Wealthville Score
Verdict EXIT · 70% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 6/100, with Enter at 8/100, Hold at 4/100, and Exit at 97/100; the live verdict is EXIT and the stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold. Its rank is #1402 of 24532 raydium-amm pools, which places it above many listed pools but does not establish that the fee rate is durable. The hold assessment is consistent with a pool generating fees from substantial turnover relative to its liquidity while lacking confirmed reward, IL, range, lifecycle, and persistence data. A TVL drain, sustained volume contraction, or collapse in fee APR would weaken the assessment; persistent volume with stable liquidity and usable risk-history data would strengthen it.
Computed 2026-11-09 10:16 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$30.04K
Total value locked
$11.93K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up24.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -69.9%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a predefined volume-based exit rule: close or materially reduce the position if pool volume falls enough that the 0.40x turnover ratio no longer supports the observed fee rate, rather than waiting for the displayed APR to update after liquidity has already drained.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 24.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 21.5% | — | — |
| Volume | $11.93K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $29.83 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 INJ-NOX pools
by AI Farmer Score
#14019 of 97331 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 13% of all Solana pools
overall rank #20113 of 155680
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the INJ-NOX liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing INJ and NOX into a shared pool used by traders, then receiving a share of trading fees. You can end up with more of one token and less of the other if their prices move differently, and the fee rate can fall if trading slows.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed Total APR is decomposed into 21.5% from trading fees and 2.5% from rewards. Fee sustainability is 90%, so the current return is tied to realized pool volume rather than emissions. Reward dependency is unknown, and no time-bound reward schedule is established in the available data; the fee APR should therefore not be treated as a fixed forward return.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss data and the seven-day tick-in-range reading are unavailable, so current range efficiency and realized IL cannot be assessed from those measures. As a MEMECOIN pool, INJ-NOX is exposed to rapid changes in attention, price dispersion, and swap volume; emission decay or an incentive withdrawal would matter because fee generation may not persist after speculative activity fades. Exit timing is therefore more important than assuming the current fee rate continues.
tollINJ Context
INJ is the network token of Injective and serves as one side of this pool, so LP returns depend on both INJ price changes and NOX price changes. INJ generally has deeper liquidity across Solana and other venues than a small memecoin, but that does not remove the risk of inventory imbalance when NOX moves sharply. A strong relative move in INJ can leave the LP holding more NOX, while a strong NOX move can produce the opposite inventory shift.
tollNOX Context
NOX is the memecoin side of the pair and is likely to contribute more of the pool's idiosyncratic price and liquidity risk. Its liquidity depth outside this pool should be verified before entering, because thin external liquidity can amplify slippage and make rebalancing costly. A sharp NOX move relative to INJ can increase impermanent loss and change the pool's asset composition quickly.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing INJ and NOX into a shared pool used by traders, then receiving a share of trading fees. You can end up with more of one token and less of the other if their prices move differently, and the fee rate can fall if trading slows.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- EbyELGck1yPbTd2ZH9jeBJgNrUhcTBXFTM9Nuo66yyJw
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- INJ (1NJMqVM4…)
- Token B
- NOX (Hht3ozgb…)
- Created
- 10/19/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
8%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current return is reported as 24.0%, split into 21.5% in fees and 2.5% in rewards. Because reward dependency is unknown and the reported reward component is zero, emission decay is not the current source of the displayed APR; any future emissions could still change the mix.
The current return is reported as 24.0%, split into 21.5% in fees and 2.5% in rewards. Because reward dependency is unknown and the reported reward component is zero, emission decay is not the current source of the displayed APR; any future emissions could still change the mix.
The pool currently reports 2.5% from rewards, so expiration would not directly remove the displayed reward component. The larger risk is that reduced incentives lower trading activity, causing 21.5% and the total return to decline if fee-generating volume does not remain strong.
The pool currently reports 2.5% from rewards, so expiration would not directly remove the displayed reward component. The larger risk is that reduced incentives lower trading activity, causing 21.5% and the total return to decline if fee-generating volume does not remain strong.
Risk is elevated because NOX can experience sharp price moves and thinner external liquidity than INJ. The pool's fee-driven return can offset some losses, but recent impermanent-loss and range data are unavailable, so the protection provided by fees cannot be quantified from the available history.
Risk is elevated because NOX can experience sharp price moves and thinner external liquidity than INJ. The pool's fee-driven return can offset some losses, but recent impermanent-loss and range data are unavailable, so the protection provided by fees cannot be quantified from the available history.
Use a predefined trigger tied to falling pool activity, weakening liquidity, or a sharp change in the INJ-to-NOX price relationship. For this pool, a sustained reduction from the 0.40x turnover profile or a material decline in 21.5% is a clearer exit signal than the headline APR alone.
Use a predefined trigger tied to falling pool activity, weakening liquidity, or a sharp change in the INJ-to-NOX price relationship. For this pool, a sustained reduction from the 0.40x turnover profile or a material decline in 21.5% is a clearer exit signal than the headline APR alone.
It cannot be calculated reliably from the available data because recent IL history, tick-range history, and future price paths are not established. Even with 21.5% in fees, break-even depends on how long that fee rate persists and whether INJ and NOX later converge in price performance.
It cannot be calculated reliably from the available data because recent IL history, tick-range history, and future price paths are not established. Even with 21.5% in fees, break-even depends on how long that fee rate persists and whether INJ and NOX later converge in price performance.
