WealthVille
NLS
N
USDC
U

NLS-USDCon Raydium CLMMCLMM

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $39.77K
APR
2.7% APR
24h Volume
$5.76K 24h vol
Fee tier
0.25% fee
Pool address
E82tX47N…paoU · observed 2026-11-13
52D · Weak

Wealthville Score

Verdict HOLD · 59% confidence

ai_engine=hold
How this score works →
Enter47

new capital

Hold59

keep position

Exit23

urgency to leave

The Wealthville Score of 52/100 gives this pool a mixed assessment: Enter is 47/100, Hold is 59/100, and Exit is 23/100, producing the live verdict HOLD from the ai_engine=hold driver. Its rank of #1442 of 9963 raydium-clmm pools places it above many listed pools but does not remove the risks implied by $40K, modest trading activity, and memecoin volatility. The assessment would worsen with a TVL drain, a fall in fee APR or volume-to-liquidity activity, or persistent out-of-range liquidity; sustained volume and fee generation with deeper liquidity would support a more favorable assessment.

Computed 2026-11-13 00:34 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$39.77K

Total value locked

$5.76K

24h volume

×0.1 turnover

Yieldhelp

trending_up

2.7%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

≈ -11.4%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

0.25% fee

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 145m agoTVL ↓7.9%
schedule

AI Verdict

Wait & Monitor

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

check_circleFee-driven yield: 99% of APR from trading fees
warningElevated risk score: 68/100
tips_and_updates

Set a range that reflects NLS's expected volatility, monitor the position at each range boundary, and rebalance or exit when price reaches a boundary or fee activity no longer justifies the inventory risk.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

table_chart

Performance Breakdown

Metric24h / Day7d / Week30d / Month
Total APR2.7%——
Fee APR2.7%——
Volume$5.76K——
Fees Earned$14.40——

Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
5.2%(trailing 7d fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−16.6%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
-11.4%(drags exceed yield)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
0.14x
Fee Yield per $1 TVL / Day
$0.0004
Fee APR Sustainability
99% from trading fees(sustainable)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#1 of 2 NLS-USDC pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#1655 of 20367 on raydium-clmm

by AI Farmer Score

leaderboard

Top 13% of all Solana pools

overall rank #20266 of 157883

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the NLS-USDC liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing NLS and USDC into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the value and mix of your deposited assets can change as NLS moves in price.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

Total APR is 2.7%, composed of 2.7% fee APR and 0.0% reward APR. 99% means the stated yield is currently tied to swap activity rather than token emissions. Reward duration is not established, so emission decay cannot be used as a reliable forecast for this pool's present APR.

shieldRisk Assessment

Recent impermanent-loss history and the share of liquidity currently inside the active range are not available from the supplied pool data. As a MEMECOIN pool, NLS-USDC has substantial directional and volatility risk: a sharp NLS move can push liquidity out of range or leave the LP holding more of the declining asset. With no current reward component, exit timing should be based on fee activity, range status, and NLS price behavior rather than waiting for emissions to offset losses.

tollNLS Context

NLS is the volatile side of this pair, while USDC provides the quoted dollar side for swaps. Liquidity depth for NLS elsewhere is not established here; thin external markets would make NLS price moves more abrupt and could increase adverse selection for LPs. A sharp NLS move changes the inventory mix and can produce impermanent loss even when fee income continues.

tollUSDC Context

USDC is the dollar-denominated settlement asset against which NLS is priced in this pool. Its broader liquidity and price stability generally make it the less volatile side, but USDC-specific market or depeg risk still affects the position. When NLS falls, concentrated liquidity can leave the LP holding more NLS and less USDC.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing NLS and USDC into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the value and mix of your deposited assets can change as NLS moves in price.

token

Token Details

NLS
NLSSolana
Explorer

NLS is one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

USDC
USDCUSD CoinSolana

USDC is a fully collateralized US dollar stablecoin. USDC is the bridge between dollars and trading on exchanges.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
E82tX47NsyMBehtUxX7n4XnwgMtCcKpZZnhQgSjvpaoU
Protocol
Raydium CLMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
—
Pool Type
Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
Token A
NLS (B9Vhg6Xr…)
Token B
USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
Created
8/28/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

The current APR is 2.7%, split between 2.7% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, so emissions are not currently contributing to the stated yield. If rewards are added later, emission decay would reduce the reward portion without directly changing fee income.

The current APR is 2.7%, split between 2.7% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, so emissions are not currently contributing to the stated yield. If rewards are added later, emission decay would reduce the reward portion without directly changing fee income.

The current reward APR is 0.0%, so there is no present reward component to remove from the stated yield. If incentives are introduced and later expire, the remaining APR would be primarily the 2.7% generated by trading fees, assuming volume persists.

The current reward APR is 0.0%, so there is no present reward component to remove from the stated yield. If incentives are introduced and later expire, the remaining APR would be primarily the 2.7% generated by trading fees, assuming volume persists.

Risk is high relative to a stablecoin pair because NLS can move sharply, changing both the position's value and its NLS-USDC inventory mix. The pool's $40K and 0.14x indicate that fee income depends on a relatively small liquidity base and continued trading.

Risk is high relative to a stablecoin pair because NLS can move sharply, changing both the position's value and its NLS-USDC inventory mix. The pool's $40K and 0.14x indicate that fee income depends on a relatively small liquidity base and continued trading.

Consider exiting when NLS reaches a range boundary, trading activity weakens enough that 2.7% no longer compensates for inventory risk, or the pool's $40K begins to drain. A sharp NLS move or a worsening fee trend is more relevant than waiting for rewards, since 0.0% is currently the reward component.

Consider exiting when NLS reaches a range boundary, trading activity weakens enough that 2.7% no longer compensates for inventory risk, or the pool's $40K begins to drain. A sharp NLS move or a worsening fee trend is more relevant than waiting for rewards, since 0.0% is currently the reward component.

A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated without recent impermanent-loss history and a stable estimate of fee income. With total APR of 2.7% and 99%, break-even depends on continued trading fees and whether NLS returns toward the price relationship at which the position was opened.

A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated without recent impermanent-loss history and a stable estimate of fee income. With total APR of 2.7% and 99%, break-even depends on continued trading fees and whether NLS returns toward the price relationship at which the position was opened.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights