SOL-EATon Orca WhirlpoolWhirlpoolActive
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $41.39K
- APR
- 16.6% APR
- 24h Volume
- $1.12K 24h vol
- Pool address
- HSWWBSub…nmZG · observed 2026-10-13
Wealthville Score
Verdict AVOID · 62% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 19/100 places SOL-EAT below the middle of the tracked pool set, with Enter at 10/100, Hold at 30/100, Exit at 60/100, and a live verdict of AVOID. The verdict driver is ai_engine=hold, while the pool ranks #2734 of 3928 orca-whirlpool pools, indicating that the model does not currently classify it as an immediate exit despite weak overall standing. The assessment would worsen if TVL drained, volume fell enough to reduce fee APR, EAT liquidity deteriorated, or the position spent more time outside range; it could improve with sustained volume and deeper liquidity.
Computed 2026-10-13 02:21 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$41.39K
Total value locked
$1.12K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up16.6%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 34.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a range centered on the current SOL-EAT price and set an alert for any move outside that range; if the position becomes one-sided, withdraw or recenter rather than leaving inactive liquidity deployed, and exit if fee volume no longer justifies the pool's memecoin exposure.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 16.6% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 15.4% | — | — |
| Volume | $1.12K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $16.91 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 SOL-EAT pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1632 of 20205 on orca-whirlpool
by AI Farmer Score
Top 6% of all Solana pools
overall rank #7664 of 141086
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-EAT liquidity pool on Orca Whirlpool. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and EAT into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the value of your deposit can change unevenly if EAT moves sharply against SOL.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The pool's total APR of 16.6% decomposes into 15.4% from swap fees and 1.2% from rewards. 93% of yield comes from trading fees, so the stated APR is not currently supported by emissions. Reward dependency and the emission lifecycle are not established; if incentives are introduced or later decay, the reward component would change independently of fee generation.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable, and seven-day tick-in-range history is also unavailable, so recent range efficiency cannot be verified. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-EAT is exposed to abrupt EAT price moves, shallow liquidity, adverse selection, and one-sided inventory after a selloff. Because reward lifecycle information is unavailable and current reward APR is 1.2%, LPs should treat exit timing as dependent primarily on fee volume and EAT market activity rather than on a known incentive runway.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established network asset in this pair and has materially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than EAT. A SOL price move changes the pool's relative price and can push a concentrated LP position toward one-sided SOL or EAT exposure, creating rebalancing needs and potential impermanent loss.
tollEAT Context
EAT is the memecoin-side asset and is likely to have less distributed liquidity than SOL, making its price more sensitive to trading flow and liquidity withdrawals. A sharp EAT move can move the position out of its selected range or leave the LP holding mostly one token, while weak EAT volume can reduce fee generation.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and EAT into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the value of your deposit can change unevenly if EAT moves sharply against SOL.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- HSWWBSubMBWAqatcdwa8xRcD53qkg1bQTVTijRGinmZG
- Protocol
- Orca Whirlpool
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Whirlpool (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- EAT (375aiUqZ…)
- Created
- 6/24/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
66%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll orca-whirlpool poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current total APR is 16.6%, consisting of 15.4% in fees and 1.2% in rewards. Since 93% of yield comes from fees and the reward lifecycle is not established, any future emission decay would mainly affect the reward component rather than the current fee-funded component.
The current total APR is 16.6%, consisting of 15.4% in fees and 1.2% in rewards. Since 93% of yield comes from fees and the reward lifecycle is not established, any future emission decay would mainly affect the reward component rather than the current fee-funded component.
The reward portion would fall toward zero if incentives expire, but the current reward APR is already 1.2%. The remaining return would depend on swap fees generated by the pool's trading volume and liquidity.
The reward portion would fall toward zero if incentives expire, but the current reward APR is already 1.2%. The remaining return would depend on swap fees generated by the pool's trading volume and liquidity.
Risk is high relative to a pool pairing SOL with a deeper-liquidity asset because EAT can move abruptly and may have thinner exit liquidity. The pool has $41K in liquidity, $1K in recent volume, and a 0.03x volume-to-liquidity ratio, so both price exposure and fee generation can change quickly.
Risk is high relative to a pool pairing SOL with a deeper-liquidity asset because EAT can move abruptly and may have thinner exit liquidity. The pool has $41K in liquidity, $1K in recent volume, and a 0.03x volume-to-liquidity ratio, so both price exposure and fee generation can change quickly.
Consider exiting when the position leaves its intended range, EAT liquidity or trading activity deteriorates, or the fee APR no longer compensates for the exposure. For SOL-EAT, a TVL drain, sustained volume decline, or sharp EAT selloff would be concrete exit signals.
Consider exiting when the position leaves its intended range, EAT liquidity or trading activity deteriorates, or the fee APR no longer compensates for the exposure. For SOL-EAT, a TVL drain, sustained volume decline, or sharp EAT selloff would be concrete exit signals.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee realization depends on changing volume. The stated APR of 16.6% is an annualized estimate, not a guaranteed recovery period; actual break-even depends on future fees, SOL-EAT price divergence, and time spent in range.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee realization depends on changing volume. The stated APR of 16.6% is an annualized estimate, not a guaranteed recovery period; actual break-even depends on future fees, SOL-EAT price divergence, and time spent in range.
