
SOL-CARDSon Orca WhirlpoolWhirlpoolHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $837.60K
- APR
- 500.0% APR
- 24h Volume
- $515.21K 24h vol
- Pool address
- HNXTRVNo…Kinc · observed 2026-10-22
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 55/100 and its Enter 52/100 / Hold 60/100 / Exit 21/100 profile support the live HOLD assessment, not an unqualified entry signal. The stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold; the pool ranks #202 of 3928 orca-whirlpool pools, placing it well above much of the listed pool set while still leaving substantial room below the top group. The assessment would change if TVL drained, fee yield collapsed, volume stopped supporting the position, or reliable IL and range data showed persistent LP underperformance.
Computed 2026-10-22 13:58 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$837.60K
Total value locked
$515.21K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up500.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 244.6%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a range centered near the current SOL/CARDS price, and rebalance when price approaches either outer tick boundary rather than waiting for the position to become one-sided. Exit if fee accrual weakens materially or if volume no longer supports the current 240.7%.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 240.7% | — | — |
| Volume | $515.21K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $5.47K | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 8 SOL-CARDS pools
by AI Farmer Score
#167 of 20205 on orca-whirlpool
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1479 of 147092
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-CARDS liquidity pool on Orca Whirlpool. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and CARDS into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive part of the trading fees. If the two prices move sharply relative to each other, you may end up holding more of the weaker asset than if you had simply held both tokens.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated Total APR decomposes into 240.7% from swap fees and 259.3% from rewards. 48% of yield comes from trading fees, so current returns depend on continued volume rather than an emissions schedule. Reward dependency and lifecycle data are not established, so any future incentive change should be treated as an unquantified APR risk.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss data is not reported, and range exposure cannot be quantified because tick-in-range history is unavailable. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-CARDS is exposed to rapid attention, price, and liquidity changes; concentrated liquidity can leave an LP holding mostly one asset after a directional move. Emission decay is not currently the source of the stated yield, but any future incentives could decay quickly, making exit timing important if trading activity or liquidity begins to contract.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the pool's relatively established base asset and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than this pool. A sharp SOL move can push a concentrated-liquidity position toward one-sided inventory, while SOL strength or weakness relative to CARDS determines which asset the LP accumulates.
tollCARDS Context
CARDS is the pool's memecoin-side asset, so its external liquidity and price discovery are likely more limited and more sensitive to attention than SOL's. A CARDS selloff can leave the LP with more CARDS, while a rapid CARDS rally can leave the LP with more SOL and reduce exposure to the appreciating asset.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and CARDS into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive part of the trading fees. If the two prices move sharply relative to each other, you may end up holding more of the weaker asset than if you had simply held both tokens.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- HNXTRVNoi63PZvBnVmZCUBouyF76zQbXHYtUpZcxKinc
- Protocol
- Orca Whirlpool
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Whirlpool (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- CARDS (CARDSccU…)
- Created
- 6/24/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
102%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll orca-whirlpool poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 259.3%, while fee yield is 240.7% and 48% of yield comes from trading fees. Any future emissions would be additional support rather than the stated current source of return, and their decay could reduce APR if fees do not replace them.
The current reward component is 259.3%, while fee yield is 240.7% and 48% of yield comes from trading fees. Any future emissions would be additional support rather than the stated current source of return, and their decay could reduce APR if fees do not replace them.
Because the current stated reward component is 259.3%, incentive expiry would not be the main explanation for present yield unless the pool's reward configuration changes. If incentives are introduced and later expire, the remaining return would depend primarily on 240.7% and future trading volume.
Because the current stated reward component is 259.3%, incentive expiry would not be the main explanation for present yield unless the pool's reward configuration changes. If incentives are introduced and later expire, the remaining return would depend primarily on 240.7% and future trading volume.
Risk is high relative to a pool built around two deeper, less volatile assets because CARDS can move sharply and its liquidity can contract quickly. The pool's $838K TVL and 0.62x volume-to-TVL ratio indicate active turnover, but they do not remove concentrated-liquidity or memecoin price risk.
Risk is high relative to a pool built around two deeper, less volatile assets because CARDS can move sharply and its liquidity can contract quickly. The pool's $838K TVL and 0.62x volume-to-TVL ratio indicate active turnover, but they do not remove concentrated-liquidity or memecoin price risk.
Consider exiting when price approaches the edge of your range, fee accrual weakens, or volume falls enough that 240.7% no longer compensates for inventory and price risk. A sustained TVL drain or a change from the current HOLD assessment would also be a practical exit signal.
Consider exiting when price approaches the edge of your range, fee accrual weakens, or volume falls enough that 240.7% no longer compensates for inventory and price risk. A sustained TVL drain or a change from the current HOLD assessment would also be a practical exit signal.
No defensible break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported. At 240.7%, fee recovery depends on future volume, the size of the price divergence between SOL and CARDS, and how long the position remains in range.
No defensible break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported. At 240.7%, fee recovery depends on future volume, the size of the price divergence between SOL and CARDS, and how long the position remains in range.




