new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 48/100, with Enter at 42/100, Hold at 55/100, and Exit at 26/100. The live verdict is HOLD, driven by ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #394 of 997 meteora-dlmm pools. This supports monitoring rather than treating the fee APR as sufficient evidence for a new allocation; the assessment would change with sustained volume growth and deeper TVL, or deteriorate with a TVL drain, collapsing fee income, worsening execution, or a material increase in KLED volatility.
Computed 2026-08-22 03:12 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$25.29K
Total value locked
$4.48K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up63.8%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 56.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a range centered on the current KLED/SOL price, monitor the position at least daily, and rebalance when price leaves the active range or when fee generation weakens materially; exit if pool liquidity drains or fee income no longer compensates for the memecoin exposure.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 63.8% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 49.4% | — | — |
| Volume | $4.48K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $41.97 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#3 of 9 KLED-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#628 of 2800 on meteora-dlmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 4% of all Solana pools
overall rank #3483 of 95923
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the KLED-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing KLED and SOL into a shared trading pool so traders can swap between them. In return, you receive part of the trading fees, but your holdings can shift toward the asset that has fallen in price and may be worth less than simply holding both tokens.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The reported APR decomposes into 49.4% from trading fees and 14.4% from rewards. 77% of yield comes from trading fees, while reward dependency is not established; the current reward component therefore does not provide an identified emissions cushion. For this MEMECOIN pool, fee income should be assessed against the durability of KLED-SOL trading activity rather than assumed to persist as token incentives.
shieldRisk Assessment
A recent seven-day impermanent-loss reading and tick-in-range history are unavailable, so recent price divergence and range efficiency cannot be quantified from the supplied data. The MEMECOIN classification adds the usual risks of sharp KLED repricing, thin liquidity, and rapid shifts in trading activity; emission decay matters because any future reward program could decline or end, while exit timing may become difficult if liquidity or demand contracts.
tollKLED Context
KLED is the memecoin side of this KLED-SOL position, so its price movement relative to SOL directly determines the inventory mix and impermanent-loss exposure. Liquidity depth for KLED outside this pool is not established here; a KLED selloff can therefore reduce the position's value and make exits more price-sensitive.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the comparatively established paired asset and provides the reference price against which KLED is measured. SOL movement can still affect the pool's relative-price path, but KLED-specific volatility is likely to dominate the position's inventory changes; broader SOL liquidity does not remove liquidity risk in this pair.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing KLED and SOL into a shared trading pool so traders can swap between them. In return, you receive part of the trading fees, but your holdings can shift toward the asset that has fallen in price and may be worth less than simply holding both tokens.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- H4uj7z5LExamnP127jAQ5zsk2uqhLrqB3JttMMmZLdNx
- Protocol
- Meteora DLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- KLED (1zJX5gRn…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
3%
APR
0%
APR
4%
APR
5%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 14.4%, while the total APR is 63.8% and fee APR is 49.4%. Because 77% of yield comes from fees, emission decay has limited direct effect on the reported current APR, but any future rewards would not be a durable basis for valuation.
The current reward component is 14.4%, while the total APR is 63.8% and fee APR is 49.4%. Because 77% of yield comes from fees, emission decay has limited direct effect on the reported current APR, but any future rewards would not be a durable basis for valuation.
The reward portion would fall away, but the fee component of 49.4% could continue if KLED-SOL trading volume remains sufficient. With total APR at 63.8% and reward dependency unknown, the key post-incentive test is whether fees remain adequate without emissions.
The reward portion would fall away, but the fee component of 49.4% could continue if KLED-SOL trading volume remains sufficient. With total APR at 63.8% and reward dependency unknown, the key post-incentive test is whether fees remain adequate without emissions.
Risk is elevated because KLED can move sharply, liquidity can thin quickly, and price divergence can create impermanent loss. The pool has $25K TVL and a 0.18x volume-to-liquidity ratio, while recent impermanent-loss and range-history readings are unavailable.
Risk is elevated because KLED can move sharply, liquidity can thin quickly, and price divergence can create impermanent loss. The pool has $25K TVL and a 0.18x volume-to-liquidity ratio, while recent impermanent-loss and range-history readings are unavailable.
For KLED-SOL, consider exiting when pool TVL drains, fee income falls materially below 49.4%, price leaves your usable range without a credible rebalancing case, or KLED liquidity becomes difficult to access. A weakening fee base matters because 77% of yield is fee-derived.
For KLED-SOL, consider exiting when pool TVL drains, fee income falls materially below 49.4%, price leaves your usable range without a credible rebalancing case, or KLED liquidity becomes difficult to access. A weakening fee base matters because 77% of yield is fee-derived.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and the pool's fee income can change with volume. The relevant comparison is cumulative fees from 49.4% against the position's realized loss relative to holding KLED and SOL separately, not the headline 63.8% alone.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and the pool's fee income can change with volume. The relevant comparison is cumulative fees from 49.4% against the position's realized loss relative to holding KLED and SOL separately, not the headline 63.8% alone.
