SOL-EMBERon Orca WhirlpoolWhirlpoolHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $13.39K
- APR
- 92.9% APR
- 24h Volume
- $2.02K 24h vol
- Pool address
- D3P1NfTw…jbyw · observed 2026-10-26
Wealthville Score
Verdict REDUCE · 60% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 39/100 places SOL-EMBER near the middle of the monitored pool set, while Enter 34/100, Hold 45/100, and Exit 50/100 indicate a hold-oriented assessment rather than a strong entry signal. The live verdict is REDUCE, with the stated verdict driver ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #202 of 3928 orca-whirlpool pools. That ranking recognizes the current fee production but does not remove memecoin, concentration, or liquidity risks. A TVL drain, sustained volume contraction, fee-yield collapse, or worsening execution conditions would weaken the assessment; durable volume with stable liquidity would support it.
Computed 2026-10-26 12:16 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$13.39K
Total value locked
$2.02K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up92.9%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 4.8%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Proceed with Caution
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a range that you can monitor actively, and rebalance or exit when the SOL/EMBER price leaves that range rather than waiting for fee APR to normalize; an out-of-range position no longer earns swaps on both sides.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 92.9% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 65.7% | — | — |
| Volume | $2.02K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $44.23 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 11 SOL-EMBER pools
by AI Farmer Score
#448 of 20205 on orca-whirlpool
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #3074 of 148664
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-EMBER liquidity pool on Orca Whirlpool. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and EMBER into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive trading fees, but the amount and mix of tokens you withdraw can change if EMBER and SOL move by different amounts or if the price leaves your chosen range.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed yield decomposes into 65.7% fee APR and 27.1% reward APR, with 71% of yield attributed to trading fees. No current reward component is contributing to the displayed APR, and the available data does not establish reward dependency or a defined emissions timetable. For this MEMECOIN pool, future emission changes matter less to the current figure than changes in swap volume, liquidity, and EMBER price activity; any later incentives should be assessed for decay and exit timing separately.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and the share of liquidity that stayed in range are not available, so the pool does not provide a measured basis for estimating recent LP efficiency or range utilization. SOL-EMBER still carries the usual concentrated-liquidity risk: EMBER can move sharply against SOL, pushing liquidity out of range and leaving the LP with a less balanced inventory. As a MEMECOIN pool, emission decay, abrupt liquidity withdrawal, and timely exit decisions are material risks even when fee revenue is currently high.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset in this pool and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than a typical memecoin. That broader liquidity can make SOL price discovery more continuous, but SOL moves still change the pool's inventory balance relative to EMBER and can create impermanent loss for the LP.
tollEMBER Context
EMBER is the pool's idiosyncratic exposure and is likely to have more concentrated liquidity and thinner market depth than SOL across the wider network. A sharp EMBER move can push a concentrated position out of range, while weak EMBER demand can reduce swap fees and make exit execution more difficult.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and EMBER into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive trading fees, but the amount and mix of tokens you withdraw can change if EMBER and SOL move by different amounts or if the price leaves your chosen range.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- D3P1NfTww6ib5bW885XypnHTho1BmtyAq9saFgfzjbyw
- Protocol
- Orca Whirlpool
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Whirlpool (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- EMBER (5dvXTZ5q…)
- Created
- 9/11/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
41%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll orca-whirlpool poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Current emissions contribute 27.1% to the displayed APR, while fees contribute 65.7% and account for 71% of yield. Because the current reward component is zero, emission decay does not currently reduce the displayed reward portion, but any future incentives would need an explicit end date and decay profile.
Current emissions contribute 27.1% to the displayed APR, while fees contribute 65.7% and account for 71% of yield. Because the current reward component is zero, emission decay does not currently reduce the displayed reward portion, but any future incentives would need an explicit end date and decay profile.
The current displayed reward APR is 27.1%, so the pool is not presently relying on farm incentives for its quoted APR. If incentives are introduced and later expire, only fee income represented by 65.7% would remain, and realized returns would depend on continuing volume and liquidity.
The current displayed reward APR is 27.1%, so the pool is not presently relying on farm incentives for its quoted APR. If incentives are introduced and later expire, only fee income represented by 65.7% would remain, and realized returns would depend on continuing volume and liquidity.
Risk is elevated because EMBER can move sharply against SOL, concentrated liquidity can leave the active range, and memecoin liquidity can retreat quickly. The pool currently shows $13K TVL, 0.15x volume relative to TVL, and total APR of 92.9%, but those figures do not cap token-price or execution risk.
Risk is elevated because EMBER can move sharply against SOL, concentrated liquidity can leave the active range, and memecoin liquidity can retreat quickly. The pool currently shows $13K TVL, 0.15x volume relative to TVL, and total APR of 92.9%, but those figures do not cap token-price or execution risk.
Consider exiting when EMBER liquidity or swap activity deteriorates, when the position leaves its chosen range and cannot be actively managed, or when fee generation no longer compensates for the token exposure. For SOL-EMBER, a falling fee component from 65.7% or a material TVL drain would be a clear reassessment signal.
Consider exiting when EMBER liquidity or swap activity deteriorates, when the position leaves its chosen range and cannot be actively managed, or when fee generation no longer compensates for the token exposure. For SOL-EMBER, a falling fee component from 65.7% or a material TVL drain would be a clear reassessment signal.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated from the available data because recent impermanent-loss and range-utilization readings are not reported. Theoretical recovery depends on realized fee income, currently represented by 65.7%, remaining high enough to offset divergence between SOL and EMBER.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated from the available data because recent impermanent-loss and range-utilization readings are not reported. Theoretical recovery depends on realized fee income, currently represented by 65.7%, remaining high enough to offset divergence between SOL and EMBER.
