NEURALINK-USDCon Raydium CLMMCLMMActive
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $438.36K
- APR
- 10.2% APR
- 24h Volume
- $55.57K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.25% fee
- Pool address
- FrXXHbGi…58WF · observed 2026-10-26
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A Wealthville Score of 17/100 places this pool below the Enter threshold of 15/100 and Hold threshold of 20/100, while the Exit threshold is 80/100 and the live verdict is EXIT. The score is consistent with the ai_engine=hold output being outweighed by a CRITICAL scanner result and a strong, unopposed EXIT signal. Its rank of #1884 of 9963 raydium-clmm pools indicates a mid-lower relative position rather than a top-tier pool. The assessment would improve if TVL and fee-generating volume remained stable or increased, the scanner ceased to be critical, and realized fee yield persisted; a TVL drain or collapse in trading activity would strengthen the exit case.
Computed 2026-10-26 20:36 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$438.36K
Total value locked
$55.57K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up10.2%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 60.6%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
If entering despite the live exit signal, use a narrow, actively monitored range and set a precommitted exit trigger for a sustained drop in fee volume or TVL, or if the scanner remains CRITICAL while the unopposed exit signal persists.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 10.2% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 9.7% | — | — |
| Volume | $55.57K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $139.11 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#3 of 10 NEURALINK-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#2046 of 19497 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 16% of all Solana pools
overall rank #22447 of 148664
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the NEURALINK-USDC liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing NEURALINK and USDC into a shared trading pool. Traders use the pool, and you receive a share of trading fees, but large NEURALINK price changes can leave you with a different mix of assets and a lower result than simply holding them.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 9.7% from trading fees and 0.5% from rewards, with 95% of yield attributed to fees. No established reward schedule is available, so the quoted APR should not be treated as a guaranteed ongoing rate; fee income depends on continued trading activity and the pool’s liquidity.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss data and the seven-day tick-in-range reading are unavailable, so recent loss behavior and range utilization cannot be verified. As a MEMECOIN pool, NEURALINK-USDC is exposed to sharp, asymmetric price moves in NEURALINK, which can create material inventory divergence and concentrated-liquidity rebalancing needs. Emission decay is an additional family-level concern if incentives are introduced or reduced, making exit timing dependent on both trading-fee persistence and the token’s liquidity and price trend.
tollNEURALINK Context
NEURALINK is the volatile asset in this pair, while USDC is the quote asset used to measure its price. The supplied data does not establish NEURALINK’s liquidity depth elsewhere, so a rapid price move or thin external liquidity could increase execution costs and amplify impermanent loss for this LP. A rise in NEURALINK relative to USDC generally leaves the position with less NEURALINK after rebalancing; a fall generally leaves it with more.
tollUSDC Context
USDC supplies the stable reference side of the pair and reduces one source of price volatility relative to a two-memecoin pool. The supplied data does not establish USDC-specific depth outside this pool, but USDC’s intended role is to provide the settlement asset against which NEURALINK is repriced. USDC depeg or issuer-related risk would affect both the reference value and the LP’s accounting.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing NEURALINK and USDC into a shared trading pool. Traders use the pool, and you receive a share of trading fees, but large NEURALINK price changes can leave you with a different mix of assets and a lower result than simply holding them.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- FrXXHbGiDG2v4bVZqtXGGiiJmg1BQUw4CVXpLSXN58WF
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- NEURALINK (PrekqLJv…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 10/19/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current yield is decomposed into 9.7% in fees and 0.5% in rewards, with 95% of yield coming from fees. If emissions are reduced, only the reward component falls directly; the fee component still depends on trading volume and liquidity.
The current yield is decomposed into 9.7% in fees and 0.5% in rewards, with 95% of yield coming from fees. If emissions are reduced, only the reward component falls directly; the fee component still depends on trading volume and liquidity.
The reward component would decline toward its post-incentive level, while the fee component remains 9.7% only if trading activity persists. Because fee sustainability is 95%, the pool is not currently described as relying on rewards, but its realized APR can still fall if volume or TVL declines.
The reward component would decline toward its post-incentive level, while the fee component remains 9.7% only if trading activity persists. Because fee sustainability is 95%, the pool is not currently described as relying on rewards, but its realized APR can still fall if volume or TVL declines.
Risk is high relative to a stablecoin pair because NEURALINK can experience abrupt price changes, thin external liquidity, and adverse inventory shifts. Recent impermanent-loss and range-utilization readings are unavailable, while the live assessment is EXIT and the scanner is CRITICAL.
Risk is high relative to a stablecoin pair because NEURALINK can experience abrupt price changes, thin external liquidity, and adverse inventory shifts. Recent impermanent-loss and range-utilization readings are unavailable, while the live assessment is EXIT and the scanner is CRITICAL.
For this pool, an exit is especially defensible if TVL or fee volume falls materially, the scanner remains CRITICAL, or the unopposed exit signal persists. An LP should also reassess when NEURALINK liquidity deteriorates or when the fee component no longer compensates for the position’s price exposure.
For this pool, an exit is especially defensible if TVL or fee volume falls materially, the scanner remains CRITICAL, or the unopposed exit signal persists. An LP should also reassess when NEURALINK liquidity deteriorates or when the fee component no longer compensates for the position’s price exposure.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss data is unavailable and future volume is uncertain. The relevant comparison is whether accumulated fees at 9.7% offset realized inventory loss over time; 10.2% alone does not establish a payback period.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss data is unavailable and future volume is uncertain. The relevant comparison is whether accumulated fees at 9.7% offset realized inventory loss over time; 10.2% alone does not establish a payback period.
