WealthVille
BURNIE
B
SOL
S

BURNIE-SOLon Meteora DLMMHigh Yield

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $94.80K
APR
500.0% APR
24h Volume
$62.90K 24h vol
Pool address
EgGACLzNLUCJ · observed 2026-08-03
58C · Fair

Wealthville Score

Verdict HOLD · 53% confidence

ai_engine=hold
How this score works →
Enter51

new capital

Hold65

keep position

Exit16

urgency to leave

The Wealthville Score is 58/100, with Enter at 51/100, Hold at 65/100, and Exit at 16/100; the live verdict is HOLD. Its #253 of 997 ranking places it above many tracked meteora-dlmm pools but does not remove memecoin or liquidity risks. The stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold, so the assessment would change if TVL drained, trading volume weakened, or fee APR collapsed; sustained fee generation with stable liquidity would support the current hold view.

Computed 2026-08-03 09:30 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$94.80K

Total value locked

$62.90K

24h volume

×0.7 turnover

Yieldhelp

trending_up

500.0%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

129.1%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 17m agoTVL 9.5%
schedule

AI Verdict

Wait & Monitor

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

tips_and_updates

Enter with a range centered on the current BURNIE-SOL price, monitor the position at each range boundary, and rebalance or exit when price leaves the range or fee generation no longer compensates for the resulting inventory imbalance.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

table_chart

Performance Breakdown

Metric24h / Day7d / Week30d / Month
Total APR500.0%
Fee APR227.0%
Volume$62.90K
Fees Earned$594.91

Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
229.1%(trailing 24h fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−100.0%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
129.1%(after IL + repositioning)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
0.66x
Fee Yield per $1 TVL / Day
$0.0063
Fee APR Sustainability
45% from trading fees(reward-dependent)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#3 of 3 BURNIE-SOL pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#267 of 2392 on meteora-dlmm

by AI Farmer Score

leaderboard

Top 2% of all Solana pools

overall rank #1027 of 78790

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the BURNIE-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing BURNIE and SOL into the pool so other users can trade between them. You receive trading-fee income, but the amount and mix of tokens you withdraw can differ from what you deposited if either price moves sharply.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

The yield decomposes into 227.0% fee APR and 273.0% reward APR, with 45% of yield sourced from trading fees. That makes the quoted APR dependent on trading activity rather than a disclosed incentive stream; a reward-duration estimate is not established for this pool.

shieldRisk Assessment

Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range readings are not available, so current range efficiency and realized IL cannot be assessed from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, BURNIE-SOL carries substantial price-dislocation risk, while emissions can decay and liquidity can leave quickly; the pool's lifecycle and exit timing are not established.

tollBURNIE Context

BURNIE is the memecoin side of this pair, so its price movement relative to SOL determines much of the LP's inventory shift and impermanent-loss exposure. Liquidity depth for BURNIE outside this pool is not established in the supplied data; thinner external liquidity could make price moves and exits more disruptive.

tollSOL Context

SOL provides the quoted asset in the pair and is the reference against which BURNIE's performance is measured. SOL's broader market liquidity can support execution, but a sharp SOL move still changes the pair price and can leave an LP holding more of the weaker-performing asset.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing BURNIE and SOL into the pool so other users can trade between them. You receive trading-fee income, but the amount and mix of tokens you withdraw can differ from what you deposited if either price moves sharply.

token

Token Details

BURNIE
BURNIEBurnie SendersSolana
Explorer

Burnie Senders (BURNIE) — one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

SOL
SOLWrapped SOLSolana

Solana is a high-performance blockchain supporting builders around the world creating crypto apps that scale today.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
EgGACLzNtvTWfjWopkMbbcRsUPAaSCcgPjbNqUCcLUCJ
Protocol
Meteora DLMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
Pool Type
AMM
Token A
BURNIE (CGEDT9QZ…)
Token B
SOL (So111111…)
Created
5/22/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

The current APR is split between 227.0% in fees and 273.0% in rewards, so the quoted yield is presently fee-led. Any future emission decay would mainly affect the reward component, while fee APR would continue to depend on trading volume.

The current APR is split between 227.0% in fees and 273.0% in rewards, so the quoted yield is presently fee-led. Any future emission decay would mainly affect the reward component, while fee APR would continue to depend on trading volume.

The available figures already show 273.0% reward APR and 45% fee-funded yield, so expiration of incentives would not remove the stated source of current yield. Future returns would still depend on fees generated from the pool's $63K volume and $95K liquidity.

The available figures already show 273.0% reward APR and 45% fee-funded yield, so expiration of incentives would not remove the stated source of current yield. Future returns would still depend on fees generated from the pool's $63K volume and $95K liquidity.

Risk is elevated because BURNIE can experience sharp price moves and liquidity conditions can change quickly. The pool's current $95K TVL and 0.66x volume-to-TVL ratio describe activity, but recent IL and range-retention readings are not available to quantify the price risk.

Risk is elevated because BURNIE can experience sharp price moves and liquidity conditions can change quickly. The pool's current $95K TVL and 0.66x volume-to-TVL ratio describe activity, but recent IL and range-retention readings are not available to quantify the price risk.

For BURNIE-SOL, consider exiting when price leaves your active range, pool liquidity falls materially, or fee income no longer compensates for holding an increasingly one-sided inventory. A sharp BURNIE move or a collapse in 227.0% would be a concrete reassessment trigger.

For BURNIE-SOL, consider exiting when price leaves your active range, pool liquidity falls materially, or fee income no longer compensates for holding an increasingly one-sided inventory. A sharp BURNIE move or a collapse in 227.0% would be a concrete reassessment trigger.

A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because the pool lacks a recent IL reading and fee realization varies with volume. The theoretical comparison should use 227.0% as the fee-income rate, but actual recovery depends on future trading activity, price paths, and whether liquidity remains in range.

A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because the pool lacks a recent IL reading and fee realization varies with volume. The theoretical comparison should use 227.0% as the fee-income rate, but actual recovery depends on future trading activity, price paths, and whether liquidity remains in range.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights