new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 places this pool below its Enter threshold of 15/100, its Hold threshold of 20/100, and its Exit threshold of 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT. Its #2192-of-18146 ranking among raydium-amm pools is consistent with a weak relative profile, while ai_engine=hold is outweighed by scanner=CRITICAL and an unopposed strong EXIT signal. The assessment could improve through sustained volume growth, stable or rising TVL, stronger fee generation, and removal of the critical scanner condition; a TVL drain or further yield collapse would reinforce the exit case.
Computed 2026-11-05 03:07 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$132.49K
Total value locked
$57.17
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 0.1%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
If entering despite the current exit signal, use a monitored range rather than passive full-range exposure and exit or rebalance when MUMU's price leaves that range, fee accrual weakens, or pool liquidity begins to drain.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.1% | — | — |
| Volume | $57.17 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.14 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 MUMU-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#13102 of 95936 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 13% of all Solana pools
overall rank #19033 of 153992
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the MUMU-SOL liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing MUMU and SOL into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but price changes between the two tokens can leave you with less value than simply holding them, and this pool currently offers no meaningful reward-based offset.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield splits into 0.1% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 100% means the displayed return is dependent on trading activity rather than current incentives. Reward dependency is not established, so emission-based APR should not be treated as a durable component.
shieldRisk Assessment
A recent seven-day impermanent-loss reading is unavailable, and seven-day tick-in-range coverage is also unavailable, so recent position behavior cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, MUMU-SOL carries token-price and liquidity-exit risk in addition to divergence between MUMU and SOL. Emission decay is relevant if incentives are introduced later: exit timing should account for declining rewards, thin trading flow, and the possibility that fee income does not compensate for price divergence.
tollMUMU Context
MUMU is the memecoin side of this pair and its liquidity depth outside this pool is not established by the supplied metrics. A sharp MUMU move relative to SOL changes the pool composition through arbitrage and can leave an LP holding more of the underperforming asset, while a thin market can make that adjustment costly.
tollSOL Context
SOL provides the established-asset side of the pair and is the reference asset against which MUMU's price movement is measured. SOL price changes can still create impermanent loss relative to holding both assets separately, especially when MUMU and SOL move in different directions; this pool's low trading activity limits fee compensation.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing MUMU and SOL into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but price changes between the two tokens can leave you with less value than simply holding them, and this pool currently offers no meaningful reward-based offset.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- FvMZrD1qC66Zw8VPrW15xN1N5owUPqpQgNQ5oH18mR4E
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- MUMU (5LafQUrV…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
18%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Current rewards contribute 0.0% to the total 0.1%, so the quoted APR is not presently supported by a significant emission stream. If emissions are added later, decay would reduce that component unless trading fees, represented by 0.1%, increase.
Current rewards contribute 0.0% to the total 0.1%, so the quoted APR is not presently supported by a significant emission stream. If emissions are added later, decay would reduce that component unless trading fees, represented by 0.1%, increase.
The reward component would fall toward zero, leaving the pool dependent on 0.1% in trading fees. Because 100% already attributes the yield to fees, incentive expiry would not create a new fee source but could reduce any future reward contribution.
The reward component would fall toward zero, leaving the pool dependent on 0.1% in trading fees. Because 100% already attributes the yield to fees, incentive expiry would not create a new fee source but could reduce any future reward contribution.
Risk is elevated because MUMU can move sharply, liquidity can be thin, and its price may diverge substantially from SOL. The pool also has a critical scanner signal, while recent seven-day impermanent-loss and range data are unavailable for verification.
Risk is elevated because MUMU can move sharply, liquidity can be thin, and its price may diverge substantially from SOL. The pool also has a critical scanner signal, while recent seven-day impermanent-loss and range data are unavailable for verification.
For this pool, an exit is reasonable when MUMU leaves the managed range, fee income weakens, pool liquidity drains, or the critical scanner condition persists. The current live verdict is EXIT, with the score structure favoring exit over entry or holding.
For this pool, an exit is reasonable when MUMU leaves the managed range, fee income weakens, pool liquidity drains, or the critical scanner condition persists. The current live verdict is EXIT, with the score structure favoring exit over entry or holding.
It cannot be estimated reliably because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable. At 0.1%, break-even depends on sustained fee volume, the magnitude and duration of MUMU-SOL price divergence, and whether the position remains in an effective trading range.
It cannot be estimated reliably because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable. At 0.1%, break-even depends on sustained fee volume, the magnitude and duration of MUMU-SOL price divergence, and whether the position remains in an effective trading range.
