TSLAx-USDCon Raydium CLMMCLMMHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $344.45K
- APR
- 58.0% APR
- 24h Volume
- $164.51K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.25% fee
- Pool address
- HHQUnUbm…mvum · observed 2026-10-22
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A Wealthville Score of 52/100 is below the Enter threshold of 48/100 and the Hold threshold of 57/100, while the Exit threshold is 24/100; the live verdict is HOLD. That assessment is consistent with ai_engine=hold, scanner=CRITICAL, and an unopposed strong EXIT signal. The pool ranks #1720 of 8415 raydium-clmm pools, so its position is not evidence of acceptable risk despite the fee-only APR. The assessment would improve if the scanner ceased to be CRITICAL, the signal were no longer unopposed, trading activity and TVL were sustained, and the score moved above the Hold or Enter thresholds; a TVL drain or yield collapse would worsen it.
Computed 2026-10-22 21:47 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$344.45K
Total value locked
$164.51K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up58.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 25.5%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
If entering, use a range centered on the current TSLAX-USDC price only with active monitoring, set an alert for leaving that range, and close or reassess if the scanner remains CRITICAL or the live verdict remains HOLD at the next review.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 58.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 45.8% | — | — |
| Volume | $164.51K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $411.27 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#3 of 15 TSLAx-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#468 of 19264 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #2231 of 147092
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the TSLAx-USDC liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing TSLAX and USDC into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the value and composition of your deposit can change when TSLAX moves sharply, and your funds may stop earning fees if the price leaves your selected range.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield decomposes into 45.8% from trading fees and 12.2% from rewards, with 79%. Because the reward schedule and dependency are not established, there is no defensible estimate for reward duration or emission decay; the current stated return is fee-derived rather than incentive-derived.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range data are unavailable, so realized loss and range utilization cannot be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, TSLAX can experience abrupt price moves that create impermanent loss, push a concentrated-liquidity position out of range, and reduce fee capture. Emission decay is not currently measurable from the reward data, so exit timing should depend on fee activity, pool liquidity, and the risk signal rather than assumed incentives.
tollTSLAx Context
TSLAX is the volatile asset in this pair, while the pool provides its quoted liquidity against USDC. The available data do not establish TSLAX liquidity depth elsewhere, so this pool's $344K should not be treated as a proxy for broader market depth. A sharp TSLAX move can increase impermanent loss and, in a concentrated position, leave liquidity inactive on one side of the market.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the quote asset intended to provide the pool's stable side of the pair. Its main additional risk is stablecoin depeg or liquidity fragmentation, which can distort the TSLAX-USDC price and the LP's inventory value. USDC's relative stability does not remove the price-impact and impermanent-loss exposure created by TSLAX.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing TSLAX and USDC into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the value and composition of your deposit can change when TSLAX moves sharply, and your funds may stop earning fees if the price leaves your selected range.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- HHQUnUbmWLrYzkscDY1C3deEFbGtiGBGoHjpANogmvum
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- TSLAx (XsDoVfqe…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current stated yield is 58.0%, composed of 45.8% in fees and 12.2% in rewards, with 79%. Since the reward schedule is unknown and the reward component is currently zero, there is no measured emission stream to model; future changes would matter only if rewards are introduced.
The current stated yield is 58.0%, composed of 45.8% in fees and 12.2% in rewards, with 79%. Since the reward schedule is unknown and the reward component is currently zero, there is no measured emission stream to model; future changes would matter only if rewards are introduced.
If incentives are introduced and later expire, the reward component would fall away and the remaining return would depend on trading fees. At present, the stated reward APR is 12.2%, so the published yield is already fee-derived rather than dependent on active farm rewards.
If incentives are introduced and later expire, the reward component would fall away and the remaining return would depend on trading fees. At present, the stated reward APR is 12.2%, so the published yield is already fee-derived rather than dependent on active farm rewards.
Risk is high relative to a stable or major-token pair because TSLAX can move abruptly, causing impermanent loss and potentially taking concentrated liquidity out of range. This pool also carries a HOLD verdict, a scanner status of CRITICAL, and a Wealthville Score of 52/100.
Risk is high relative to a stable or major-token pair because TSLAX can move abruptly, causing impermanent loss and potentially taking concentrated liquidity out of range. This pool also carries a HOLD verdict, a scanner status of CRITICAL, and a Wealthville Score of 52/100.
For this pool, an exit or reassessment is warranted if the CRITICAL scanner status persists, the live verdict remains HOLD, TVL begins draining, or TSLAX leaves the selected range and fee income no longer compensates for management risk. Do not wait for incentives that are not currently contributing to APR.
For this pool, an exit or reassessment is warranted if the CRITICAL scanner status persists, the live verdict remains HOLD, TVL begins draining, or TSLAX leaves the selected range and fee income no longer compensates for management risk. Do not wait for incentives that are not currently contributing to APR.
A realistic break-even time cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range utilization are unavailable. A static gross-fee approximation of 1/45.8% years ignores price movement, out-of-range periods, compounding, and changing volume, so it is not a reliable break-even forecast.
A realistic break-even time cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range utilization are unavailable. A static gross-fee approximation of 1/45.8% years ignores price movement, out-of-range periods, compounding, and changing volume, so it is not a reliable break-even forecast.
