new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 assigns Enter 15/100, Hold 20/100, and Exit 80/100, with the live verdict EXIT. That result is consistent with ai_engine=hold being outweighed by scanner=CRITICAL and a strong, unopposed EXIT signal; the pool ranks #1710 of 24532 raydium-amm pools, which does not by itself offset the weak pool-specific signals. The assessment would improve only with sustained fee-generating volume, deeper TVL, and removal of the critical scanner condition; a TVL drain, further yield collapse, or weaker trading activity would reinforce it.
Computed 2026-10-26 12:16 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$48.10K
Total value locked
$567.81
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.9%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 0.5%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Treat the scanner's CRITICAL status and unopposed EXIT signal as the entry filter: do not enter unless you can monitor the pool and exit promptly when TVL falls materially or volume remains below its current 0.01x relationship to liquidity. For a concentrated position, use a narrow range only with a predefined rebalance or exit trigger after FATGF moves sharply against SOL.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.9% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.9% | — | — |
| Volume | $567.81 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $1.42 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 3 SOL-FATGF pools
by AI Farmer Score
#4627 of 91854 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 7% of all Solana pools
overall rank #9251 of 148664
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-FATGF liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and FATGF into a shared pool so other users can swap between them, while you receive a portion of trading fees. Your holdings can become worth less than simply holding both tokens if FATGF moves sharply against SOL, and the current return is mainly tied to limited trading activity.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed yield decomposes into 0.9% from trading fees and 0.0% from incentives, producing 0.9% total APR. 100% of yield comes from trading fees, so there is no current reward contribution supporting the stated return. Reward dependency and the emission horizon are not established, making any future incentive component difficult to underwrite.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and tick-range occupancy are unavailable, so neither recent divergence damage nor concentrated-liquidity utilization can be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-FATGF is exposed to sharp FATGF price moves against SOL, thin exit liquidity, and emission decay if incentives are introduced or reduced; exit timing matters more when fee volume is limited.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset in this pair and generally has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana venues than FATGF. SOL strength or weakness relative to FATGF changes the pool's asset mix and can create impermanent loss even when SOL itself remains liquid elsewhere.
tollFATGF Context
FATGF is the memecoin side of the pair, so its liquidity and price discovery are likely more dependent on this pool and other limited venues than SOL's. A sharp FATGF repricing, stalled trading, or disappearing bids can increase divergence losses and make an LP exit materially harder.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and FATGF into a shared pool so other users can swap between them, while you receive a portion of trading fees. Your holdings can become worth less than simply holding both tokens if FATGF moves sharply against SOL, and the current return is mainly tied to limited trading activity.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- H2W2CeByodEEZG1BF4RVa7JWQosBGFmiibAxcAhNhtKA
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- FATGF (4y9E3tJp…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
9%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
5%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current return is split between 0.9% in trading fees and 0.0% in rewards, so any reduction in future emissions would affect only the reward component. Because the current reward contribution is absent and the emission schedule is not established, fee volume remains the main observable source of yield.
The current return is split between 0.9% in trading fees and 0.0% in rewards, so any reduction in future emissions would affect only the reward component. Because the current reward contribution is absent and the emission schedule is not established, fee volume remains the main observable source of yield.
There is no current reward contribution in the displayed breakdown, so an incentive expiry would leave the pool dependent on 0.9% and trading volume. With 24h volume at $568 against TVL of $48K, the remaining fee return may not compensate for memecoin price divergence.
There is no current reward contribution in the displayed breakdown, so an incentive expiry would leave the pool dependent on 0.9% and trading volume. With 24h volume at $568 against TVL of $48K, the remaining fee return may not compensate for memecoin price divergence.
Risk is high because FATGF can move sharply or lose exit liquidity while SOL remains actively traded elsewhere. This pool has TVL of $48K, volume of $568, a 0.01x volume-to-liquidity ratio, and no available recent measurement for impermanent loss.
Risk is high because FATGF can move sharply or lose exit liquidity while SOL remains actively traded elsewhere. This pool has TVL of $48K, volume of $568, a 0.01x volume-to-liquidity ratio, and no available recent measurement for impermanent loss.
For SOL-FATGF, use sustained TVL erosion, falling fee volume, a sharp FATGF move against SOL, or persistence of the CRITICAL scanner signal as exit conditions. The current live verdict is EXIT, so waiting for a reward improvement is not a sufficient exit plan.
For SOL-FATGF, use sustained TVL erosion, falling fee volume, a sharp FATGF move against SOL, or persistence of the CRITICAL scanner signal as exit conditions. The current live verdict is EXIT, so waiting for a reward improvement is not a sufficient exit plan.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee generation is limited. Compare the position's actual accumulated fees with its change in token value; 0.9% is only an annualized estimate and does not guarantee recovery from divergence.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee generation is limited. Compare the position's actual accumulated fees with its change in token value; 0.9% is only an annualized estimate and does not guarantee recovery from divergence.
