mix relative to SOL. Liquidity depth for AFC outside this pool is not established in the supplied metrics, so a sharp AFC move or thin external markets could increase execution cost and impermanent loss; AFC appreciation or depreciation can also leave the LP holding less or more AFC than a passive wallet.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the liquid reference asset in the pair and generally provides the pool's broader market leg. SOL price changes against AFC determine the pool's active price range and the LP's relative inventory, while SOL's deeper ecosystem liquidity does not remove the separate risk of AFC-specific volatility or a thin AFC side.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing AFC and SOL into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but large AFC price moves can leave you with a different mix of assets and a lower result than simply holding them.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- Csz3Go1xa7e1YfLX3SrcSmdUt6UBzamWLjnai71CQzMC
- Protocol
- Meteora DLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- AFC (Dst93spX…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 6/24/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
2%
APR
0%
APR
28%
APR
209%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current return is 0.0%, consisting of 0.0% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, so current APR is not dependent on emissions. If rewards are introduced later, emission decay would reduce the reward portion while fee income would still depend on trading volume.
The current return is 0.0%, consisting of 0.0% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, so current APR is not dependent on emissions. If rewards are introduced later, emission decay would reduce the reward portion while fee income would still depend on trading volume.
Because the stated reward component is 0.0% and 100% of yield is fee-funded, expiration of incentives would not remove the current reward contribution, but future incentives could still be added or changed. The remaining return would be determined by trading fees, currently represented by 0.0%, and could fall if volume declines.
Because the stated reward component is 0.0% and 100% of yield is fee-funded, expiration of incentives would not remove the current reward contribution, but future incentives could still be added or changed. The remaining return would be determined by trading fees, currently represented by 0.0%, and could fall if volume declines.
Risk is high relative to a major-asset pair because AFC can move sharply, liquidity may be limited, and the pool's lifecycle and persistence are not established. LPs also face changing AFC/SOL inventory and impermanent loss, while fee income depends on the current 0.00x turnover rate.
Risk is high relative to a major-asset pair because AFC can move sharply, liquidity may be limited, and the pool's lifecycle and persistence are not established. LPs also face changing AFC/SOL inventory and impermanent loss, while fee income depends on the current 0.00x turnover rate.
For AFC-SOL, reassess when daily volume falls materially below $0, TVL drains materially from $79K, or AFC/SOL leaves the chosen range and rebalancing no longer compensates for the risk. An exit is also reasonable when the fee component falls materially below 0.0% or AFC liquidity becomes difficult to unwind.
For AFC-SOL, reassess when daily volume falls materially below $0, TVL drains materially from $79K, or AFC/SOL leaves the chosen range and rebalancing no longer compensates for the risk. An exit is also reasonable when the fee component falls materially below 0.0% or AFC liquidity becomes difficult to unwind.
There is no fixed break-even period because recent impermanent loss data is unavailable and AFC/SOL price divergence can vary substantially. At a fee-only annualized rate of 0.0%, fees could offset a modest loss over time, but a large AFC move can make break-even much longer or unattainable.
There is no fixed break-even period because recent impermanent loss data is unavailable and AFC/SOL price divergence can vary substantially. At a fee-only annualized rate of 0.0%, fees could offset a modest loss over time, but a large AFC move can make break-even much longer or unattainable.
