GTR-TDCCPon Raydium CLMMCLMM
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $114.96K
- APR
- 0.6% APR
- 24h Volume
- $18.58K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.01% fee
- Pool address
- FsJhLEhH…bboo · observed 2026-11-02
Wealthville Score
Verdict AVOID · 60% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A Wealthville Score of 19/100 with Enter 10/100, Hold 30/100, and Exit 60/100 places this pool in an exit-oriented risk band. The live verdict is AVOID: the AI engine says hold, but the scanner is CRITICAL and the strong EXIT signal is unopposed. The pool ranks #1884 of 9963 raydium-clmm pools, so it is not near the strongest part of the listed universe. The assessment would improve only if scanner risk cleared, liquidity and sustained volume increased, and fee income remained durable; a TVL drain, yield collapse, or further deterioration in trading activity would reinforce the exit case.
Computed 2026-11-02 07:37 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$114.96K
Total value locked
$18.58K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.6%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -1.9%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
If entering, use a narrow range only with a predefined rebalance trigger based on either asset leaving that range, and exit when the scanner remains CRITICAL or swap activity weakens materially from 0.16x; do not wait for emissions to justify staying.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.6% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.6% | — | — |
| Volume | $18.58K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $1.86 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 3 GTR-TDCCP pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1660 of 19841 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 14% of all Solana pools
overall rank #20275 of 152129
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the GTR-TDCCP liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing GTR and TDCCP into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but price changes can leave you with a less valuable mix of the two tokens, and this memecoin pool may be difficult to exit during a sharp move.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The quoted APR decomposes into 0.6% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 100% of yield is fee-derived, while the reward dependency and remaining reward schedule are not established. The fee rate therefore provides the more relevant basis for evaluating this position; any change in trading activity or liquidity can reduce realized fee income.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and the share of liquidity that remained in range are not available, so realized range risk cannot be quantified from the supplied record. As a MEMECOIN pool, GTR-TDCCP is exposed to sharp price moves, thin liquidity, and asymmetric demand; emission decay can remove any temporary support for the quoted return. Exit timing matters because a rapid price move can leave an LP holding more of the weaker asset while fees may not compensate for the divergence.
tollGTR Context
GTR is one side of the GTR-TDCCP pair and its price movement directly determines how the position inventory shifts between GTR and TDCCP. The available data does not establish GTR's liquidity depth across other venues, so depth elsewhere should be checked before treating this pool's TVL as sufficient. A sharp GTR move can increase impermanent loss and make the pool's narrow liquidity more difficult to exit without price impact.
tollTDCCP Context
TDCCP is the other asset in the pair, so TDCCP price action has the same inventory and range effects for this LP. Its liquidity depth elsewhere is not established by the supplied pool metrics; thin external markets would increase execution risk during rebalancing or exit. Relative TDCCP strength or weakness can also shift the position toward one asset even while fee income continues.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing GTR and TDCCP into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but price changes can leave you with a less valuable mix of the two tokens, and this memecoin pool may be difficult to exit during a sharp move.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- FsJhLEhHBnsCGyRcRWcuupGzn7nzeBJ79AnffSAWbboo
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- GTR (CatEvkKV…)
- Token B
- TDCCP (Hg8bKz4m…)
- Created
- 10/9/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The pool's return is currently represented by 0.6% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, with 100% of yield coming from fees. If emissions decline, the reward component can fall without affecting fee income, leaving realized returns more dependent on $19K and 0.16x.
The pool's return is currently represented by 0.6% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, with 100% of yield coming from fees. If emissions decline, the reward component can fall without affecting fee income, leaving realized returns more dependent on $19K and 0.16x.
The reward component would disappear or decline, leaving the fee-derived component of 0.6% as the primary return. With 100% already coming from trading fees, the position would then depend on whether $19K is sufficient to support ongoing fees.
The reward component would disappear or decline, leaving the fee-derived component of 0.6% as the primary return. With 100% already coming from trading fees, the position would then depend on whether $19K is sufficient to support ongoing fees.
Risk is elevated because this is a MEMECOIN pool with a CRITICAL scanner signal, uncertain liquidity conditions, and unquantified recent range and impermanent-loss history. The quoted 0.6% should not be treated as protection against a sharp GTR or TDCCP price move.
Risk is elevated because this is a MEMECOIN pool with a CRITICAL scanner signal, uncertain liquidity conditions, and unquantified recent range and impermanent-loss history. The quoted 0.6% should not be treated as protection against a sharp GTR or TDCCP price move.
For this pool, an exit rule should be tied to the scanner remaining CRITICAL, either token leaving the selected range, or trading activity weakening from 0.16x. The current verdict is AVOID, so waiting for emissions alone is not a sufficient exit plan.
For this pool, an exit rule should be tied to the scanner remaining CRITICAL, either token leaving the selected range, or trading activity weakening from 0.16x. The current verdict is AVOID, so waiting for emissions alone is not a sufficient exit plan.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and price divergence is unknown. Gross fee accrual is represented by 0.6%, but actual break-even depends on future divergence, time in range, and whether $19K persists.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and price divergence is unknown. Gross fee accrual is represented by 0.6%, but actual break-even depends on future divergence, time in range, and whether $19K persists.
