new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 44/100, with Enter at 39/100, Hold at 50/100, and Exit at 30/100; the live verdict is HOLD and the stated driver is ai_engine=hold. Ranked #621 of 8541 raydium-amm pools, this places RBT-SOL in a monitored hold category rather than a clear entry signal: the pool has fee-funded returns, but its small liquidity base and 0.05x trading-to-liquidity ratio limit confidence in fee persistence. A TVL drain, further volume deterioration, fee-yield collapse, or sharper RBT price divergence would weaken the assessment; sustained volume with stable liquidity would improve it.
Computed 2026-09-21 00:35 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$143.95K
Total value locked
$7.81K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up2.4%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -7.7%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with active monitoring: set a rebalance or exit alert for a material RBT/SOL move, such as twenty percent from the entry ratio, and remove liquidity if volume continues falling while TVL remains in place. Do not use a wide passive range when the fee return depends on limited recent flow.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 2.4% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 2.4% | — | — |
| Volume | $7.81K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $19.53 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 RBT-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#983 of 69219 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #2581 of 118991
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the RBT-SOL liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing RBT and SOL into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but the value of your deposit can fall relative to simply holding RBT and SOL if their prices move apart.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield consists of 2.4% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards, with 99% of yield sourced from fees. Reward dependency is not established in the supplied data, and there is currently no reward component contributing to the displayed APR; future emission changes would therefore affect the pool mainly if incentives are introduced.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading and in-range history are not available, so recent price-divergence and range-performance risk cannot be quantified from this snapshot. As a MEMECOIN pool, RBT price moves can outweigh fee income, while the absence of reward yield leaves no emissions buffer; exit timing matters if liquidity or trading activity deteriorates.
tollRBT Context
RBT is the memecoin side of this pair, so its price movement relative to SOL directly changes the asset mix an LP holds. Liquidity depth for RBT outside this pool is not established by the supplied metrics; thin external liquidity could increase execution impact and make RBT repricing harder to manage.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset paired with RBT, and its movement changes the relative value of the two assets even when RBT is unchanged in isolation. Broader SOL liquidity is generally relevant when assessing exit execution, but SOL strength or weakness can still create divergence from the pool's RBT exposure.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing RBT and SOL into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but the value of your deposit can fall relative to simply holding RBT and SOL if their prices move apart.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- DpKZKyq6Hd1twPZhdhyED19hbdrBPhMto7rv89QoZFU3
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- RBT (65nTNuJG…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
114%
APR
1%
APR
0%
APR
7%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current APR is made up of 2.4% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, so there is no reward stream currently lowering through emission decay. If incentives are added later, declining emissions would reduce the reward component while fee income would still depend on trading volume.
The current APR is made up of 2.4% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, so there is no reward stream currently lowering through emission decay. If incentives are added later, declining emissions would reduce the reward component while fee income would still depend on trading volume.
Because the current reward-only APR is 0.0%, expiry would not remove a current reward contribution from the displayed return. The remaining yield would be 2.4%, and it would depend entirely on swaps continuing through the pool.
Because the current reward-only APR is 0.0%, expiry would not remove a current reward contribution from the displayed return. The remaining yield would be 2.4%, and it would depend entirely on swaps continuing through the pool.
Risk is driven by RBT price volatility, limited pool scale at $144K, and trading activity represented by 0.05x. The supplied snapshot does not provide recent impermanent-loss or range-performance history, so those risks cannot be estimated from the available data.
Risk is driven by RBT price volatility, limited pool scale at $144K, and trading activity represented by 0.05x. The supplied snapshot does not provide recent impermanent-loss or range-performance history, so those risks cannot be estimated from the available data.
Use a falling fee rate, declining volume, a sustained TVL drain, or a large RBT/SOL move as exit signals. For this pool, an alert at a material ratio change, such as twenty percent from entry, provides a concrete review point before price divergence overwhelms 2.4%.
Use a falling fee rate, declining volume, a sustained TVL drain, or a large RBT/SOL move as exit signals. For this pool, an alert at a material ratio change, such as twenty percent from entry, provides a concrete review point before price divergence overwhelms 2.4%.
A price-based break-even period cannot be calculated without a recent impermanent-loss reading and a forecast for future RBT/SOL movement. Ignoring price changes and assuming 2.4% stays constant, a simple fee-only payback estimate is approximately one divided by 2.4% years, before compounding, range effects, or changing volume.
A price-based break-even period cannot be calculated without a recent impermanent-loss reading and a forecast for future RBT/SOL movement. Ignoring price changes and assuming 2.4% stays constant, a simple fee-only payback estimate is approximately one divided by 2.4% years, before compounding, range effects, or changing volume.
