swarms-DRIFTon Orca WhirlpoolWhirlpoolHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $22.67K
- APR
- 93.1% APR
- 24h Volume
- $642.23 24h vol
- Pool address
- Hqz8No8T…iLwn · observed 2026-10-26
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 41/100, with Enter at 35/100, Hold at 48/100, and Exit at 33/100. The live verdict is HOLD, driven by ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #2488 of 3928 orca-whirlpool pools, placing it below many protocol alternatives rather than near the strongest pool set. The assessment is consistent with fee-funded yield but limited liquidity and uncertain durability: a TVL drain, sustained volume contraction, or collapse in fee APR would weaken it, while deeper liquidity and persistent fee volume could improve it.
Computed 2026-10-26 18:17 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$22.67K
Total value locked
$642.23
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up93.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 59.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a range that can be monitored frequently, and set an exit trigger for a sustained move outside the active range or a clear decline in trading activity relative to $23K; do not wait for fee income to compensate for an expanding directional position.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 93.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 65.8% | — | — |
| Volume | $642.23 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $12.84 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 swarms-DRIFT pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1294 of 20205 on orca-whirlpool
by AI Farmer Score
Top 5% of all Solana pools
overall rank #6259 of 150817
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the swarms-DRIFT liquidity pool on Orca Whirlpool. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SWARMS and DRIFT into the pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive part of the trading fees. Your holdings can shift toward whichever token performs worse, and withdrawing may be difficult or costly if the pool is thin or prices move sharply.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The quoted yield decomposes into 65.8% from trading fees and 27.2% from rewards, with 71% of yield sourced from fees. Because the reward component is absent, emission decay is not currently the mechanism supporting APR; the fee rate can still fall quickly if SWARMS-DRIFT volume declines or liquidity grows faster than volume. Reward dependency is not established.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss and tick-in-range history is not available for this pool, so the realized cost of holding both assets and the frequency of active-range exposure cannot be measured from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, SWARMS-DRIFT carries sharp price-move, liquidity-concentration, and correlated-selloff risk; exit timing matters because fee income may weaken before LPs can rebalance or withdraw efficiently. With no reward component, there is no incentive stream to offset a prolonged volume or price shock.
tollswarms Context
SWARMS is one side of the pool and is likely to drive much of the position's directional risk through memecoin price movement. Liquidity depth for SWARMS outside this pool is not established here, so a price move can produce substantial inventory imbalance and make exits more costly. A sharp SWARMS move against DRIFT can also leave the LP holding more of the weaker asset.
tollDRIFT Context
DRIFT is the other pool asset and provides the reference side against which SWARMS price changes determine the LP's inventory mix. Its liquidity depth elsewhere is not established here, so DRIFT volatility or thin external markets could affect both the pool price and the ability to exit near that price. If DRIFT rallies or falls independently of SWARMS, the resulting divergence increases inventory rebalancing pressure.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SWARMS and DRIFT into the pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive part of the trading fees. Your holdings can shift toward whichever token performs worse, and withdrawing may be difficult or costly if the pool is thin or prices move sharply.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- Hqz8No8TSxrErGCTaC9KCZWbfyHxzAFiZpFwh5VGiLwn
- Protocol
- Orca Whirlpool
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Whirlpool (CLMM)
- Token A
- swarms (74SBV4zD…)
- Token B
- DRIFT (DriFtupJ…)
- Created
- 6/24/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
77%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll orca-whirlpool poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current yield is 65.8% in fees plus 27.2% in rewards, so emission decay does not currently reduce the reward portion because it is absent. APR remains dependent on trading activity and can decline if volume falls relative to $23K.
The current yield is 65.8% in fees plus 27.2% in rewards, so emission decay does not currently reduce the reward portion because it is absent. APR remains dependent on trading activity and can decline if volume falls relative to $23K.
The supplied figures show no reward-funded APR, so there is no current incentive component to expire. If incentives are introduced or later removed, the affected reward portion would fall toward zero while fee income would remain tied to pool volume.
The supplied figures show no reward-funded APR, so there is no current incentive component to expire. If incentives are introduced or later removed, the affected reward portion would fall toward zero while fee income would remain tied to pool volume.
Risk is elevated because SWARMS can move sharply, external liquidity is not established here, and the pool has $23K in liquidity against $642 of daily volume. Fee income is fully trading-funded, but fees may not offset losses from a large price divergence or a difficult exit.
Risk is elevated because SWARMS can move sharply, external liquidity is not established here, and the pool has $23K in liquidity against $642 of daily volume. Fee income is fully trading-funded, but fees may not offset losses from a large price divergence or a difficult exit.
For SWARMS-DRIFT, consider exiting when price remains outside your active range, trading activity deteriorates relative to $23K, or the pool's fee APR no longer compensates for the directional exposure. A sharp liquidity drain is also an exit signal because it can increase slippage and make rebalancing harder.
For SWARMS-DRIFT, consider exiting when price remains outside your active range, trading activity deteriorates relative to $23K, or the pool's fee APR no longer compensates for the directional exposure. A sharp liquidity drain is also an exit signal because it can increase slippage and make rebalancing harder.
A reliable break-even time cannot be calculated because this pool lacks recent impermanent-loss and range-history measurements, and future fee volume is uncertain. The theoretical fee stream is 65.8%, but actual recovery depends on price divergence, time in range, and whether $642 persists.
A reliable break-even time cannot be calculated because this pool lacks recent impermanent-loss and range-history measurements, and future fee volume is uncertain. The theoretical fee stream is 65.8%, but actual recovery depends on price divergence, time in range, and whether $642 persists.
