WealthVille
SOL
S
AMBIOS
A

SOL-AMBIOSon Raydium AMM

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $13.88K
APR
1.8% APR
24h Volume
$35.34 24h vol
Fee tier
1.00% fee
Pool address
HtrEqdwz…kfq4 · observed 2026-11-04
17F · Poor

Wealthville Score

Verdict EXIT · 70% confidence

ai_engine=holdscanner=CRITICAL
How this score works →
Enter15

new capital

Hold20

keep position

Exit80

urgency to leave

The Wealthville Score of 17/100 gives this pool a middle-range assessment, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100. The live verdict is EXIT, driven by ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #785 of 18146 raydium-amm pools. That ranking indicates a relative position within the tracked pool set, not assurance of liquidity or return quality; a TVL drain, further volume collapse, or a fall in fee APR would weaken the assessment, while sustained volume growth and deeper liquidity could improve it.

Computed 2026-11-02 14:10 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$13.88K

Total value locked

$35.34

24h volume

×0.0 turnover

Yieldhelp

trending_up

1.8%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

≈ -96.2%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

1.00% fee

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 2344m ago
block

AI Verdict

Avoid

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

check_circleFee-driven yield: 99% of APR from trading fees
warningElevated risk score: 81/100
tips_and_updates

Do not leave this position unattended: review it daily and set an exit rule if 24h volume stays below the current $35 for three consecutive days, or if pool TVL falls materially from $14K.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

table_chart

Performance Breakdown

Metric24h / Day7d / Week30d / Month
Total APR1.8%——
Fee APR1.8%——
Volume$35.34——
Fees Earned$0.35——

Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
3.8%(trailing 7d fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−100.0%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
-96.2%(drags exceed yield)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
0.00x(protocol avg 3.2x)
Fee Yield per $1 TVL / Day
$0.0000
Fee APR Sustainability
99% from trading fees(sustainable)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#1 of 1 SOL-AMBIOS pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#12752 of 95936 on raydium-amm

by AI Farmer Score

leaderboard

Top 13% of all Solana pools

overall rank #18625 of 153992

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-AMBIOS liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and AMBIOS into a shared pool so other people can trade between them. You may receive trading fees, but the amounts and proportions of the two tokens you can withdraw can change, especially if AMBIOS moves sharply against SOL.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

The quoted yield decomposes into 1.8% fee APR and 0.0% reward APR. 99% of yield comes from trading fees, so the current return does not depend on a live reward stream; reward-dependency duration is not established. Future emissions, if introduced, could decay and should not be treated as permanent income.

shieldRisk Assessment

A recent seven-day impermanent-loss reading and tick-in-range reading are not reported, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-AMBIOS carries risks of abrupt token-demand loss, shallow exit liquidity, and rapid changes in fee generation. Emission decay is also relevant if incentives are added later, making exit timing more important than a static APR suggests.

tollSOL Context

SOL is the established network asset in this pair and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana venues than AMBIOS. For this LP, a sharp SOL move against AMBIOS can change the inventory mix and create impermanent loss, while SOL's broader liquidity may make its side of the position easier to value and trade.

tollAMBIOS Context

AMBIOS is the memecoin-side asset and is likely to be the less liquid and more volatile component of the pair. A fall in AMBIOS demand can reduce pool depth, increase the difficulty of exiting, and leave the LP holding more AMBIOS after relative price declines.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and AMBIOS into a shared pool so other people can trade between them. You may receive trading fees, but the amounts and proportions of the two tokens you can withdraw can change, especially if AMBIOS moves sharply against SOL.

token

Token Details

SOL
SOLWrapped SOLSolana

Solana is a high-performance blockchain supporting builders around the world creating crypto apps that scale today.

AMBIOS
AMBIOSSolana
Explorer

AMBIOS is one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
HtrEqdwzmtuqFQiYxGK45x9x8om5C4qsdpKQnXkBkfq4
Protocol
Raydium AMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
—
Pool Type
AMM
Token A
SOL (So111111…)
Token B
AMBIOS (amb1bbMC…)
Created
5/22/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

The current quoted return is 1.8%, consisting of 1.8% in fees and 0.0% in rewards. Because 99% comes from fees, emission decay would mainly matter if future reward incentives are added; any reward portion could then fall without a matching increase in trading activity.

The current quoted return is 1.8%, consisting of 1.8% in fees and 0.0% in rewards. Because 99% comes from fees, emission decay would mainly matter if future reward incentives are added; any reward portion could then fall without a matching increase in trading activity.

The current reward component is 0.0%, so the quoted return is presently fee-led rather than dependent on a stated reward stream. If incentives are introduced and later expire, the remaining return would depend on fees generated by $35 of 24h volume against $14K of liquidity.

The current reward component is 0.0%, so the quoted return is presently fee-led rather than dependent on a stated reward stream. If incentives are introduced and later expire, the remaining return would depend on fees generated by $35 of 24h volume against $14K of liquidity.

Risk is material because AMBIOS may be more volatile and less liquid than SOL, while the pool's current volume-to-liquidity ratio is 0.00x. The fee-funded APR of 1.8% does not remove impermanent loss, token-price risk, or the possibility of a difficult exit.

Risk is material because AMBIOS may be more volatile and less liquid than SOL, while the pool's current volume-to-liquidity ratio is 0.00x. The fee-funded APR of 1.8% does not remove impermanent loss, token-price risk, or the possibility of a difficult exit.

Use a predefined trigger rather than relying only on the displayed 1.8%. For this pool, an extended decline from $35 in daily volume, a TVL drain from $14K, or a sharp loss of AMBIOS liquidity is a concrete reason to reassess or exit before emissions or trading fees deteriorate further.

Use a predefined trigger rather than relying only on the displayed 1.8%. For this pool, an extended decline from $35 in daily volume, a TVL drain from $14K, or a sharp loss of AMBIOS liquidity is a concrete reason to reassess or exit before emissions or trading fees deteriorate further.

There is no defensible fixed break-even period because recent impermanent loss is not reported and fee generation can change with volume. Any estimate must compare the unobserved loss against cumulative fee income, currently quoted as 1.8%, rather than assuming 1.8% will remain constant.

There is no defensible fixed break-even period because recent impermanent loss is not reported and fee generation can change with volume. Any estimate must compare the unobserved loss against cumulative fee income, currently quoted as 1.8%, rather than assuming 1.8% will remain constant.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights