SNAP-USDCon Raydium CLMMCLMMActive
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $108.93K
- APR
- 42.8% APR
- 24h Volume
- $37.77K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.25% fee
- Pool address
- GosZTcF5…dzXi · observed 2026-11-01
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 15/100 places this pool below its Enter threshold of 15/100 and Hold threshold of 16/100, while the Exit threshold is 87/100. The live verdict is EXIT: the AI engine is hold, but the scanner is CRITICAL and the strong EXIT signal is unopposed. Its rank of #1884 of 9963 raydium-clmm pools indicates a relatively weak standing within the tracked set, despite fee-only yield and a 0.35x volume-to-TVL ratio. The assessment would improve only with sustained fee volume, stable or growing TVL, stronger range persistence, and removal of the critical scanner signal; a TVL drain or yield collapse would reinforce the exit case.
Computed 2026-11-01 06:10 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$108.93K
Total value locked
$37.77K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up42.8%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 683.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a conservative, actively monitored tick range and set a rebalance or exit rule for a sustained move outside that range; also exit if fee volume weakens materially while the pool's live verdict remains EXIT.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 42.8% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 35.7% | — | — |
| Volume | $37.77K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $97.48 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 4 SNAP-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#193 of 19841 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1480 of 152129
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SNAP-USDC liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SNAP and USDC into a price range so traders can swap between them. You receive trading fees, but SNAP's price can move sharply, changing the value and composition of your deposit and making it difficult to exit without slippage.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Current yield decomposes into 35.7% from trading fees and 7.2% from rewards. 83% of the reported yield is fee-funded, and reward dependency is not established; no reliable reward-duration estimate is available for modeling emission decay. With a protocol-median volume benchmark unavailable, the 0.35x ratio is best interpreted alongside the pool's shallow liquidity rather than as evidence of durable yield.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading and tick-in-range history are unavailable, so recent price divergence and range efficiency cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SNAP-USDC is exposed to abrupt SNAP repricing, shallow-liquidity slippage, and possible fee compression if trading activity fades. Emission decay is a secondary concern because current yield is fee-funded, but exit timing still matters if SNAP liquidity or volume deteriorates.
tollSNAP Context
SNAP is the volatile asset in this pair and is the main source of directional and impermanent-loss exposure for the LP. This pool does not establish SNAP's liquidity depth elsewhere, so price moves may be amplified when external markets or this pool are thin. A sharp SNAP rally or decline changes the inventory mix and can leave the LP with less of the asset that outperforms.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the dollar-denominated quote asset and the stable side of the pair, subject mainly to stablecoin, issuer, and market-structure risks rather than memecoin volatility. Its presence makes SNAP price movement the dominant driver of rebalancing and impermanent loss in this pool. USDC depth elsewhere can improve execution, but it does not remove SNAP-specific slippage or exit risk.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SNAP and USDC into a price range so traders can swap between them. You receive trading fees, but SNAP's price can move sharply, changing the value and composition of your deposit and making it difficult to exit without slippage.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- GosZTcF5CG6BcRwiLC1StaBaUXhggvgqEeSRcSD5dzXi
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- SNAP (SNAPcESr…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 9/11/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The reported APR is split between 35.7% in fees and 7.2% in rewards, with 83% of yield coming from trading fees. Emission decay therefore has limited direct effect on the current headline APR, although weaker incentives could still reduce future participation and volume.
The reported APR is split between 35.7% in fees and 7.2% in rewards, with 83% of yield coming from trading fees. Emission decay therefore has limited direct effect on the current headline APR, although weaker incentives could still reduce future participation and volume.
The reward component would fall from 7.2% toward zero, but the fee component would remain tied to trading activity at 35.7%. Because rewards are not currently the stated source of yield, the larger practical risk is whether volume and liquidity persist after incentives change.
The reward component would fall from 7.2% toward zero, but the fee component would remain tied to trading activity at 35.7%. Because rewards are not currently the stated source of yield, the larger practical risk is whether volume and liquidity persist after incentives change.
Risk is high because SNAP can reprice abruptly and the pool has shallow liquidity relative to its trading activity. The lack of recent impermanent-loss and range-history readings limits measurement, while the live EXIT and CRITICAL scanner signal add pool-selection risk.
Risk is high because SNAP can reprice abruptly and the pool has shallow liquidity relative to its trading activity. The lack of recent impermanent-loss and range-history readings limits measurement, while the live EXIT and CRITICAL scanner signal add pool-selection risk.
For this pool, an exit is warranted when SNAP leaves the chosen range and volume no longer compensates for rebalancing and slippage, or when TVL drains and the live verdict remains EXIT. A sustained deterioration in fee generation is more relevant than a temporary change in reward emissions because 83% of current yield is fee-funded.
For this pool, an exit is warranted when SNAP leaves the chosen range and volume no longer compensates for rebalancing and slippage, or when TVL drains and the live verdict remains EXIT. A sustained deterioration in fee generation is more relevant than a temporary change in reward emissions because 83% of current yield is fee-funded.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because the seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history are unavailable. Fee income of 35.7% could offset divergence over time, but the result depends on SNAP's future path, range management, volume, and exit slippage.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because the seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history are unavailable. Fee income of 35.7% could offset divergence over time, but the result depends on SNAP's future path, range management, volume, and exit slippage.
