new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100. The live verdict is EXIT, driven by ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #1245 of 24532 raydium-amm pools. In practical terms, the assessment supports monitoring an existing position more than adding aggressively: fee-funded APR is present, but low turnover and memecoin-specific liquidity risk limit conviction. A sustained TVL drain, weaker volume, fee-income collapse, or worsening price-range behavior would change the assessment toward exit; stronger and persistent fee volume with stable liquidity could support a more constructive view.
Computed 2026-11-10 10:39 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$61.19K
Total value locked
$33.89
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.2%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 0.0%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a monitored tick range and set a rebalance trigger for a sustained move outside that range; exit rather than widen the position if swap activity weakens materially or LFGO liquidity migrates elsewhere. With tick performance unavailable, do not assume a passive full-range position is efficient.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.2% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.2% | — | — |
| Volume | $33.89 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.08 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 SOL-LFGO pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1 of 99294 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1 of 157883
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-LFGO liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and LFGO into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the value of your deposit can fall if SOL and LFGO move sharply apart or if LFGO loses demand.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 0.2% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. Fee sustainability is 100%, so the displayed return is supported by swap activity rather than a reward stream. Reward dependency is not established, and no confirmed reward duration is available; future APR therefore depends on volume, liquidity, and fee generation.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading and tick-in-range reading are not available, so recent price divergence and range efficiency cannot be quantified from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-LFGO carries material token-price and liquidity-migration risk; emission schedules can decay or end, and exit timing matters if trading activity moves to another pool. The absence of reward dependence in the displayed APR reduces direct emission risk, but does not reduce memecoin volatility or adverse selection risk.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established asset in this pair and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana venues than LFGO. SOL price movements relative to LFGO determine the pool's inventory shift and can create impermanent loss even when fee income continues.
tollLFGO Context
LFGO is the less liquid memecoin side of the pair, so its price can be more sensitive to concentrated flows, exchange migration, and changes in holder demand. A sharp LFGO move against SOL can leave the LP with more of the depreciating asset and less of the appreciating one.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and LFGO into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the value of your deposit can fall if SOL and LFGO move sharply apart or if LFGO loses demand.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- Gg382dsUBQsr4aRSXLjcH86Z6equaVAjhBZcNy9UUfZk
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- LFGO (2u98MM7D…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
17%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The displayed reward component is 0.0%, while the fee component is 0.2% and fee sustainability is 100%. If future incentives are introduced and then decay, only the reward portion would decline directly; fee income would still depend on trading volume.
The displayed reward component is 0.0%, while the fee component is 0.2% and fee sustainability is 100%. If future incentives are introduced and then decay, only the reward portion would decline directly; fee income would still depend on trading volume.
The currently displayed reward component is 0.0%, so there is no stated reward contribution to remove from the present APR. If incentives are added later and expire, returns would rely more fully on 0.2% and the pool's subsequent trading activity.
The currently displayed reward component is 0.0%, so there is no stated reward contribution to remove from the present APR. If incentives are added later and expire, returns would rely more fully on 0.2% and the pool's subsequent trading activity.
Risk is elevated because LFGO may be more volatile and less liquid than SOL, while recent impermanent-loss and tick-range readings are unavailable. The pool's 0.00x turnover and $61K liquidity indicate that fee generation depends on a relatively small amount of observed activity.
Risk is elevated because LFGO may be more volatile and less liquid than SOL, while recent impermanent-loss and tick-range readings are unavailable. The pool's 0.00x turnover and $61K liquidity indicate that fee generation depends on a relatively small amount of observed activity.
Consider exiting when LFGO liquidity migrates, volume falls persistently, price leaves the chosen tick range, or the pool's fee income no longer compensates for inventory and price risk. A worsening EXIT or deterioration in the score components would also warrant reassessment.
Consider exiting when LFGO liquidity migrates, volume falls persistently, price leaves the chosen tick range, or the pool's fee income no longer compensates for inventory and price risk. A worsening EXIT or deterioration in the score components would also warrant reassessment.
There is no defensible fixed break-even period because recent impermanent loss and tick-in-range data are unavailable. Fees accrue at 0.2% on an annualized basis, but actual recovery depends on future volume, price paths, and whether LFGO and SOL reconverge.
There is no defensible fixed break-even period because recent impermanent loss and tick-in-range data are unavailable. Fees accrue at 0.2% on an annualized basis, but actual recovery depends on future volume, price paths, and whether LFGO and SOL reconverge.
