new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT. The scanner is CRITICAL, the AI engine reads hold, and the strong exit signal is unopposed, placing SOL-FATGF at rank #699 of 2403 raydium-amm pools. This indicates that the pool's fee-only return and current liquidity use do not offset its memecoin, activity, and exit-timing risks. The assessment would improve if sustained volume increased relative to TVL, fee income rose without a liquidity drain, and the scanner no longer identified a critical condition; it would worsen with a TVL drain, further volume decline, or collapse of the fee APR.
Computed 2026-07-23 21:17 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$40.05K
Total value locked
$574.87
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up1.3%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 1.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a narrow, actively monitored range only if you can rebalance promptly, and exit if the live verdict remains EXIT or if trading activity falls while TVL remains in place; the current low Vol/TVL profile does not justify passive range exposure.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 1.3% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 1.3% | — | — |
| Volume | $574.87 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $1.44 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 3 SOL-FATGF pools
by AI Farmer Score
#533 of 36746 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1629 of 68818
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-FATGF liquidity pool on raydium-amm. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and FATGF into a shared pool so other users can trade between them, while you receive a portion of trading fees. Your holdings can become more concentrated in whichever token falls in relative value, and the current return comes from fees rather than rewards.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The total APR of 1.3% decomposes into 1.3% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 99% of yield comes from fees, so there is no current reward contribution supporting the displayed APR. Reward dependency and the remaining reward schedule are not established, which limits the usefulness of any emissions-based return projection.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable, and recent tick-in-range coverage is also unavailable, so realized range behavior cannot be quantified from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-FATGF carries concentrated demand, volatility, and liquidity-exit risk around FATGF; emissions can decay or end without replacing fee income, making exit timing important. The low swap activity relative to deposited liquidity also means fees may not compensate for adverse price divergence.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established network asset in this pair and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana than FATGF. SOL price moves change the pair's relative price and can create impermanent loss for LPs when SOL outperforms or underperforms FATGF; deeper SOL liquidity elsewhere does not remove the risk within this pool.
tollFATGF Context
FATGF is the memecoin side of the pair, so its liquidity and price discovery are more dependent on concentrated market interest than SOL's. A sharp FATGF move, weakening demand, or reduced exit liquidity can increase inventory imbalance and make the LP's realized result differ materially from fee APR.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and FATGF into a shared pool so other users can trade between them, while you receive a portion of trading fees. Your holdings can become more concentrated in whichever token falls in relative value, and the current return comes from fees rather than rewards.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- H2W2CeByodEEZG1BF4RVa7JWQosBGFmiibAxcAhNhtKA
- Protocol
- raydium-amm
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- FATGF (4y9E3tJp…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
open_in_newView all raydium-amm pools →By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so the displayed total APR of 1.3% is not presently supported by emissions. If future incentives are introduced and then decay, the fee component of 1.3% would remain the relevant income source unless trading activity also changes.
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so the displayed total APR of 1.3% is not presently supported by emissions. If future incentives are introduced and then decay, the fee component of 1.3% would remain the relevant income source unless trading activity also changes.
There is no current reward contribution in the supplied metrics, so expiration would not directly reduce the existing reward-only APR of 0.0%. The position would depend on 1.3% in trading fees, which is sensitive to the pool's low activity relative to TVL.
There is no current reward contribution in the supplied metrics, so expiration would not directly reduce the existing reward-only APR of 0.0%. The position would depend on 1.3% in trading fees, which is sensitive to the pool's low activity relative to TVL.
Risk is high because SOL has broad external liquidity while FATGF is a memecoin whose demand and exit liquidity can change quickly. Price divergence can create impermanent loss, and low swap activity may leave fee income at 1.3% insufficient to offset that loss.
Risk is high because SOL has broad external liquidity while FATGF is a memecoin whose demand and exit liquidity can change quickly. Price divergence can create impermanent loss, and low swap activity may leave fee income at 1.3% insufficient to offset that loss.
For SOL-FATGF, an exit is warranted when the live verdict remains EXIT, the scanner remains CRITICAL, or volume weakens without a corresponding reduction in TVL. A sustained loss of FATGF liquidity or a deterioration in fee income is also a concrete exit trigger.
For SOL-FATGF, an exit is warranted when the live verdict remains EXIT, the scanner remains CRITICAL, or volume weakens without a corresponding reduction in TVL. A sustained loss of FATGF liquidity or a deterioration in fee income is also a concrete exit trigger.
It cannot be calculated from the supplied data because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future price divergence is unknown. Even at the annualized fee rate of 1.3%, break-even depends on how long fees persist and whether SOL and FATGF return toward their starting relative price.
It cannot be calculated from the supplied data because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future price divergence is unknown. Even at the annualized fee rate of 1.3%, break-even depends on how long fees persist and whether SOL and FATGF return toward their starting relative price.
