WealthVille
RAY
R
SRM
S

RAY-SRMon Raydium AMM

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $94.86K
APR
7.7% APR
24h Volume
$6.89K 24h vol
Pool address
GaqgfieVNy8m · observed 2026-09-21
49D · Weak

Wealthville Score

Verdict HOLD · 55% confidence

ai_engine=hold
How this score works →
Enter43

new capital

Hold56

keep position

Exit25

urgency to leave

The Wealthville Score is 49/100, with Enter at 43/100, Hold at 56/100, and Exit at 25/100; the live verdict is HOLD and the stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold. Ranked #1208 of 8541 raydium-amm pools, this places RAY-SRM in a middle-risk, monitor-rather-than-accumulate position: its fee-only structure is clear, but the MEMECOIN classification, modest liquidity base, and limited activity leave less room for execution shocks. The assessment would weaken if TVL drained, volume fell further, or fee APR collapsed; it could improve if TVL and sustained fee volume increased without a corresponding rise in price divergence.

Computed 2026-09-21 06:50 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$94.86K

Total value locked

$6.89K

24h volume

×0.1 turnover

Yieldhelp

trending_up

7.7%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

-43.7%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 42m agoTVL 2.0%
schedule

AI Verdict

Wait & Monitor

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

check_circleFee-driven yield: 96% of APR from trading fees
warningElevated risk score: 64/100
tips_and_updates

Set a written exit rule before entering: close or materially reduce the position if pool TVL falls 25% from $95K for two consecutive checks, or if 24-hour volume remains below $7K while the RAY/SRM price relationship is moving sharply.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

table_chart

Performance Breakdown

Metric24h / Day7d / Week30d / Month
Total APR7.7%
Fee APR7.5%
Volume$6.89K
Fees Earned$17.23

Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
9.1%(trailing 7d fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−52.8%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
-43.7%(drags exceed yield)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
0.07x
Fee Yield per $1 TVL / Day
$0.0002
Fee APR Sustainability
96% from trading fees(sustainable)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#1 of 2 RAY-SRM pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#1196 of 69219 on raydium-amm

by AI Farmer Score

leaderboard

Top 3% of all Solana pools

overall rank #3115 of 118991

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the RAY-SRM liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing both RAY and SRM into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but you may end up with more of the weaker-performing token and withdraw less value than if you had simply held both assets.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

The total APR decomposes into 7.5% from swap fees and 0.3% from rewards. 96% of yield is fee-funded, so there is no current reward component supporting the stated return. For this MEMECOIN pool, fee income can weaken quickly if trading migrates elsewhere; emission decay is not currently the main APR risk because reward APR is zero.

shieldRisk Assessment

Seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range coverage are not reported for this pool, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, RAY-SRM is exposed to sharp relative moves, liquidity migration, and potentially poor exit conditions; fee income may not offset those effects. There is no current reward stream to cushion a drawdown, making exit timing more dependent on trading activity, TVL stability, and the RAY/SRM price relationship.

tollRAY Context

RAY is one side of the RAY-SRM position, so an LP supplies RAY together with SRM and receives fees from swaps between them. A rise or fall in RAY relative to SRM changes the inventory mix and can create impermanent loss; comparable RAY liquidity depth elsewhere is not quantified in the supplied metrics.

tollSRM Context

SRM is the other asset in the pair, and its relative price determines how much SRM an LP holds after arbitrage and rebalancing. SRM-specific liquidity depth elsewhere is not quantified here, so a sharp SRM move or thinner external liquidity could increase execution and exit risk for this LP.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing both RAY and SRM into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but you may end up with more of the weaker-performing token and withdraw less value than if you had simply held both assets.

token

Token Details

RAY
RAYRaydiumSolana
Explorer

Raydium (RAY) — one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

SRM
SRMSerumSolana
Explorer

Serum (SRM) — one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
GaqgfieVmnmY4ZsZHHA6L5RSVzCGL3sKx4UgHBaYNy8m
Protocol
Raydium AMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
Pool Type
AMM
Token A
RAY (4k3Dyjzv…)
Token B
SRM (SRMuApVN…)
Created
4/22/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

The current reward APR is 0.3%, while fee APR is 7.5%, so the stated 7.7% APR is currently driven by trading fees rather than emissions. Future emission changes would not directly reduce the present reward component because it is already zero.

The current reward APR is 0.3%, while fee APR is 7.5%, so the stated 7.7% APR is currently driven by trading fees rather than emissions. Future emission changes would not directly reduce the present reward component because it is already zero.

Current rewards contribute 0.3%, so expiration would not remove a currently paying reward stream. LP returns would remain dependent on 7.5% in trading fees, which can decline if volume falls.

Current rewards contribute 0.3%, so expiration would not remove a currently paying reward stream. LP returns would remain dependent on 7.5% in trading fees, which can decline if volume falls.

The MEMECOIN classification means relative price shocks, liquidity migration, and difficult exits are material risks. RAY and SRM can diverge sharply, and the fee-only 7.7% return may not compensate for the resulting inventory loss.

The MEMECOIN classification means relative price shocks, liquidity migration, and difficult exits are material risks. RAY and SRM can diverge sharply, and the fee-only 7.7% return may not compensate for the resulting inventory loss.

Use a predefined trigger tied to pool conditions rather than APR alone: consider exiting if TVL drops materially from $95K, volume stays below $7K, or one token begins sharply underperforming the other. A sustained decline in fee income is also an exit signal because there is no reward APR to replace it.

Use a predefined trigger tied to pool conditions rather than APR alone: consider exiting if TVL drops materially from $95K, volume stays below $7K, or one token begins sharply underperforming the other. A sustained decline in fee income is also an exit signal because there is no reward APR to replace it.

No reliable seven-day impermanent-loss history is available, so a precise break-even period cannot be established. The simple gross approximation is one year divided by 7.5% if fees persist and prices do not diverge further, but actual break-even can be much longer or never occur after a large RAY/SRM move.

No reliable seven-day impermanent-loss history is available, so a precise break-even period cannot be established. The simple gross approximation is one year divided by 7.5% if fees persist and prices do not diverge further, but actual break-even can be much longer or never occur after a large RAY/SRM move.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights