MARIE-SPXon Raydium CLMMCLMMActive
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $13.75K
- APR
- 15.7% APR
- 24h Volume
- $838.05 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 1.00% fee
- Pool address
- HSzzwrHJ…TVJk · observed 2026-10-27
Wealthville Score
Verdict AVOID · 59% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 19/100 gives this pool a mixed profile: Enter is 10/100, Hold is 30/100, and Exit is 60/100. The live verdict is AVOID, driven by ai_engine=hold, which indicates that existing conditions do not justify a clear accumulation or disposal signal. Its rank of #1591 of 8415 raydium-clmm pools places it above many listed pools but does not remove the underlying concentration and memecoin risks. The assessment would weaken if TVL drains, trading volume contracts, or fee APR collapses; it could improve if liquidity and sustained fee volume increase without a corresponding rise in price divergence.
Computed 2026-10-27 00:17 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$13.75K
Total value locked
$838.05
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up15.7%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 4.0%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a defined rebalance rule: review the position whenever volume-to-TVL activity falls materially below 0.06x or price leaves your chosen tick range, and exit rather than widen the range if fee income no longer compensates for memecoin price divergence.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 15.7% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 14.6% | — | — |
| Volume | $838.05 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $8.42 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 MARIE-SPX pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1308 of 19676 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 12% of all Solana pools
overall rank #17935 of 150817
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the MARIE-SPX liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing MARIE and SPX into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but a large price move in either token can leave you with a less valuable mix of assets than if you had simply held them.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The reported APR decomposes into 14.6% from trading fees and 1.1% from rewards. 93% of yield comes from trading fees, so current returns depend on swap activity rather than an emissions program. Reward dependency is not established, and no reward-expiry schedule is available; fee income can fall quickly if volume or liquidity declines.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and the share of liquidity currently inside the active range are not available, so the position cannot be evaluated from N/A or N/A. As a MEMECOIN pool, MARIE-SPX carries high divergence and volatility risk; emission decay would matter if incentives are introduced, while exit timing matters because a falling token price or depleted liquidity can reduce fee income and make repositioning costly.
tollMARIE Context
MARIE is one side of this concentrated-liquidity pair, so LPs hold exposure to MARIE price movement rather than simply collecting fees in cash. MARIE's liquidity depth elsewhere is not established here; a sharp MARIE move can push the position toward one asset and increase impermanent loss or range exhaustion.
tollSPX Context
SPX is the other asset in the MARIE-SPX pair and determines the pair's relative price alongside MARIE. SPX liquidity elsewhere is not established here, so weak external depth or abrupt SPX price action can increase slippage, shift the position out of range, and reduce the usefulness of the quoted fee APR.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing MARIE and SPX into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but a large price move in either token can leave you with a less valuable mix of assets than if you had simply held them.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- HSzzwrHJ12Fud6gX57YLi4zbFZX8269zhygoddM3TVJk
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- MARIE (9yzErCcH…)
- Token B
- SPX (J3NKxxXZ…)
- Created
- 9/11/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
This pool's reported yield is fee-funded: 14.6% comes from fees and 1.1% comes from rewards, with 93% of yield from trading fees. If emissions are introduced later, their decay would reduce the reward component, while fee APR would still depend on trading volume.
This pool's reported yield is fee-funded: 14.6% comes from fees and 1.1% comes from rewards, with 93% of yield from trading fees. If emissions are introduced later, their decay would reduce the reward component, while fee APR would still depend on trading volume.
No active reward contribution is reported, so the current APR is not presented as dependent on farm incentives. If incentives are added and later expire, the reward portion would disappear and the remaining return would be the fee component, 14.6%, subject to changes in volume and TVL.
No active reward contribution is reported, so the current APR is not presented as dependent on farm incentives. If incentives are added and later expire, the reward portion would disappear and the remaining return would be the fee component, 14.6%, subject to changes in volume and TVL.
Risk is substantial because both assets can move sharply and liquidity may be limited, with the pool holding $14K and generating $838 of daily volume. Price divergence can create impermanent loss, while concentrated liquidity can stop earning fees after price leaves the selected range.
Risk is substantial because both assets can move sharply and liquidity may be limited, with the pool holding $14K and generating $838 of daily volume. Price divergence can create impermanent loss, while concentrated liquidity can stop earning fees after price leaves the selected range.
Use a predefined trigger rather than relying on the headline APR: consider exiting when volume falls materially below the current 0.06x, TVL drains, or price leaves the active range and expected fees no longer justify holding the position. A sustained collapse in 14.6% is also an exit signal.
Use a predefined trigger rather than relying on the headline APR: consider exiting when volume falls materially below the current 0.06x, TVL drains, or price leaves the active range and expected fees no longer justify holding the position. A sustained collapse in 14.6% is also an exit signal.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range occupancy are not available. The relevant comparison is whether cumulative fee income, currently represented by 14.6%, offsets the position's realized divergence and withdrawal costs over your intended holding period.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range occupancy are not available. The relevant comparison is whether cumulative fee income, currently represented by 14.6%, offsets the position's realized divergence and withdrawal costs over your intended holding period.
