WealthVille
RBLX
R
ROBUX
R

RBLX-ROBUXon Raydium AMM

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $25.05K
APR
2.8% APR
24h Volume
$1.21K 24h vol
Fee tier
0.25% fee
Pool address
DuLCsBF5…bixF · observed 2026-11-08
17F · Poor

Wealthville Score

Verdict EXIT · 70% confidence

ai_engine=holdscanner=CRITICAL
How this score works →
Enter15

new capital

Hold20

keep position

Exit80

urgency to leave

The Wealthville Score of 17/100 assigns Enter 15/100, Hold 20/100, and Exit 80/100, with the live verdict EXIT and ai_engine=hold as the stated driver. Its rank of #1207 of 18146 raydium-amm pools places it well above most listed pools by rank, but the score does not remove memecoin, liquidity, or volume-dependence risk. The assessment would change if TVL drains from $25K, fee income collapses from 2.8%, trading volume falls materially, or sustained activity demonstrates that the current fee stream is durable.

Computed 2026-11-08 03:53 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$25.05K

Total value locked

$1.21K

24h volume

×0.0 turnover

Yieldhelp

trending_up

2.8%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

≈ -96.6%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

0.25% fee

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 155m agoTVL ↓1.9%
block

AI Verdict

Avoid

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

check_circleFee-driven yield: 99% of APR from trading fees
tips_and_updates

Use a narrow range only if you can monitor the position and rebalance when either token moves materially; otherwise, set a precommitted exit rule tied to a sustained fall in fee APR from 2.8%, a material decline from $25K, or a sharp reduction in trading activity.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

table_chart

Performance Breakdown

Metric24h / Day7d / Week30d / Month
Total APR2.8%——
Fee APR2.8%——
Volume$1.21K——
Fees Earned$3.03——

Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
3.4%(trailing 7d fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−100.0%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
-96.6%(drags exceed yield)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
0.05x(protocol avg 2.0x)
Fee Yield per $1 TVL / Day
$0.0001
Fee APR Sustainability
99% from trading fees(sustainable)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#1 of 1 RBLX-ROBUX pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#3307 of 97331 on raydium-amm

by AI Farmer Score

leaderboard

Top 5% of all Solana pools

overall rank #7031 of 155680

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the RBLX-ROBUX liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing RBLX and ROBUX into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a portion of trading fees. Your token amounts can change as prices move, and you may end up holding more of the token that has fallen in value.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

Yield decomposes into a fee-only APR of 2.8% and a reward-only APR of 0.0%. 99% means the displayed return is currently attributed to trading fees rather than farm emissions. No active reward duration is established, so the APR should be evaluated as volume-dependent fee income, not as a guaranteed rate.

shieldRisk Assessment

Seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history are not available for this pool, so recent loss behavior and range utilization cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, RBLX and ROBUX can move sharply or diverge from one another, while concentrated-liquidity exit timing can become difficult during a fast move. Any future emissions would also be exposed to emission decay; an LP should not assume that a temporary incentive rate will persist.

tollRBLX Context

RBLX is one side of this pool, so an LP holds exposure to RBLX while supplying the paired asset for swaps. Liquidity depth for RBLX elsewhere is not established by the supplied pool metrics; a sharp RBLX move can leave the LP with more of the depreciating asset and create impermanent loss relative to simply holding both tokens.

tollROBUX Context

ROBUX is the other side of the pair and provides the counter-exposure against which RBLX trades. Liquidity depth for ROBUX elsewhere is not established here, so thin external markets or abrupt ROBUX price changes could increase divergence, widen execution costs, and alter the LP's token composition.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing RBLX and ROBUX into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a portion of trading fees. Your token amounts can change as prices move, and you may end up holding more of the token that has fallen in value.

token

Token Details

RBLX
RBLXSolana
Explorer

RBLX is one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

ROBUX
ROBUXSolana
Explorer

ROBUX is one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
DuLCsBF5i6FWEhmjk43RpXydLV7SYf4BYccLs7Z8bixF
Protocol
Raydium AMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
—
Pool Type
AMM
Token A
RBLX (RBLXDGRD…)
Token B
ROBUX (Hdky1Lz8…)
Created
9/21/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

Current reward-only APR is 0.0%, while fee-only APR is 2.8% and 99% of yield comes from fees. If emissions are introduced later, their decay could reduce the reward component without directly changing fee income.

Current reward-only APR is 0.0%, while fee-only APR is 2.8% and 99% of yield comes from fees. If emissions are introduced later, their decay could reduce the reward component without directly changing fee income.

The reward component would fall toward zero when incentives end, but this pool currently reports reward-only APR of 0.0%. The remaining return would depend on trading fees, currently represented by 2.8% and 99%.

The reward component would fall toward zero when incentives end, but this pool currently reports reward-only APR of 0.0%. The remaining return would depend on trading fees, currently represented by 2.8% and 99%.

Risk is elevated because both assets are memecoin-related and their prices can move or diverge quickly. The position also depends on $25K of liquidity and $1K of daily volume, while recent impermanent-loss and range-history data are unavailable.

Risk is elevated because both assets are memecoin-related and their prices can move or diverge quickly. The position also depends on $25K of liquidity and $1K of daily volume, while recent impermanent-loss and range-history data are unavailable.

Consider exiting when fee income no longer compensates for price-divergence risk, when pool liquidity falls materially from $25K, or when trading activity weakens enough to reduce 2.8%. A sharp one-sided move is also a reason to reassess range exposure and exit timing.

Consider exiting when fee income no longer compensates for price-divergence risk, when pool liquidity falls materially from $25K, or when trading activity weakens enough to reduce 2.8%. A sharp one-sided move is also a reason to reassess range exposure and exit timing.

A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income varies with volume. Break-even depends on whether fees at 2.8% persist long enough to offset the position's realized and unrealized divergence loss.

A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income varies with volume. Break-even depends on whether fees at 2.8% persist long enough to offset the position's realized and unrealized divergence loss.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights