new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 38/100 places this pool near the upper portion of the tracked set, ranked #76 of 2612 meteora-dlmm pools, but the component scores show a more cautious signal: Enter is 33/100, Hold is 45/100, and Exit is 35/100. The live verdict is HOLD, with verdict driver ai_engine=hold, which is consistent with a fee-led pool whose high turnover is useful but whose memecoin exposure and shallow liquidity require monitoring. The assessment would change if TVL drained, volume and fee APR collapsed, the pool became persistently out of range, or a documented reward schedule materially altered the return profile.
Computed 2026-11-10 16:48 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$10.56K
Total value locked
$127.04
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up1.8%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -13.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a range centered on the current AMZNX-SOL price, set an alert for either boundary, and rebalance or exit when the position becomes materially one-sided; also withdraw if $127 falls while $11K contracts, since fee income would then be less dependable.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 1.8% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 1.8% | — | — |
| Volume | $127.04 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.46 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 AMZNx-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#935 of 4637 on meteora-dlmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 4% of all Solana pools
overall rank #4964 of 157883
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the AMZNx-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing AMZNX and SOL into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. If AMZNX and SOL move differently, you may end up holding more of the asset that performed worse, and the position can become harder to exit when the pool is small.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed yield decomposes into 1.8% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards, with 99% of yield sustained by fees. Reward dependency and the pool's incentive lifecycle are not established, so the fee component is the more relevant basis for evaluating returns. Fee income may remain high while turnover persists, but the 0.01x Vol/TVL ratio also indicates that the current APR is sensitive to changes in volume and liquidity.
shieldRisk Assessment
A recent seven-day impermanent-loss reading and tick-in-range history are unavailable, so realized range efficiency and loss cannot be assessed from those series. The main risks are AMZNX's memecoin volatility, price divergence from SOL, and one-sided inventory after the active range is breached. As a MEMECOIN pool with unknown lifecycle and persistence, emission decay is less relevant to the current fee-only return than exit timing: an LP may need to withdraw or rebalance before liquidity becomes concentrated in the weaker asset.
tollAMZNx Context
AMZNX is the memecoin side of this pair, and its price action is likely to dominate the LP's inventory risk. Liquidity depth for AMZNX outside this pool is not established by the supplied metrics, so a sharp move can create adverse selection and make exiting more dependent on available market depth. An AMZNX rally or selloff can also move the position out of its active range and reduce fee capture.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the relatively established base asset in this pair and generally has deeper external liquidity than AMZNX. SOL price movement still matters because divergence between SOL and AMZNX changes the pool's asset mix and can create impermanent loss even when AMZNX volume is high. The pool's $11K liquidity should be evaluated against the depth available for exiting both assets, not against SOL liquidity alone.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing AMZNX and SOL into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. If AMZNX and SOL move differently, you may end up holding more of the asset that performed worse, and the position can become harder to exit when the pool is small.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- DXAbc6Q3BzfnWbJKVdVyEdLfvMprMNtxb8iz36W2ttZj
- Protocol
- Meteora DLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- AMZNx (Xs3eBt7u…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 6/24/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
2%
APR
0%
APR
3%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current return is fee-led: 1.8% comes from fees and 0.0% comes from rewards, with 99% of yield attributed to trading fees. If future emissions decline, the direct effect should be limited while fee volume persists, but the pool's reward schedule is not established.
The current return is fee-led: 1.8% comes from fees and 0.0% comes from rewards, with 99% of yield attributed to trading fees. If future emissions decline, the direct effect should be limited while fee volume persists, but the pool's reward schedule is not established.
The displayed reward component is already 0.0%, so expiration of incentives would not remove a currently visible reward contribution. The remaining return would depend on trading fees, which are tied to $127, $11K, and the pool's 0.01x turnover.
The displayed reward component is already 0.0%, so expiration of incentives would not remove a currently visible reward contribution. The remaining return would depend on trading fees, which are tied to $127, $11K, and the pool's 0.01x turnover.
Risk is elevated because AMZNX can move sharply relative to SOL, while the pool has $11K in liquidity against $127 in volume. The supplied data does not provide recent impermanent-loss or range-history readings, so the practical exposure must be monitored through price divergence, inventory imbalance, and exit liquidity.
Risk is elevated because AMZNX can move sharply relative to SOL, while the pool has $11K in liquidity against $127 in volume. The supplied data does not provide recent impermanent-loss or range-history readings, so the practical exposure must be monitored through price divergence, inventory imbalance, and exit liquidity.
Consider exiting when AMZNX becomes persistently one-sided in your position, when price approaches or breaches the active range, or when volume falls while TVL contracts. Those conditions can reduce fee capture and increase the difficulty of exiting without taking further price impact.
Consider exiting when AMZNX becomes persistently one-sided in your position, when price approaches or breaches the active range, or when volume falls while TVL contracts. Those conditions can reduce fee capture and increase the difficulty of exiting without taking further price impact.
There is no defensible fixed break-even time from the supplied data because recent impermanent-loss history and range persistence are unavailable. Fee income is currently represented by 1.8%, but the high 0.01x turnover can change quickly and does not guarantee that fees will offset price divergence.
There is no defensible fixed break-even time from the supplied data because recent impermanent-loss history and range persistence are unavailable. Fee income is currently represented by 1.8%, but the high 0.01x turnover can change quickly and does not guarantee that fees will offset price divergence.
