

PEPE-SOLon Raydium CLMMCLMMHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $67.94K
- APR
- 500.0% APR
- 24h Volume
- $29.38K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 1.00% fee
- Pool address
- HBfkHGsE…pMUt · observed 2026-10-23
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 45/100, with Enter 41/100, Hold 49/100, and Exit 33/100, indicates that the model sees little justification for opening or retaining exposure. The live verdict is HOLD, driven by ai_engine=exit and a strong EXIT signal described as unopposed; the pool ranks #9747 of 9963 raydium-clmm pools. The assessment would change if TVL and sustained trading volume improved, fee generation persisted through market conditions, range activity became measurable, or the score moved toward a hold or enter profile; a TVL drain or fee collapse would reinforce the current verdict.
Computed 2026-10-23 11:40 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$67.94K
Total value locked
$29.38K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up500.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 914.5%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Treat the current HOLD as an exit signal rather than a passive holding recommendation: use a narrow, actively monitored tick range only if you can rebalance promptly, and close the position when pool TVL drains, fee generation weakens, or PEPE-SOL no longer trades actively enough to support 276.1%.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 276.1% | — | — |
| Volume | $29.38K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $763.60 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 12 PEPE-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#153 of 19264 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1085 of 147092
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the PEPE-SOL liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing PEPE and SOL into a shared trading pool and receiving a portion of swap fees. Your holdings can change toward one token when their prices move, and the fee income may fall if trading slows or the pool becomes less liquid.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The Total APR of 500.0% decomposes into fee-only APR of 276.1% and reward-only APR of 223.9%. Fee sustainability is 55%, meaning the displayed yield is attributed to trading fees rather than emissions. Reward dependency is unknown, so no reliable incentive-duration estimate is available; for this MEMECOIN pool, any future emissions would be subject to decay and could alter the APR without improving trading demand.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading is not available, and recent tick-in-range coverage is also unavailable, so recent price divergence and range efficiency cannot be quantified from this sheet. The MEMECOIN classification adds sharp price-movement and liquidity-withdrawal risk, while emission decay can reduce any future reward contribution and make exit timing more important. With fees supplying the displayed yield, weaker volume or a thinner pool would directly reduce LP revenue.
tollPEPE Context
PEPE is the memecoin side of this pair, so its price action determines whether the LP's PEPE and SOL inventory shifts toward one asset after rebalancing. PEPE's liquidity depth elsewhere is not quantified here; a rapid PEPE move or loss of external liquidity can increase inventory imbalance and execution risk for this pool.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the more established network asset in the pair and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana venues, although that broader depth does not remove the risks of this specific pool. If SOL rallies or falls sharply against PEPE, the concentrated position can experience inventory shifts and impermanent loss even when trading fees remain positive.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing PEPE and SOL into a shared trading pool and receiving a portion of swap fees. Your holdings can change toward one token when their prices move, and the fee income may fall if trading slows or the pool becomes less liquid.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- HBfkHGsEefSkLQqQz3xpLzUsA1EmaikfZ4Fni8empMUt
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- PEPE (PEPEqnuu…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 9/21/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current decomposition shows 223.9% from rewards and 276.1% from fees, with 55% fee sustainability. If emissions are introduced or reduced, the reward component can decline over time; fee income still depends on $29K of trading and the pool's 0.43x volume-to-liquidity ratio.
The current decomposition shows 223.9% from rewards and 276.1% from fees, with 55% fee sustainability. If emissions are introduced or reduced, the reward component can decline over time; fee income still depends on $29K of trading and the pool's 0.43x volume-to-liquidity ratio.
Because the displayed reward-only APR is 223.9%, the stated yield is currently attributed to 276.1% in fees rather than farm incentives. If incentives later expire, only the fee component would remain, and that component would fall if trading volume or liquidity declines.
Because the displayed reward-only APR is 223.9%, the stated yield is currently attributed to 276.1% in fees rather than farm incentives. If incentives later expire, only the fee component would remain, and that component would fall if trading volume or liquidity declines.
Risk is elevated because PEPE can move sharply against SOL, causing inventory shifts and impermanent loss, while the pool has TVL of $68K. The HOLD assessment and rank of #9747 of 9963 raydium-clmm pools indicate that this pool has weaker measured conditions than most listed alternatives.
Risk is elevated because PEPE can move sharply against SOL, causing inventory shifts and impermanent loss, while the pool has TVL of $68K. The HOLD assessment and rank of #9747 of 9963 raydium-clmm pools indicate that this pool has weaker measured conditions than most listed alternatives.
For this pool, an exit is consistent with the current HOLD and the unopposed strong EXIT signal. Consider closing when TVL drains, fee income falls materially, trading activity weakens, or PEPE's price movement leaves your chosen range without a prompt rebalancing opportunity.
For this pool, an exit is consistent with the current HOLD and the unopposed strong EXIT signal. Consider closing when TVL drains, fee income falls materially, trading activity weakens, or PEPE's price movement leaves your chosen range without a prompt rebalancing opportunity.
A realistic break-even period cannot be established because the seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income is variable. The headline 500.0% should not be treated as a guaranteed recovery rate; break-even depends on future 276.1%, trading volume, price divergence, and time spent in range.
A realistic break-even period cannot be established because the seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income is variable. The headline 500.0% should not be treated as a guaranteed recovery rate; break-even depends on future 276.1%, trading volume, price divergence, and time spent in range.




