new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A Wealthville Score of 17/100 with Enter 15/100 / Hold 20/100 / Exit 80/100 indicates that the pool does not presently clear the stated entry or hold thresholds, and the live verdict is EXIT. Its #699-of-2403 rank among raydium-amm pools places it below most ranked alternatives, consistent with the unopposed strong EXIT signal, critical scanner status, and weak activity profile. The assessment would improve if TVL and volume rose together, fee yield increased without relying on emissions, the scanner cleared its critical status, or a verified operating history showed sustained range use; a TVL drain or further yield collapse would strengthen the exit case.
Computed 2026-07-24 06:20 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$111.29K
Total value locked
$1.06K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.8%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -16.5%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
An LP entering this pool should use a narrow, actively monitored range and set a hard exit rule if the scanner remains CRITICAL while 0.01x fails to improve, rather than waiting for rewards to compensate for reduced trading activity.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.8% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.8% | — | — |
| Volume | $1.06K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $2.65 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 GDTC-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#15824 of 34958 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 30% of all Solana pools
overall rank #19729 of 66494
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the GDTC-SOL liquidity pool on raydium-amm. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing GDTC and SOL into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. In return, you receive a share of trading fees, but price changes can leave you with more of the weaker-performing token and the current return is low.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated Total APR of 0.8% decomposes into 0.8% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. Fee sustainability is 100%. Reward dependency and the remaining reward schedule are not established, so the fee component is the more reliable basis for evaluating returns; at this activity level, the pool is primarily routed for swaps, not LP yield.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history are unavailable, so realized loss behavior and range utilization cannot be assessed from the supplied record. As a MEMECOIN pool, GDTC is exposed to sharp price divergence, liquidity withdrawal, and rapid changes in swap demand relative to SOL. Its emission lifecycle is unknown; any future reward decay or incentive expiry would remove support that is not currently reflected in the fee-only return, making exit timing more important if volume weakens or the scanner remains critical.
tollGDTC Context
GDTC is the memecoin side of this pair, so its price movement determines how much GDTC exposure an LP accumulates or sells through rebalancing. No verified figure for GDTC liquidity depth elsewhere is supplied; thin external liquidity would increase execution risk and make abrupt GDTC price moves more consequential for this LP than the stated APR suggests.
tollSOL Context
SOL provides the more established reference asset in the pair, but SOL price changes still create divergence against GDTC and can produce inventory shifts for the LP. SOL has broader market usage than this pool, while this pool itself has limited observed activity; a SOL move without matching GDTC demand can leave the position holding a less liquid GDTC allocation.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing GDTC and SOL into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. In return, you receive a share of trading fees, but price changes can leave you with more of the weaker-performing token and the current return is low.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- EzJtx66sJEt3pcqLDf8nFYwY66T7RGAHqBv87n42EoMy
- Protocol
- raydium-amm
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- GDTC (DVb1znJK…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
open_in_newView all raydium-amm pools →By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
This is a MEMECOIN pool with an unknown emission lifecycle and 0.0% reward-only APR. If emissions decay, the fee-only component of 0.8%, currently 0.8%, is the remaining reference for yield.
This is a MEMECOIN pool with an unknown emission lifecycle and 0.0% reward-only APR. If emissions decay, the fee-only component of 0.8%, currently 0.8%, is the remaining reference for yield.
The reward component would fall away, but this pool currently reports 0.0% reward-only APR and 100% fee sustainability. After expiry, returns would depend mainly on trading fees generated by $1K volume against $111K of liquidity.
The reward component would fall away, but this pool currently reports 0.0% reward-only APR and 100% fee sustainability. After expiry, returns would depend mainly on trading fees generated by $1K volume against $111K of liquidity.
Risk is elevated because GDTC can move sharply against SOL, while recent impermanent-loss and range-use history is unavailable. The pool also has 0.01x turnover and a live verdict of EXIT, so low fee production and liquidity changes may matter more than the stated 0.8%.
Risk is elevated because GDTC can move sharply against SOL, while recent impermanent-loss and range-use history is unavailable. The pool also has 0.01x turnover and a live verdict of EXIT, so low fee production and liquidity changes may matter more than the stated 0.8%.
For this pool, an exit is more defensible if the scanner remains CRITICAL, volume weakens, TVL drains, or the live verdict remains EXIT. Do not rely on rewards to delay an exit when fee production is only 0.8% and the pool's emission lifecycle is unknown.
For this pool, an exit is more defensible if the scanner remains CRITICAL, volume weakens, TVL drains, or the live verdict remains EXIT. Do not rely on rewards to delay an exit when fee production is only 0.8% and the pool's emission lifecycle is unknown.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee production is limited to 0.8% within 0.8% total APR. Break-even would require accumulated fees to offset the position's realized divergence loss, and the current activity profile does not establish that this will happen within a predictable period.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee production is limited to 0.8% within 0.8% total APR. Break-even would require accumulated fees to offset the position's realized divergence loss, and the current activity profile does not establish that this will happen within a predictable period.
