new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 45/100 produces a live HOLD verdict, with Enter at 39/100, Hold at 53/100, and Exit at 27/100; the stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold. Ranked #595 of 3343 meteora-dlmm pools, the pool is being assessed as a hold rather than a clear entry despite fee-funded yield and meaningful volume relative to TVL. The assessment would change if TVL drained, trading volume weakened, fee APR collapsed, LIT liquidity deteriorated, or new reward emissions materially altered the return profile.
Computed 2026-10-27 00:38 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$26.90K
Total value locked
$15.86K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up59.5%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 16.7%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a range that can tolerate a defined LIT move, and rebalance when LIT leaves that range; exit if pool TVL drains materially or fee generation falls enough that 46.7% no longer compensates for memecoin inventory risk.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 59.5% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 46.7% | — | — |
| Volume | $15.86K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $36.26 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 2 LIT-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#855 of 4449 on meteora-dlmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 4% of all Solana pools
overall rank #4828 of 150817
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the LIT-USDC liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing LIT and USDC into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive trading fees, but a large LIT price move can leave you holding more of the weaker asset than if you had kept the tokens separately.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 46.7% from trading fees and 12.8% from rewards, with 79% of yield sourced from fees. No reward APR is currently reported, so the stated return depends on trading activity rather than an emission schedule. Reward duration is not established, so future incentive persistence cannot be inferred.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history is not reported, and recent tick-in-range data is unavailable, leaving realized range exposure unquantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, LIT-USDC is exposed to sharp LIT price moves, which can create inventory imbalance and impermanent loss against USDC. Emission decay is not currently the main stated yield risk because rewards contribute no reported APR, but exit timing still matters if LIT liquidity or trading activity contracts.
tollLIT Context
LIT is the volatile memecoin asset in this pair, while USDC provides the quoted settlement asset. The supplied metrics do not establish LIT's liquidity depth elsewhere on Solana, so a large LIT move or thin external liquidity could worsen execution and inventory risk for LPs. If LIT rallies or falls materially, the position can accumulate more of the underperforming asset relative to simply holding both tokens.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the stable side of the pair and normally serves as the reference value for LIT pricing. USDC has broader utility across Solana venues, but this pool's usable liquidity is still constrained by its $27K TVL. When LIT moves sharply, the USDC inventory may be exchanged for LIT or depleted as arbitrageurs rebalance the pool.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing LIT and USDC into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive trading fees, but a large LIT price move can leave you holding more of the weaker asset than if you had kept the tokens separately.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- E5SKdJuuDe28e6E4Hux4dqcTmQKKH2aNRWNKsakq4JBc
- Protocol
- Meteora DLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- LIT (EicWvteV…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 7/24/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
6%
APR
4%
APR
5%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current APR is split between 46.7% in fees and 12.8% in rewards, with 79% of yield coming from fees. Because no reward APR is currently reported, emission decay is not the stated source of the pool's current return, but any future emissions could change that mix.
The current APR is split between 46.7% in fees and 12.8% in rewards, with 79% of yield coming from fees. Because no reward APR is currently reported, emission decay is not the stated source of the pool's current return, but any future emissions could change that mix.
The current figures already assign no reported APR to rewards, so expiration would not remove a reported reward component from the present yield breakdown. Fee income would remain tied to trading volume, while lower incentives could reduce future volume and fee generation.
The current figures already assign no reported APR to rewards, so expiration would not remove a reported reward component from the present yield breakdown. Fee income would remain tied to trading volume, while lower incentives could reduce future volume and fee generation.
Risk is high relative to a stable or major-token pair because LIT can move sharply and its external liquidity depth is not established here. The pool has $27K TVL, and the absence of recent impermanent-loss and range-history data makes realized LP risk difficult to quantify.
Risk is high relative to a stable or major-token pair because LIT can move sharply and its external liquidity depth is not established here. The pool has $27K TVL, and the absence of recent impermanent-loss and range-history data makes realized LP risk difficult to quantify.
Exit when LIT leaves your chosen range and the expected fees no longer justify holding the resulting inventory, or when pool TVL and trading activity deteriorate. A collapse in 46.7% or a change from the current HOLD assessment would also warrant review.
Exit when LIT leaves your chosen range and the expected fees no longer justify holding the resulting inventory, or when pool TVL and trading activity deteriorate. A collapse in 46.7% or a change from the current HOLD assessment would also warrant review.
A defensible break-even time cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range data are unavailable. Fees currently account for 79% of yield, but whether they offset future LIT price divergence depends on trading volume, the LP's range, and exit timing.
A defensible break-even time cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range data are unavailable. Fees currently account for 79% of yield, but whether they offset future LIT price divergence depends on trading volume, the LP's range, and exit timing.
