new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A Wealthville Score of 47/100 with Enter 44/100, Hold 51/100, and Exit 31/100 places this pool in an avoid-oriented profile despite the ai_engine hold signal. The live verdict is HOLD, driven by risk score 76/100 and weak yield, and the pool ranks #480 of 997 meteora-dlmm pools. The assessment would improve only if sustained volume increased fee generation relative to TVL, liquidity became more persistent, and risk declined; a TVL drain, further volume loss, or fee-yield collapse would make the case weaker.
Computed 2026-08-22 06:40 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$113.38K
Total value locked
$534.82K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up500.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 233.3%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a narrow range around the current ZEC/SOL price and set a precommitted exit if price leaves the range or 4.72x deteriorates from its rendered level; do not widen the range solely to preserve fee collection.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 246.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $534.82K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $758.53 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 2 ZEC-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#154 of 2800 on meteora-dlmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #944 of 95923
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the ZEC-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing ZEC and SOL into a shared pool so other users can swap between them, while you receive a portion of swap fees. You can end up with more of one asset and less of the other when their prices move apart, and the fees may not cover that loss.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield consists of 246.0% in trading fees and 254.0% in rewards, with 49% of yield sourced from fees. The current profile is therefore fee-dependent rather than emission-dependent, and the reward schedule is not established. For this MEMECOIN pool, emission decay remains an exit-timing risk if incentives are introduced or later reduced, because the fee base is tied to only $535K of recent volume.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history and seven-day tick-in-range history are not reported, so recent range behavior cannot be verified from these metrics. The pool is classified as MEMECOIN, adding tail risk from abrupt price moves, shallow liquidity, and rapid loss of trading activity. A fee-only return of 246.0% may not compensate for adverse ZEC/SOL price divergence, and the displayed risk score is 76/100.
tollZEC Context
ZEC is the privacy-focused asset paired against SOL in this pool, so LP exposure is to both ZEC price movement and the pool's ZEC/SOL inventory conversion. Broader ZEC liquidity depth is not quantified here; if external ZEC liquidity is thin, a sharp move can widen execution impact and increase inventory imbalance. ZEC appreciation or depreciation relative to SOL can produce impermanent loss even when the pool continues generating fees.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the Solana-native settlement asset and the reference side of the ZEC/SOL pair. Its broader ecosystem liquidity is substantial, but that does not ensure deep liquidity for this specific pool. A SOL move against ZEC changes the required inventory mix and can leave the LP holding more of the weaker-performing asset after rebalancing.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing ZEC and SOL into a shared pool so other users can swap between them, while you receive a portion of swap fees. You can end up with more of one asset and less of the other when their prices move apart, and the fees may not cover that loss.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- DE99oxYZ5rYdyv2Pwyht7U5WG7jdAoCC6nrUQ8FmTPnM
- Protocol
- Meteora DLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- ZEC (A7bdiYdS…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 6/24/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
3%
APR
0%
APR
4%
APR
5%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward contribution is 254.0%, so the displayed 500.0% is presently driven by 246.0% in fees. If emissions are introduced and later decay, the APR would fall unless trading volume rises enough to replace the lost rewards.
The current reward contribution is 254.0%, so the displayed 500.0% is presently driven by 246.0% in fees. If emissions are introduced and later decay, the APR would fall unless trading volume rises enough to replace the lost rewards.
Because the current reward contribution is 254.0% and fee sustainability is 49%, incentive expiry would mainly confirm a fee-dependent return profile. If volume remains at $535K, the remaining yield would be limited to trading fees and could be insufficient for the pool's risk.
Because the current reward contribution is 254.0% and fee sustainability is 49%, incentive expiry would mainly confirm a fee-dependent return profile. If volume remains at $535K, the remaining yield would be limited to trading fees and could be insufficient for the pool's risk.
The pool is classified as MEMECOIN and carries a displayed risk score of 76/100, so risks include sharp ZEC/SOL divergence, shallow or disappearing liquidity, and weak fee generation. The 4.72x volume-to-liquidity ratio indicates limited recent trading activity relative to capital deposited.
The pool is classified as MEMECOIN and carries a displayed risk score of 76/100, so risks include sharp ZEC/SOL divergence, shallow or disappearing liquidity, and weak fee generation. The 4.72x volume-to-liquidity ratio indicates limited recent trading activity relative to capital deposited.
For this pool, an exit signal is a sustained fall in 4.72x, a TVL drain from $113K, price leaving the selected range, or fee income no longer compensating for inventory risk. Exit timing matters more for a MEMECOIN pool because activity and emissions can decay quickly.
For this pool, an exit signal is a sustained fall in 4.72x, a TVL drain from $113K, price leaving the selected range, or fee income no longer compensating for inventory risk. Exit timing matters more for a MEMECOIN pool because activity and emissions can decay quickly.
It cannot be established from the available data because seven-day impermanent-loss history is not reported and trading activity is only $535K. A nominal fee-only payback would be roughly the inverse of 246.0% in years, but that estimate assumes constant fees and no further price divergence.
It cannot be established from the available data because seven-day impermanent-loss history is not reported and trading activity is only $535K. A nominal fee-only payback would be roughly the inverse of 246.0% in years, but that estimate assumes constant fees and no further price divergence.
