new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A Wealthville Score of 17/100 sits below the Enter threshold of 15/100 and the Hold threshold of 20/100, while the Exit threshold is 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT. The pool ranks #699 of 2403 raydium-amm pools, but the ranking does not offset its weak activity: the scanner is CRITICAL, the strongest signal is unopposed, and the AI engine is only hold. The assessment would improve with sustained volume, stronger fee generation, deeper TVL, and a less severe scanner result; a TVL drain, further volume contraction, or yield collapse would reinforce the exit case.
Computed 2026-09-07 15:02 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$61.72K
Total value locked
$44.28
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.3%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -1.1%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Treat the scanner's CRITICAL status as the entry filter: enter only with a predefined short review interval, and withdraw if the scanner remains CRITICAL or 0.00x weakens further rather than waiting for emissions to improve the position.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.3% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.3% | — | — |
| Volume | $44.28 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.11 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 SOL-SPIKE pools
by AI Farmer Score
#4550 of 63453 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 9% of all Solana pools
overall rank #9058 of 110016
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-SPIKE liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and SPIKE into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive part of the trading fees. The current pool is small and lightly used, so the displayed return is low and large price changes between SOL and SPIKE can leave you with less value than simply holding both assets.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into fee-only APR of 0.3% and reward-only APR of 0.0%, for total APR of 0.3%. 100% of the displayed yield comes from trading fees, so returns depend on continued swap activity rather than emissions. Reward dependency and the remaining reward schedule are not established, and no reward-timing assumption should be used in an LP projection.
shieldRisk Assessment
No seven-day impermanent-loss reading or tick-in-range reading is available, so recent price-path and range-exposure risk cannot be quantified from these fields. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-SPIKE is exposed to sharp SPIKE price moves, shallow exit liquidity, and emission decay; a reduction in attention can lower volume before an LP can exit efficiently. The absence of an established lifecycle or persistence record makes exit timing less certain.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established settlement asset in this pair and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana markets than SPIKE. SOL price movement changes the pool's asset mix and can create divergence loss for an LP even when SOL itself remains liquid elsewhere. A SOL move against SPIKE can therefore shift both inventory composition and withdrawal value.
tollSPIKE Context
SPIKE is the memecoin side of the pair, so its price and tradability are more dependent on concentrated attention and available liquidity. A rapid SPIKE rally or decline can produce substantial inventory imbalance and divergence loss relative to holding the two assets separately. If SPIKE liquidity deteriorates elsewhere, exiting this pool may have greater price impact than entering it.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and SPIKE into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive part of the trading fees. The current pool is small and lightly used, so the displayed return is low and large price changes between SOL and SPIKE can leave you with less value than simply holding both assets.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- Gk4uCFPHUMriPVGNaAFr6v2YB491ViZtdMpGNsJAWfTe
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- SPIKE (BX9yEgW8…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
412%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
4%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Emission decay would reduce the reward component, but the displayed reward-only APR is 0.0% and total APR is 0.3%. Current returns are therefore driven by the fee-only APR of 0.3%, not by a meaningful emission stream.
Emission decay would reduce the reward component, but the displayed reward-only APR is 0.0% and total APR is 0.3%. Current returns are therefore driven by the fee-only APR of 0.3%, not by a meaningful emission stream.
If incentives expire, the reward component falls away and the remaining expected APR is the fee-only figure of 0.3%. For SOL-SPIKE, that change is limited in the current display because reward-only APR is 0.0%, but fee income still depends on its 0.00x volume-to-liquidity activity.
If incentives expire, the reward component falls away and the remaining expected APR is the fee-only figure of 0.3%. For SOL-SPIKE, that change is limited in the current display because reward-only APR is 0.0%, but fee income still depends on its 0.00x volume-to-liquidity activity.
The risk is high relative to a SOL pair with a more established second asset because SPIKE can move sharply and lose liquidity. SOL-SPIKE has TVL of $62K, 24h volume of $44, a 0.00x volume-to-liquidity ratio, and a CRITICAL scanner result, all of which can make exits more costly during a selloff.
The risk is high relative to a SOL pair with a more established second asset because SPIKE can move sharply and lose liquidity. SOL-SPIKE has TVL of $62K, 24h volume of $44, a 0.00x volume-to-liquidity ratio, and a CRITICAL scanner result, all of which can make exits more costly during a selloff.
For SOL-SPIKE, an exit is reasonable when the CRITICAL scanner signal persists, trading activity weakens, or the pool's fee income no longer compensates for SPIKE price risk. The current live verdict is EXIT, so an LP should define that exit trigger before entering rather than relying on emission recovery.
For SOL-SPIKE, an exit is reasonable when the CRITICAL scanner signal persists, trading activity weakens, or the pool's fee income no longer compensates for SPIKE price risk. The current live verdict is EXIT, so an LP should define that exit trigger before entering rather than relying on emission recovery.
There is no defensible break-even estimate because recent impermanent loss is not reported and fee income depends on low current activity. At the displayed fee-only APR of 0.3%, recovery would require sustained trading and stable enough relative prices for fees to offset the actual loss.
There is no defensible break-even estimate because recent impermanent loss is not reported and fee income depends on low current activity. At the displayed fee-only APR of 0.3%, recovery would require sustained trading and stable enough relative prices for fees to offset the actual loss.
