USDC-GILTSon Orca WhirlpoolWhirlpool
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $30.06K
- APR
- 2.3% APR
- 24h Volume
- $179.65 24h vol
- Pool address
- J3pioQjJ…TbeG · observed 2026-11-04
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 gives this pool a Hold verdict of EXIT, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100. The ai_engine=hold driver is consistent with a pool that has fee-only stated yield but no observed trading activity, so the score does not establish that the quoted APR is currently being realized. Its rank of #126 of 4356 orca-whirlpool pools places it above most listed pools, but that ranking should not override pool-specific liquidity risk. A sustained return of volume, stable or growing liquidity, or clearer lifecycle data could improve the assessment; a TVL drain, continued inactivity, or collapse in fee yield would weaken it.
Computed 2026-11-03 20:45 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$30.06K
Total value locked
$179.65
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up2.3%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 0.6%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only after checking the live tick map and set an alert for the position leaving its active range; rebalance or exit when that occurs if fee generation has not resumed. Also reassess promptly if displayed liquidity drains or 24-hour volume remains at $180, since the current 0.01x ratio provides no evidence of active fee production.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 2.3% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 2.3% | — | — |
| Volume | $179.65 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.29 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 USDC-GILTS pools
by AI Farmer Score
#2160 of 20718 on orca-whirlpool
by AI Farmer Score
Top 12% of all Solana pools
overall rank #17653 of 153992
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the USDC-GILTS liquidity pool on Orca Whirlpool. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing USDC and GILTS into a shared trading pool and receiving a portion of fees when traders use it. The quoted return is fee-based, but current trading activity is absent, and a large GILTS price move can leave you holding more of the riskier token.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Total APR of 2.3% decomposes into 2.3% from fees and 0.0% from rewards. Fee sustainability is 99%, so the quoted return is entirely dependent on trading fees rather than farm emissions. With no reward APR currently reported, emission decay is not the main near-term variable; the key uncertainty is whether fee generation resumes while liquidity remains deployed.
shieldRisk Assessment
The available history does not provide a reported seven-day impermanent-loss figure or tick-in-range reading, so recent price-path and range-utilization risk cannot be quantified from those metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, GILTS can experience abrupt price moves against USDC, causing inventory shifts and concentrated-liquidity exposure. Lifecycle status is unknown, so emission decay and exit timing should be treated as unverified; the absence of reward yield also leaves fee activity and liquidity conditions as the main reasons to remain or exit.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the stable asset in this pair and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana than a memecoin asset. If GILTS falls, the position tends to accumulate GILTS relative to USDC; if GILTS rises, it tends to sell GILTS into strength, creating the usual concentrated-liquidity inventory effect.
tollGILTS Context
GILTS is the volatile side of this pair and is classified within the MEMECOIN pool family. Its price action drives most of the position's directional and range risk: sharp moves can push the position out of range or leave the LP holding more of the declining asset. Liquidity elsewhere for GILTS should be verified before entry because thin external markets can make exit execution difficult.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing USDC and GILTS into a shared trading pool and receiving a portion of fees when traders use it. The quoted return is fee-based, but current trading activity is absent, and a large GILTS price move can leave you holding more of the riskier token.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- J3pioQjJkv8iXjF2g749MqjG6WXwRHZcn4mR922wTbeG
- Protocol
- Orca Whirlpool
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Whirlpool (CLMM)
- Token A
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Token B
- GILTS (GiLTSeSF…)
- Created
- 7/18/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
49%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll orca-whirlpool poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 0.0%, so the reported 2.3% is generated by 2.3% in fees rather than farm emissions. Future emission decay is therefore not currently reducing the quoted reward component, but fee income can still fall if trading does not return.
The current reward component is 0.0%, so the reported 2.3% is generated by 2.3% in fees rather than farm emissions. Future emission decay is therefore not currently reducing the quoted reward component, but fee income can still fall if trading does not return.
The pool already reports 0.0% in reward APR, so expiration would not remove a currently reported reward stream. The remaining return would depend on 2.3% and actual trading volume, while $180 and 0.01x currently show no observed activity.
The pool already reports 0.0% in reward APR, so expiration would not remove a currently reported reward stream. The remaining return would depend on 2.3% and actual trading volume, while $180 and 0.01x currently show no observed activity.
The main risks are GILTS price volatility, concentrated-range exposure, thin exit liquidity, and holding more GILTS after a decline. Recent impermanent-loss and tick-utilization history is not available in the current metrics, so those risks cannot be estimated from a reported historical reading.
The main risks are GILTS price volatility, concentrated-range exposure, thin exit liquidity, and holding more GILTS after a decline. Recent impermanent-loss and tick-utilization history is not available in the current metrics, so those risks cannot be estimated from a reported historical reading.
For USDC-GILTS, reassess when the position leaves its active tick range, displayed liquidity drains, or trading remains inactive at $180. An exit is also reasonable if fee income falls materially from 2.3% or if the GILTS market becomes difficult to trade outside the pool.
For USDC-GILTS, reassess when the position leaves its active tick range, displayed liquidity drains, or trading remains inactive at $180. An exit is also reasonable if fee income falls materially from 2.3% or if the GILTS market becomes difficult to trade outside the pool.
There is no defensible break-even estimate without a reported impermanent-loss history and sustained trading volume. The nominal fee rate is 2.3%, but with $180 in recent volume, fees may not accrue fast enough to offset a future GILTS price divergence.
There is no defensible break-even estimate without a reported impermanent-loss history and sustained trading volume. The nominal fee rate is 2.3%, but with $180 in recent volume, fees may not accrue fast enough to offset a future GILTS price divergence.
