USELESS-USEFULon Raydium CLMMCLMMActive
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $51.53K
- APR
- 35.9% APR
- 24h Volume
- $5.45K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 1.00% fee
- Pool address
- FZuTAARD…ap2R · observed 2026-11-11
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 44/100, with Enter at 38/100, Hold at 51/100, and Exit at 29/100; the live verdict is HOLD, driven by ai_engine=hold. The pool ranks #1721 of 9963 raydium-clmm pools, placing it above many listed pools but not indicating that its fee rate is durable or that its range is currently efficient. The Hold assessment is consistent with fee-funded returns and limited liquidity being worth monitoring rather than treating the pool as a clear entry signal. A TVL drain, sustained volume contraction, or collapse in 30.7% would weaken the assessment, while deeper liquidity and persistent fee generation would strengthen it.
Computed 2026-11-11 05:04 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$51.53K
Total value locked
$5.45K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up35.9%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 38.9%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a defined narrow range only if you can monitor it, and rebalance or exit when price reaches either outer tick; also set an exit trigger if 0.11x declines materially or 30.7% no longer compensates for the resulting inventory risk.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 35.9% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 30.7% | — | — |
| Volume | $5.45K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $54.87 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 USELESS-USEFUL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#860 of 20367 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 5% of all Solana pools
overall rank #7149 of 157883
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the USELESS-USEFUL liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing USELESS and USEFUL into a trading range so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but large price changes can leave you holding more of the token that performed worse, and the position may stop earning fees if price moves outside the range.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield decomposes into 30.7% fee APR and 5.2% reward APR. 85% of the reported yield comes from trading fees, so APR depends on continued swap volume and the pool's liquidity position rather than farm emissions. Reward dependency is not established in the supplied metrics; the fee component should therefore be treated as variable rather than guaranteed.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range data are unavailable, so the historical cost of holding this range and its recent capital efficiency cannot be quantified from the supplied metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, USELESS and USEFUL can experience sharp, weakly correlated price moves that change the LP's token mix and may leave the position concentrated in the declining asset. Emission decay is less central while rewards contribute no reported APR, but exit timing still matters if trading volume, fees, or liquidity deteriorate.
tollUSELESS Context
USELESS is one side of the concentrated-liquidity position, so an LP holds exposure to its price relative to USEFUL and supplies inventory across a selected tick range. Liquidity depth for USELESS elsewhere is not established by these pool metrics; thin external markets can increase price impact and make rebalancing or exiting more costly. A sharp USELESS move can push the position toward USELESS inventory or trigger range depletion.
tollUSEFUL Context
USEFUL is the counter-asset paired with USELESS, and its relative price determines how the LP's inventory is redistributed as trades cross the range. Its liquidity depth outside this pool is not established here, so external exit conditions and price impact require separate verification. A sharp USEFUL move can similarly concentrate the position in USEFUL or move it outside the active range.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing USELESS and USEFUL into a trading range so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but large price changes can leave you holding more of the token that performed worse, and the position may stop earning fees if price moves outside the range.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- FZuTAARDYJapX7HqniQEzzDboNY8RT4FXCrakVFJap2R
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- USELESS (Dz9mQ9Nz…)
- Token B
- USEFUL (GWTP6M5b…)
- Created
- 9/7/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Emission decay would reduce 5.2% if rewards were being distributed, but the reported yield is currently represented by 30.7% in fees and 85% fee sustainability. The main APR risk is therefore falling trading activity rather than a scheduled reward reduction.
Emission decay would reduce 5.2% if rewards were being distributed, but the reported yield is currently represented by 30.7% in fees and 85% fee sustainability. The main APR risk is therefore falling trading activity rather than a scheduled reward reduction.
Any incentive component would fall as emissions end, but 5.2% currently represents no reported reward contribution. The remaining return would depend on 30.7%, which requires continued trading volume against the pool's $52K.
Any incentive component would fall as emissions end, but 5.2% currently represents no reported reward contribution. The remaining return would depend on 30.7%, which requires continued trading volume against the pool's $52K.
The risk is high relative to a less volatile pair because both tokens can move sharply and their external liquidity is not established by these pool metrics. Seven-day impermanent-loss and range-utilization history is unavailable, so the size and frequency of recent LP losses cannot be measured here.
The risk is high relative to a less volatile pair because both tokens can move sharply and their external liquidity is not established by these pool metrics. Seven-day impermanent-loss and range-utilization history is unavailable, so the size and frequency of recent LP losses cannot be measured here.
Exit when price reaches an outer tick, when the position becomes dominated by the weaker token, or when fee generation no longer justifies the range and liquidity risk. For this pool, a sustained decline in 0.11x, 30.7%, or $52K is a concrete deterioration signal.
Exit when price reaches an outer tick, when the position becomes dominated by the weaker token, or when fee generation no longer justifies the range and liquidity risk. For this pool, a sustained decline in 0.11x, 30.7%, or $52K is a concrete deterioration signal.
No defensible break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range-time data are unavailable. 30.7% is an annualized estimate rather than a fixed payout, so recovery depends on future volume, price paths, and how long the position remains in range.
No defensible break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range-time data are unavailable. 30.7% is an annualized estimate rather than a fixed payout, so recovery depends on future volume, price paths, and how long the position remains in range.
