Wealthville Score
Verdict EXIT · 70% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 15/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 14/100, Exit at 89/100, and a live verdict of EXIT. Its #969-of-3343 meteora-dlmm ranking reflects a pool that has fee-based yield but lacks stable capital behavior: TVL fell sharply over the recent window while showing a much larger rebound over the preceding window, producing a round-trip pattern and causing the bleed cap to be skipped. The assessment would improve with sustained TVL retention, consistent volume, and durable fee APR; it would worsen with another TVL drain, lower trading activity, or a collapse in fee yield.
Computed 2026-11-09 16:54 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$7.77K
Total value locked
$46.05K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up500.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 423.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Treat a continued TVL drain, renewed round-trip TVL behavior, or a material collapse in fee-only APR as an exit signal; do not widen the range to chase volume when MASK volatility is increasing. Reassess the position whenever fee generation no longer compensates for the pool's changing MASK-SOL inventory exposure.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 429.5% | — | — |
| Volume | $46.05K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $90.88 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 5 MASK-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#275 of 4597 on meteora-dlmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1836 of 155680
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the MASK-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing MASK and SOL into a shared trading pool and accepting fees from traders in exchange. The amount of each token you hold can change as prices move, and a memecoin price drop or loss of pool liquidity can outweigh the fees you receive.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Total APR decomposes into 429.5% from trading fees and 70.5% from rewards, with 86% of yield attributed to fees. Reward dependency is not established, and the current reward component contributes no displayed APR, so emission decay is not presently the main source of APR compression; future fee yield remains dependent on trading volume and retained liquidity.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading is unavailable, and seven-day tick-in-range exposure is also unavailable, so recent range efficiency cannot be verified. As a MEMECOIN pool, MASK-SOL is exposed to sharp MASK-SOL price divergence, liquidity withdrawal, and changes in trader demand; emission decay can remove any future subsidy, making exit timing dependent on fee persistence, TVL stability, and price behavior rather than the headline APR.
tollMASK Context
MASK is the memecoin side of this pair, so its price movement relative to SOL directly drives inventory shifts and impermanent-loss risk for LPs. External MASK liquidity depth is not established by the supplied metrics and should not be inferred from pool TVL; a rapid MASK repricing or liquidity withdrawal can impair the position even while fees accrue.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the quote-side asset against which MASK performance is measured in this pool. SOL generally has broader market liquidity than a memecoin, but no comparable external-depth figure is supplied here; SOL strength or MASK weakness can leave the LP holding more MASK while fee income may not offset the resulting divergence.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing MASK and SOL into a shared trading pool and accepting fees from traders in exchange. The amount of each token you hold can change as prices move, and a memecoin price drop or loss of pool liquidity can outweigh the fees you receive.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- HV49ZDgfqzeWF2BFVq4CtcEbrTm6oXGc68MiimWXh5qe
- Protocol
- Meteora DLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- MASK (HuAXPyDW…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 10/5/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
0%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current displayed yield is 500.0%, composed of 429.5% in fees and 70.5% in rewards, so emission decay does not currently remove a displayed reward component. If incentives are introduced or resumed, decay would reduce that reward portion while fee APR would still depend on trading activity.
The current displayed yield is 500.0%, composed of 429.5% in fees and 70.5% in rewards, so emission decay does not currently remove a displayed reward component. If incentives are introduced or resumed, decay would reduce that reward portion while fee APR would still depend on trading activity.
The current reward-only component is 70.5%, so there is no displayed reward APR to subtract at present. After any future incentives expire, the position would rely on 429.5% and would become more sensitive to falling volume, TVL withdrawals, and MASK-SOL price divergence.
The current reward-only component is 70.5%, so there is no displayed reward APR to subtract at present. After any future incentives expire, the position would rely on 429.5% and would become more sensitive to falling volume, TVL withdrawals, and MASK-SOL price divergence.
Risk is elevated because MASK can move sharply against SOL and external MASK liquidity depth is not established here. The pool's current $8K and 5.93x indicate the position depends on ongoing trading activity, while recent TVL instability makes exit liquidity an important concern.
Risk is elevated because MASK can move sharply against SOL and external MASK liquidity depth is not established here. The pool's current $8K and 5.93x indicate the position depends on ongoing trading activity, while recent TVL instability makes exit liquidity an important concern.
For MASK-SOL, consider exiting when TVL resumes a sustained decline, fee-only APR falls materially, or MASK volatility produces unfavorable inventory concentration. The current EXIT and the round-trip TVL pattern argue for using fee persistence and liquidity stability as exit signals rather than waiting for rewards to decay.
For MASK-SOL, consider exiting when TVL resumes a sustained decline, fee-only APR falls materially, or MASK volatility produces unfavorable inventory concentration. The current EXIT and the round-trip TVL pattern argue for using fee persistence and liquidity stability as exit signals rather than waiting for rewards to decay.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss and tick-range readings are unavailable. 429.5% is an annualized fee estimate rather than a guarantee, and actual break-even depends on MASK-SOL price divergence, range exposure, volume, and whether $8K remains stable.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss and tick-range readings are unavailable. 429.5% is an annualized fee estimate rather than a guarantee, and actual break-even depends on MASK-SOL price divergence, range exposure, volume, and whether $8K remains stable.
