new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 places SOL-AWR in a mixed position: Enter is 15/100, Hold is 20/100, and Exit is 80/100. The live verdict is EXIT, with the stated verdict driver of ai_engine=hold, indicating that the model does not currently identify a strong entry or exit case. Its rank of #718 of 24532 raydium-amm pools places it above most listed pools by that ranking, but the score should not be read as a guarantee of liquidity or return quality. A material TVL drain, weaker trading activity, or collapse in fee APR would change the assessment toward exit; sustained volume growth with stable liquidity would support a more favorable reassessment.
Computed 2026-10-26 18:17 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$109.03K
Total value locked
$1.32K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.6%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -3.6%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Set a price range around the current SOL/AWR exchange rate and rebalance only when price leaves that range; treat a sustained deterioration in 0.01x or a visible decline in pool liquidity as an exit signal rather than waiting for fee APR to fully reset.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.6% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.6% | — | — |
| Volume | $1.32K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $3.29 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 3 SOL-AWR pools
by AI Farmer Score
#4322 of 93745 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 6% of all Solana pools
overall rank #8960 of 150817
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-AWR liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and AWR into a shared pool used by traders. You receive part of the trading fees, but the amounts of SOL and AWR you can withdraw change as their prices move, and the memecoin may be difficult to sell during a sharp decline.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The quoted yield consists of 0.6% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 100% of yield comes from trading fees, so the return does not currently depend on an active reward allocation. Because reward dependency is not established for this pool, future emission duration cannot be assessed; any fee decline would flow directly into the total APR.
shieldRisk Assessment
A recent impermanent-loss reading and range-occupancy reading are not reported, so the pool's realized IL and time spent within range cannot be quantified from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-AWR carries the specific risk of rapid AWR price repricing, thin exit liquidity, and fee deterioration when attention moves elsewhere. Emission decay is less relevant while reward yield is absent, but exit timing still matters because a drop in volume or liquidity can reduce fee income and make position unwinding more costly.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established, more liquid side of this pair and has deeper markets across Solana, which generally makes its price easier to reference and hedge. For this LP, a sharp SOL move against AWR changes the pool composition and can increase divergence from simply holding the two assets, even when SOL itself remains liquid elsewhere.
tollAWR Context
AWR is the memecoin side of SOL-AWR and is likely to have less dependable external liquidity than SOL, making its price more sensitive to concentrated buying or selling. AWR appreciation or collapse against SOL changes the LP's asset mix and can create larger exit slippage or impermanent-loss exposure than the pool's fee return compensates for.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and AWR into a shared pool used by traders. You receive part of the trading fees, but the amounts of SOL and AWR you can withdraw change as their prices move, and the memecoin may be difficult to sell during a sharp decline.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- Fo7VNHaddVnMX4Axjo7CC1wWb9Ko2Pk2dFDzL3dYbXKp
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- AWR (Ai4CL1SA…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
13%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
6%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The reward component is 0.0%, so the current quoted APR is driven by 0.6% in trading fees rather than emissions. If rewards are introduced later and then decay, only that reward component would decline directly, while fee APR would still depend on trading volume.
The reward component is 0.0%, so the current quoted APR is driven by 0.6% in trading fees rather than emissions. If rewards are introduced later and then decay, only that reward component would decline directly, while fee APR would still depend on trading volume.
There is no current reward allocation reflected in the quoted yield, so incentive expiry would not remove an existing reward stream from the present APR. The remaining return would be 0.6%, and 100% of current yield already comes from fees.
There is no current reward allocation reflected in the quoted yield, so incentive expiry would not remove an existing reward stream from the present APR. The remaining return would be 0.6%, and 100% of current yield already comes from fees.
Risk is elevated because AWR can move sharply against SOL and may have less external liquidity for exits. The pool has $109K of liquidity, $1K in recent volume, and a 0.01x volume-to-liquidity ratio, so fee income may not offset a large AWR repricing.
Risk is elevated because AWR can move sharply against SOL and may have less external liquidity for exits. The pool has $109K of liquidity, $1K in recent volume, and a 0.01x volume-to-liquidity ratio, so fee income may not offset a large AWR repricing.
For SOL-AWR, consider exiting when liquidity or 0.01x deteriorates materially, when AWR loses reliable external pricing, or when price leaves your chosen range and rebalancing no longer justifies the exposure. A falling fee return is more relevant here than reward expiry because current yield is fee-funded.
For SOL-AWR, consider exiting when liquidity or 0.01x deteriorates materially, when AWR loses reliable external pricing, or when price leaves your chosen range and rebalancing no longer justifies the exposure. A falling fee return is more relevant here than reward expiry because current yield is fee-funded.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported for this pool. With total APR at 0.6% and volume-to-liquidity at 0.01x, break-even depends on future fee volume and whether SOL and AWR converge after diverging.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported for this pool. With total APR at 0.6% and volume-to-liquidity at 0.01x, break-even depends on future fee volume and whether SOL and AWR converge after diverging.
