Wealthville Score
Verdict AVOID · 62% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The 19/100 Wealthville Score places KET-SOL in a middle-risk, middle-opportunity position rather than at the top of the meteora-dlmm set: it ranks #113 of 997 pools. Enter 10/100 / Hold 30/100 / Exit 60/100 indicates that the model's live AVOID assessment favors maintaining an existing position over initiating a new one or exiting immediately. The stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold. A material TVL drain, sustained volume contraction, fee APR collapse, or worsening KET price behavior would weaken that assessment; stronger fee persistence and stable liquidity would support it.
Computed 2026-09-05 08:36 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$6.63K
Total value locked
$188.41
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up139.6%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -14.1%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a deliberately narrow range only if you can monitor it, and rebalance or exit when the position approaches the edge of that range or when 24h volume no longer supports the current fee income. Do not treat the displayed 139.6% as durable if the 0.03x ratio falls materially.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 139.6% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 87.5% | — | — |
| Volume | $188.41 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $5.18 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 5 KET-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#697 of 3058 on meteora-dlmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 4% of all Solana pools
overall rank #3260 of 107256
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the KET-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing KET and SOL into the pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive part of the trading fees. Your holdings can become mostly KET or mostly SOL after a large price move, and the fee income may not offset that change in value.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed yield decomposes into 87.5% fee APR and 52.1% reward APR. 63% of yield comes from trading fees, so the current return depends on continued swap volume rather than a stated reward schedule. Because the reward component is currently zero, emission decay is not the present source of APR compression; fee income can still fall if volume or fee capture declines.
shieldRisk Assessment
A recent seven-day impermanent-loss measurement is unavailable, and seven-day tick-in-range history is also unavailable, so realized loss and range efficiency cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, KET-SOL carries substantial token-specific volatility and asymmetric repricing risk; concentrated liquidity can stop earning fees when the pair moves outside the active range. Emission decay and exit timing matter for memecoin pools, but this pool currently shows no reward component, making fee-volume deterioration the more immediate assessment risk.
tollKET Context
KET is the memecoin side of this pair, so its price movement relative to SOL determines both the inventory mix and whether concentrated liquidity remains active. Liquidity depth for KET elsewhere is not established by the supplied pool metrics; sharp KET moves can create impermanent loss, move the position out of range, or leave the LP holding more of the depreciating asset.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset paired against KET and provides the reference price for the pool's relative movement. SOL has broader ecosystem liquidity than a typical memecoin, but that does not remove pair-specific risk: a strong SOL move can shift the position out of range, while KET weakness can concentrate the LP in KET.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing KET and SOL into the pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive part of the trading fees. Your holdings can become mostly KET or mostly SOL after a large price move, and the fee income may not offset that change in value.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- J8FbNWdrpXo1ECMEhpsJdQyJ4TcXYtDUYfyAStAJR9Fh
- Protocol
- Meteora DLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- KET (9Pfync3e…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 7/18/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
1%
APR
0%
APR
5%
APR
45%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current KET-SOL breakdown is 87.5% from fees and 52.1% from rewards, so the displayed 139.6% is presently fee-driven. If future incentives are introduced and later decay, only the reward component would decline directly; fee APR would still depend on trading volume.
The current KET-SOL breakdown is 87.5% from fees and 52.1% from rewards, so the displayed 139.6% is presently fee-driven. If future incentives are introduced and later decay, only the reward component would decline directly; fee APR would still depend on trading volume.
The current reward component is 52.1%, so there is no displayed reward stream to remove at present. If incentives are added later, their expiry would reduce total APR toward the fee component, 87.5%, unless trading activity changes.
The current reward component is 52.1%, so there is no displayed reward stream to remove at present. If incentives are added later, their expiry would reduce total APR toward the fee component, 87.5%, unless trading activity changes.
Risk is high relative to a stable or major-token pair because KET can move sharply against SOL and may have limited liquidity outside this pool. The pool's fee-only return, 87.5%, is compensation for that exposure, not protection against impermanent loss or KET price decline.
Risk is high relative to a stable or major-token pair because KET can move sharply against SOL and may have limited liquidity outside this pool. The pool's fee-only return, 87.5%, is compensation for that exposure, not protection against impermanent loss or KET price decline.
For KET-SOL, consider exiting when volume and fee generation deteriorate, when price approaches or leaves your active tick range, or when KET's market structure weakens. A TVL drain or collapse in the 0.03x activity ratio would also challenge the case for remaining invested.
For KET-SOL, consider exiting when volume and fee generation deteriorate, when price approaches or leaves your active tick range, or when KET's market structure weakens. A TVL drain or collapse in the 0.03x activity ratio would also challenge the case for remaining invested.
A precise break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss and range-history data are unavailable. The relevant comparison is cumulative fee income, represented by 87.5%, against the position's actual loss from KET-SOL price divergence; the displayed 139.6% should not be treated as a guaranteed payback period.
A precise break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss and range-history data are unavailable. The relevant comparison is cumulative fee income, represented by 87.5%, against the position's actual loss from KET-SOL price divergence; the displayed 139.6% should not be treated as a guaranteed payback period.
