WealthVille
SOL
S
zazu
z

SOL-zazuon Raydium AMM

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $46.06K
APR
0.1% APR
24h Volume
$3.01 24h vol
Fee tier
0.75% fee
Pool address
GMYzyb4f…qzCU · observed 2026-11-12
17F · Poor

Wealthville Score

Verdict EXIT · 70% confidence

ai_engine=holdscanner=CRITICAL
How this score works →
Enter15

new capital

Hold20

keep position

Exit80

urgency to leave

SOL-ZAZU is primarily a low-activity memecoin pool rather than a yield-focused venue: $46K supports only $3 of 24-hour volume. Its 0.1% return is entirely fee-derived, while 0.00x indicates limited current fee-generation activity. The pool is worth considering only if its swap utility and SOL-ZAZU exposure fit the LP's thesis.

Computed 2026-11-06 00:31 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$46.06K

Total value locked

$3.01

24h volume

×0.0 turnover

Yieldhelp

trending_up

0.1%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

≈ -0.3%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

0.75% fee

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 3955m ago
block

AI Verdict

Avoid

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

check_circleFee-driven yield: 100% of APR from trading fees
warningElevated risk score: 66/100
tips_and_updates

Enter only with a range you can monitor actively, and exit or rebalance if ZAZU leaves that range or if trading activity remains at $3 while fee income no longer compensates for management and transaction costs.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

table_chart

Performance Breakdown

Metric24h / Day7d / Week30d / Month
Total APR0.1%——
Fee APR0.1%——
Volume$3.01——
Fees Earned$0.02——

Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
0.0%(trailing 7d fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−0.4%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
-0.3%(drags exceed yield)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
0.00x(protocol avg 2.2x)
Fee Yield per $1 TVL / Day
$0.0000
Fee APR Sustainability
100% from trading fees(sustainable)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#1 of 1 SOL-zazu pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#814 of 99294 on raydium-amm

by AI Farmer Score

leaderboard

Top 1% of all Solana pools

overall rank #1243 of 157883

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-zazu liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and ZAZU into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You receive fees represented by 0.1%, but your holdings can become more concentrated in the asset that performs worse, and there are no current reward payments represented by 0.0%.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

The quoted return decomposes into 0.1% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 100% of yield comes from fees, so the current APR does not depend on emissions. Reward dependency is not established, and no reward-duration assumption should be used when projecting returns.

shieldRisk Assessment

Seven-day impermanent-loss history and the share of liquidity that stayed in range are not available, so recent loss behavior and range efficiency cannot be validated from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-ZAZU also carries token-specific volatility, liquidity, and exit-timing risk; any emission decay would remove support for LP returns, and the absence of current reward APR means exit decisions should focus on volume, fees, and ZAZU liquidity rather than incentive retention.

tollSOL Context

SOL is the established network asset in this pair and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than ZAZU. SOL price moves change the pool's inventory mix and can create impermanent loss relative to holding SOL, particularly when ZAZU does not move in step with it.

tollzazu Context

ZAZU is the memecoin-side exposure and is likely to determine much of the pool's liquidity and exit risk. A sharp ZAZU move can rebalance the LP toward the weaker-performing asset, while thin external liquidity can increase slippage when withdrawing or rebalancing.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and ZAZU into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You receive fees represented by 0.1%, but your holdings can become more concentrated in the asset that performs worse, and there are no current reward payments represented by 0.0%.

token

Token Details

SOL
SOLWrapped SOLSolana

Solana is a high-performance blockchain supporting builders around the world creating crypto apps that scale today.

zazu
zazuSolana
Explorer

zazu is one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
GMYzyb4fjyzSoqUq5SXgqEMVTGr2cyCSEYoNjcosqzCU
Protocol
Raydium AMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
—
Pool Type
AMM
Token A
SOL (So111111…)
Token B
zazu (7phbaH6U…)
Created
4/22/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

The current reward component is 0.0%, so the quoted 0.1% is currently fee-based rather than emission-based. If incentives are introduced and later decay, that component would fall without offsetting volume growth.

The current reward component is 0.0%, so the quoted 0.1% is currently fee-based rather than emission-based. If incentives are introduced and later decay, that component would fall without offsetting volume growth.

There is currently no reward contribution represented by 0.0%, so expiry would not reduce the present reward component. After any incentive program ends, the position would depend on trading fees, with 100% of current yield sourced from fees.

There is currently no reward contribution represented by 0.0%, so expiry would not reduce the present reward component. After any incentive program ends, the position would depend on trading fees, with 100% of current yield sourced from fees.

Risk is driven by SOL-ZAZU price divergence, ZAZU liquidity, and the ability to exit without high slippage. Recent impermanent-loss and in-range history are unavailable, while the pool's $46K and 0.00x indicate limited current trading activity.

Risk is driven by SOL-ZAZU price divergence, ZAZU liquidity, and the ability to exit without high slippage. Recent impermanent-loss and in-range history are unavailable, while the pool's $46K and 0.00x indicate limited current trading activity.

Exit or rebalance when ZAZU leaves the selected price range, external ZAZU liquidity deteriorates, or fees no longer justify the position's inventory and execution risk. For SOL-ZAZU, persistent activity near $3 is a reason to reassess rather than assume the quoted 0.1% will persist.

Exit or rebalance when ZAZU leaves the selected price range, external ZAZU liquidity deteriorates, or fees no longer justify the position's inventory and execution risk. For SOL-ZAZU, persistent activity near $3 is a reason to reassess rather than assume the quoted 0.1% will persist.

It cannot be estimated reliably because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable. At 0.1% gross annualized return, recovery from a material price-divergence loss would require sustained fee income and stable enough prices for the position to remain active.

It cannot be estimated reliably because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable. At 0.1% gross annualized return, recovery from a material price-divergence loss would require sustained fee income and stable enough prices for the position to remain active.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights