WealthVille
SOL
S
GRINCH
G

SOL-GRINCHon Raydium AMM

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $51.90K
APR
6.6% APR
24h Volume
$6.07K 24h vol
Pool address
GStSNPJp…vtgM · observed 2026-11-05
19F · Poor

Wealthville Score

Verdict AVOID · 59% confidence

ai_engine=holdhigh risk (0.79) + weak yield → avoid
How this score works →
Enter10

new capital

Hold30

keep position

Exit60

urgency to leave

The Wealthville Score is 19/100, with Enter at 10/100, Hold at 30/100, and Exit at 60/100; the live verdict is AVOID. That result is consistent with ai_engine=hold, scanner=CRITICAL, and a strong EXIT signal marked unopposed. The pool ranks #1710 of 24532 raydium-amm pools, so it is not near the weakest tail of the listed set, but the score still indicates that current fee activity and risk conditions do not justify a new position under the stated framework. The assessment would improve if TVL and volume grew together, the scanner moved away from CRITICAL, and fee generation remained sustained; a TVL drain or yield collapse would reinforce the exit case.

Computed 2026-11-05 03:07 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$51.90K

Total value locked

$6.07K

24h volume

×0.1 turnover

Yieldhelp

trending_up

6.6%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

≈ 4.2%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 90m agoTVL ↓2.7%
block

AI Verdict

Avoid

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

check_circleFee-driven yield: 97% of APR from trading fees
warningElevated risk score: 79/100
tips_and_updates

If entering, use a range that can be monitored frequently and set an exit trigger for any further deterioration in the current 0.12x activity level or a continued CRITICAL scanner status; do not leave the position unattended through a GRINCH price spike.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

table_chart

Performance Breakdown

Metric24h / Day7d / Week30d / Month
Total APR6.6%——
Fee APR6.4%——
Volume$6.07K——
Fees Earned$15.18——

Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
4.3%(trailing 7d fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−0.1%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
4.2%(after IL + repositioning)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
0.12x(protocol avg 3.1x)
Fee Yield per $1 TVL / Day
$0.0003
Fee APR Sustainability
97% from trading fees(sustainable)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#1 of 3 SOL-GRINCH pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#2849 of 95936 on raydium-amm

by AI Farmer Score

leaderboard

Top 5% of all Solana pools

overall rank #6532 of 153992

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-GRINCH liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and GRINCH into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the value of your deposit can change unevenly if either token moves sharply, especially GRINCH.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

The yield decomposes into 6.4% from trading fees and 0.2% from rewards. 97% of yield comes from fees, so APR depends on continued swap activity rather than emissions. Reward timing and dependency are not established in the supplied pool data, so the fee component is the more defensible basis for evaluating returns.

shieldRisk Assessment

A recent seven-day impermanent-loss reading is not available, so realized IL cannot be assessed from the supplied history. Tick-in-range exposure over that period is also unavailable, leaving the effectiveness of any active range strategy unverified. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-GRINCH carries emission-decay risk if incentives are introduced or reduced, rapid price divergence risk in GRINCH, and meaningful exit-timing risk when liquidity or trading activity contracts.

tollSOL Context

SOL is the base asset in this pool and generally has substantially deeper liquidity elsewhere on Solana than this pair. If SOL moves sharply against GRINCH, the pool's asset mix changes through arbitrage, potentially increasing impermanent loss even when fee income continues.

tollGRINCH Context

GRINCH is the memecoin side of the pair, so its liquidity and price discovery may be less resilient than SOL's broader market. A sharp GRINCH repricing can create large inventory shifts for LPs and may make exit timing more important than the stated APR.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and GRINCH into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the value of your deposit can change unevenly if either token moves sharply, especially GRINCH.

token

Token Details

SOL
SOLWrapped SOLSolana

Solana is a high-performance blockchain supporting builders around the world creating crypto apps that scale today.

GRINCH
GRINCHSolana
Explorer

GRINCH is one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
GStSNPJp4Wz2QbyG6hEuAUn47EiA7r6PtX4pmGj4vtgM
Protocol
Raydium AMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
—
Pool Type
AMM
Token A
SOL (So111111…)
Token B
GRINCH (F2JLbzaA…)
Created
5/22/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

The current breakdown is 6.4% in fees and 0.2% in rewards, with 97% of yield coming from fees. If emissions are reduced, only the reward component falls directly, but the pool's total return remains dependent on its limited trading activity.

The current breakdown is 6.4% in fees and 0.2% in rewards, with 97% of yield coming from fees. If emissions are reduced, only the reward component falls directly, but the pool's total return remains dependent on its limited trading activity.

There is no confirmed reward timetable in the supplied data. If incentives expire, the reward component would fall toward zero and the remaining return would depend on 6.4% in trading fees rather than emissions.

There is no confirmed reward timetable in the supplied data. If incentives expire, the reward component would fall toward zero and the remaining return would depend on 6.4% in trading fees rather than emissions.

Risk is high because SOL and GRINCH can diverge sharply, changing the amounts of each asset held by the pool and creating impermanent loss. The pool also has a 0.12x activity ratio, a CRITICAL scanner status, and an unopposed strong EXIT signal.

Risk is high because SOL and GRINCH can diverge sharply, changing the amounts of each asset held by the pool and creating impermanent loss. The pool also has a 0.12x activity ratio, a CRITICAL scanner status, and an unopposed strong EXIT signal.

For this pool, an exit is more defensible when trading activity weakens further, TVL drains, the scanner remains CRITICAL, or GRINCH moves sharply outside the monitored range. The current live verdict is AVOID, so waiting for a confirmed deterioration is not the only reasonable exit criterion.

For this pool, an exit is more defensible when trading activity weakens further, TVL drains, the scanner remains CRITICAL, or GRINCH moves sharply outside the monitored range. The current live verdict is AVOID, so waiting for a confirmed deterioration is not the only reasonable exit criterion.

A realistic break-even time cannot be calculated from the supplied data because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable. Any recovery would have to come from ongoing fees of 6.4% and favorable subsequent price behavior, neither of which is guaranteed.

A realistic break-even time cannot be calculated from the supplied data because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable. Any recovery would have to come from ongoing fees of 6.4% and favorable subsequent price behavior, neither of which is guaranteed.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights