SOL-XINon Raydium CLMMCLMMActive
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $110.79K
- APR
- 23.0% APR
- 24h Volume
- $6.01K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 1.00% fee
- Pool address
- EpUB3i6i…jdQs · observed 2026-08-23
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 53/100, with Enter at 47/100, Hold at 60/100, Exit at 21/100, and the live verdict HOLD. That HOLD assessment is consistent with a middle-ranked pool at #507 of 1157 raydium-clmm pools: it is not being treated as an immediate entry or exit, while its fee-funded structure provides a measurable basis for returns but its low trading activity limits confidence in persistence. The verdict driver is ai_engine=hold. A sustained TVL drain, further volume contraction, fee-yield collapse, or worsening XIN liquidity would shift the assessment toward exit; durable volume growth and deeper liquidity could support a stronger entry view.
Computed 2026-08-23 04:58 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$110.79K
Total value locked
$6.01K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up23.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 5.6%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a deliberately narrow, actively monitored range and set a rebalance or exit rule for a material XIN move against SOL; if the position leaves range or swap activity falls while liquidity is being withdrawn, close or reposition instead of waiting for emissions that are not currently documented.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 23.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 20.7% | — | — |
| Volume | $6.01K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $60.12 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 3 SOL-XIN pools
by AI Farmer Score
#411 of 12650 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #2372 of 95923
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-XIN liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and XIN into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the swap fees, but price changes can leave you holding more of the weaker token and make the position worth less than simply holding both assets.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 20.7% from swap fees and 2.3% from rewards. 90% of the displayed yield is fee-funded, so returns depend on continued SOL-XIN trading rather than a reward stream. Reward dependency and any emission timetable are not established in the supplied pool data; if incentives are later introduced or decay, the displayed APR could change without a corresponding increase in trading activity.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range readings are not available, so the recent price-path and range-utilization risks cannot be quantified from this sheet. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-XIN is exposed to abrupt XIN repricing, thinner liquidity during selloffs, and fee-income deterioration when trading stops. Emission decay is an additional risk if incentives are added: an LP should assess exit timing before emissions fall or liquidity leaves, rather than treating the current fee rate as durable.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established asset in this pair and generally has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana venues than XIN. SOL price moves change the relative SOL-XIN price, which can move a concentrated LP position out of range or increase impermanent loss even when SOL itself remains liquid elsewhere.
tollXIN Context
XIN is the memecoin side of the pair, so its liquidity and price discovery are more dependent on this pool and other limited venues. A sharp XIN move against SOL can concentrate the LP into the declining asset, while a collapse in XIN trading can reduce fee income and make exit execution more difficult.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and XIN into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the swap fees, but price changes can leave you holding more of the weaker token and make the position worth less than simply holding both assets.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- EpUB3i6iDYQ9FtQ8AwHYtUH7JoMFZyM3aeYC5etsjdQs
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- XIN (4s4H5v4T…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
This pool currently shows 2.3% in reward APR and 20.7% in fee APR, with 90% of yield from fees. If any future SOL-XIN incentives decay, the total APR would fall unless trading fees increase enough to offset them.
This pool currently shows 2.3% in reward APR and 20.7% in fee APR, with 90% of yield from fees. If any future SOL-XIN incentives decay, the total APR would fall unless trading fees increase enough to offset them.
The reward component would move toward zero, leaving fee income as the economic basis for the position. Because the current reward dependency and timetable are not established, an expiry should be evaluated against trading activity and the 0.05x ratio rather than assumed to be replaced.
The reward component would move toward zero, leaving fee income as the economic basis for the position. Because the current reward dependency and timetable are not established, an expiry should be evaluated against trading activity and the 0.05x ratio rather than assumed to be replaced.
Risk is high because XIN can move sharply against SOL, liquidity can thin quickly, and the pool's fee income depends on trading. The current Total APR is 23.0%, but that figure does not protect an LP from impermanent loss or from difficult exit execution.
Risk is high because XIN can move sharply against SOL, liquidity can thin quickly, and the pool's fee income depends on trading. The current Total APR is 23.0%, but that figure does not protect an LP from impermanent loss or from difficult exit execution.
Use predefined triggers such as XIN losing its trading liquidity, the position leaving its chosen range, or fee income no longer compensating for price risk. For SOL-XIN, a TVL drain or weaker volume relative to $111K should be treated as an exit signal rather than waiting for uncertain emissions.
Use predefined triggers such as XIN losing its trading liquidity, the position leaving its chosen range, or fee income no longer compensating for price risk. For SOL-XIN, a TVL drain or weaker volume relative to $111K should be treated as an exit signal rather than waiting for uncertain emissions.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income varies with trading. At the displayed fee rate of 20.7%, fees may offset a small price divergence over time, but a large XIN move can make break-even substantially longer or unattainable.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income varies with trading. At the displayed fee rate of 20.7%, fees may offset a small price divergence over time, but a large XIN move can make break-even substantially longer or unattainable.
