SOL-ZEUSon Orca WhirlpoolWhirlpoolHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $112.06K
- APR
- 500.0% APR
- 24h Volume
- $1.12M 24h vol
- Pool address
- Dsxt7wUi…h8P1 · observed 2026-10-08
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 49/100 assigns Enter 47/100, Hold 52/100, and Exit 30/100, producing a live HOLD verdict from ai_engine=hold. Its rank of #1957 of 3928 orca-whirlpool pools places it around the middle of the listed pool set, not among the strongest or weakest by the available composite assessment. The hold view is consistent with fee-funded yield but limited liquidity and incomplete range and lifecycle data. A sustained TVL drain, collapse in trading volume or fee APR, worsening exit liquidity, or a material change in token risk would weaken the assessment; durable volume and deeper liquidity would support a stronger one.
Computed 2026-10-08 05:08 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$112.06K
Total value locked
$1.12M
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up500.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 912.9%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a defined active range around the current SOL-ZEUS price, and rebalance or exit when price leaves that range or when pool TVL and trading volume deteriorate materially. Do not widen the range merely to avoid a rebalance if the resulting capital efficiency and fee capture become unclear.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $1.12M | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $11.18K | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 7 SOL-ZEUS pools
by AI Farmer Score
#80 of 16330 on orca-whirlpool
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1130 of 132693
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-ZEUS liquidity pool on Orca Whirlpool. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and ZEUS into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but the value of your deposit can change as either token moves, and the small pool may be harder to exit during a sell-off.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield decomposes into 500.0% fee APR and 0.0% reward APR. 100% of yield comes from trading fees, so current returns do not depend on an active reward stream; reward dependency remains unestablished. Emission decay is therefore not currently reducing a listed reward component, but future incentives or changes in trading activity could alter the displayed APR.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss data and tick-in-range data are unavailable, so realized range efficiency and recent IL cannot be assessed from the supplied record. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-ZEUS carries high token-price divergence risk, shallow-liquidity risk, and potentially difficult exit conditions when sentiment or volume weakens. Any future emissions may decay or expire, while the current fee-only structure means LPs must evaluate exit timing against trading activity rather than assuming incentives will persist.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the network's primary asset and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than this pool. In SOL-ZEUS, SOL price movements determine one side of the LP's inventory: a sustained move in SOL relative to ZEUS can shift the position toward the weaker-performing asset and create impermanent loss.
tollZEUS Context
ZEUS is the memecoin-side asset, so its liquidity and price discovery are more dependent on this pool and other limited venues than SOL's. A sharp ZEUS move can push the position out of its active range, while declining ZEUS volume can reduce fee generation and make exiting the LP more costly.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and ZEUS into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but the value of your deposit can change as either token moves, and the small pool may be harder to exit during a sell-off.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- Dsxt7wUigQU5puH9nHjmfwnUenMycAgsFtrkfggLh8P1
- Protocol
- Orca Whirlpool
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Whirlpool (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- ZEUS (ZEUS1aR7…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
80%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll orca-whirlpool poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current return is composed of 500.0% from fees and 0.0% from rewards, so there is no listed reward component for emission decay to reduce. If incentives are introduced later, their decline would lower total APR unless trading fees increase.
The current return is composed of 500.0% from fees and 0.0% from rewards, so there is no listed reward component for emission decay to reduce. If incentives are introduced later, their decline would lower total APR unless trading fees increase.
Because the current reward-only APR is 0.0%, expiry of a reward program would not remove a currently listed reward stream. Future returns would remain primarily tied to 500.0%, trading volume, and the pool's ability to retain liquidity.
Because the current reward-only APR is 0.0%, expiry of a reward program would not remove a currently listed reward stream. Future returns would remain primarily tied to 500.0%, trading volume, and the pool's ability to retain liquidity.
Risk is elevated because ZEUS can move sharply relative to SOL, creating impermanent loss, while $112K indicates a small liquidity base. The pool's 10.02x volume-to-liquidity ratio and 100% fee sustainability describe current activity, but neither removes token-price or exit-liquidity risk.
Risk is elevated because ZEUS can move sharply relative to SOL, creating impermanent loss, while $112K indicates a small liquidity base. The pool's 10.02x volume-to-liquidity ratio and 100% fee sustainability describe current activity, but neither removes token-price or exit-liquidity risk.
Use a predefined exit signal such as price leaving your active range, a sustained decline in pool TVL or volume, or a fee APR that no longer compensates for the token-divergence risk. For SOL-ZEUS, the absence of recent range and impermanent-loss history makes monitoring live liquidity and price behavior especially important.
Use a predefined exit signal such as price leaving your active range, a sustained decline in pool TVL or volume, or a fee APR that no longer compensates for the token-divergence risk. For SOL-ZEUS, the absence of recent range and impermanent-loss history makes monitoring live liquidity and price behavior especially important.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future price paths are unknown. Fees accrue at the displayed 500.0% rate only if trading activity persists, so compare actual fee accumulation with the position's token-value divergence rather than relying on an annualized estimate.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future price paths are unknown. Fees accrue at the displayed 500.0% rate only if trading activity persists, so compare actual fee accumulation with the position's token-value divergence rather than relying on an annualized estimate.
