WealthVille
SOL
S
Scam
S

SOL-Scamon Raydium AMM

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $202.22K
APR
0.2% APR
24h Volume
$377.74 24h vol
Fee tier
0.25% fee
Pool address
Duz92ts5…WyqU · observed 2026-10-15
17F · Poor

Wealthville Score

Verdict EXIT · 70% confidence

ai_engine=holdscanner=CRITICAL
How this score works →
Enter15

new capital

Hold20

keep position

Exit80

urgency to leave

The Wealthville Score of 17/100 produces Enter 15/100, Hold 20/100, and Exit 80/100, with the live verdict set to EXIT by ai_engine=hold. Its rank of #730 of 8541 raydium-amm pools places it above many listed pools but does not override the pool's small TVL and limited turnover. The hold assessment would change if TVL drained, trading volume failed to sustain fee income, the displayed APR collapsed, or measurable liquidity and demand improved enough to reduce exit risk.

Computed 2026-10-15 15:03 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$202.22K

Total value locked

$377.74

24h volume

×0.0 turnover

Yieldhelp

trending_up

0.2%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

≈ -1.5%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

0.25% fee

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 272m agoTVL ↓2.1%
block

AI Verdict

Avoid

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

check_circleFee-driven yield: 100% of APR from trading fees
warningElevated risk score: 92/100
tips_and_updates

Use a deliberately monitored price range, rebalance when SOL-SCAM leaves that range or fee accrual materially slows, and exit rather than widen exposure if pool liquidity drains or swap activity stops supporting the fee-only return.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

table_chart

Performance Breakdown

Metric24h / Day7d / Week30d / Month
Total APR0.2%——
Fee APR0.2%——
Volume$377.74——
Fees Earned$0.94——

Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
0.2%(trailing 7d fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−1.7%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
-1.5%(drags exceed yield)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
0.00x(protocol avg 4.7x)
Fee Yield per $1 TVL / Day
$0.0000
Fee APR Sustainability
100% from trading fees(sustainable)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#1 of 6 SOL-Scam pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#14283 of 85203 on raydium-amm

by AI Farmer Score

leaderboard

Top 15% of all Solana pools

overall rank #20482 of 141086

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-Scam liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and SCAM into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the amount and mix of tokens you withdraw can differ from what you deposited, especially if SCAM moves sharply.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

The yield decomposes into fee-only APR of 0.2% and reward-only APR of 0.0%. Fee sustainability is 100%, so the displayed return is currently supported by trading activity rather than farm emissions. The reward schedule and dependency are not established in the supplied data, so no duration-based reward assumption is appropriate.

shieldRisk Assessment

Seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range readings are unavailable, so recent price-path damage and concentrated-liquidity range exposure cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-SCAM also carries token-specific demand and liquidity risk: emissions can decay or fail to matter, while exit timing may worsen if traders leave and liquidity thins. The low recent turnover relative to TVL makes fee income sensitive to continued speculative flow.

tollSOL Context

SOL is the established asset in this pair and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana venues than SCAM. For this LP, a SOL price move against SCAM changes the pool's inventory mix and can create impermanent loss relative to simply holding the two assets, while deeper outside liquidity can make SOL easier to trade during an exit.

tollScam Context

SCAM is the MEMECOIN side of the pair, so its liquidity is likely more venue-dependent and its price can be driven by short-lived attention. A sharp SCAM move or decline in outside demand can shift the LP toward SCAM and make withdrawal execution more costly than the headline APR suggests.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and SCAM into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the amount and mix of tokens you withdraw can differ from what you deposited, especially if SCAM moves sharply.

token

Token Details

SOL
SOLWrapped SOLSolana

Solana is a high-performance blockchain supporting builders around the world creating crypto apps that scale today.

Scam
ScamScamcoinSolana
Explorer

Scamcoin (Scam) — one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
Duz92ts5rmKU74VwnshAUDusnDkoP95wceuyRAUpWyqU
Protocol
Raydium AMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
—
Pool Type
AMM
Token A
SOL (So111111…)
Token B
Scam (9mNjA6Bi…)
Created
5/22/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

Current reward-only APR is 0.0%, while total APR is 0.2% and fee-only APR is 0.2%. Because 100% of yield comes from fees, emission decay would matter mainly if future incentives are introduced or if the displayed reward component changes.

Current reward-only APR is 0.0%, while total APR is 0.2% and fee-only APR is 0.2%. Because 100% of yield comes from fees, emission decay would matter mainly if future incentives are introduced or if the displayed reward component changes.

The supplied data shows reward-only APR of 0.0% and fee sustainability of 100%, so there is no stated reward contribution to remove at present. If incentives are later added and then expire, the remaining return would depend on trading fees and the pool's 0.00x turnover.

The supplied data shows reward-only APR of 0.0% and fee sustainability of 100%, so there is no stated reward contribution to remove at present. If incentives are later added and then expire, the remaining return would depend on trading fees and the pool's 0.00x turnover.

Risk is elevated because SCAM can move sharply, lose demand, or become harder to sell while SOL remains liquid elsewhere. The pool's $202K TVL and $378 recent volume also leave fee generation and exits dependent on a relatively small trading base.

Risk is elevated because SCAM can move sharply, lose demand, or become harder to sell while SOL remains liquid elsewhere. The pool's $202K TVL and $378 recent volume also leave fee generation and exits dependent on a relatively small trading base.

For SOL-SCAM, review the position if pool liquidity drains, swap activity no longer supports 0.2%, or SCAM demand weakens enough to make exits costly. Leaving when the chosen price range is no longer useful can also limit further exposure to a one-sided inventory.

For SOL-SCAM, review the position if pool liquidity drains, swap activity no longer supports 0.2%, or SCAM demand weakens enough to make exits costly. Leaving when the chosen price range is no longer useful can also limit further exposure to a one-sided inventory.

No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income depends on $378 volume. A theoretical recovery would require cumulative fee earnings to exceed the loss relative to holding SOL and SCAM, which is not established by 0.2% alone.

No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income depends on $378 volume. A theoretical recovery would require cumulative fee earnings to exceed the loss relative to holding SOL and SCAM, which is not established by 0.2% alone.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights