WealthVille
KET
K
SOL
S

KET-SOLon Meteora DLMMActive

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $4.45K
APR
17.2% APR
Pool address
J8FbNWdr…R9Fh · observed 2026-10-23
17F · Poor

Wealthville Score

Verdict EXIT · 70% confidence

ai_engine=holdscanner=CRITICAL
How this score works →
Enter15

new capital

Hold20

keep position

Exit80

urgency to leave

The 17/100 Wealthville Score places KET-SOL in a middle-risk, middle-opportunity position rather than at the top of the meteora-dlmm set: it ranks #113 of 997 pools. Enter 15/100 / Hold 20/100 / Exit 80/100 indicates that the model's live EXIT assessment favors maintaining an existing position over initiating a new one or exiting immediately. The stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold. A material TVL drain, sustained volume contraction, fee APR collapse, or worsening KET price behavior would weaken that assessment; stronger fee persistence and stable liquidity would support it.

Computed 2026-09-28 11:18 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$4.45K

Total value locked

$0.00

24h volume

Yieldhelp

trending_up

17.2%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

—

fees earned, last 24h

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 358m agoTVL ↑0.4%0
block

AI Verdict

Avoid

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

check_circleFee-driven yield: 92% of APR from trading fees
tips_and_updates

Enter with a deliberately narrow range only if you can monitor it, and rebalance or exit when the position approaches the edge of that range or when 24h volume no longer supports the current fee income. Do not treat the displayed 17.2% as durable if the 0.00x ratio falls materially.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
0.00x
Fee APR Sustainability
92% from trading fees(sustainable)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#3 of 5 KET-SOL pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#1380 of 4333 on meteora-dlmm

by AI Farmer Score

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the KET-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing KET and SOL into the pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive part of the trading fees. Your holdings can become mostly KET or mostly SOL after a large price move, and the fee income may not offset that change in value.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

The displayed yield decomposes into 15.9% fee APR and 1.3% reward APR. 92% of yield comes from trading fees, so the current return depends on continued swap volume rather than a stated reward schedule. Because the reward component is currently zero, emission decay is not the present source of APR compression; fee income can still fall if volume or fee capture declines.

shieldRisk Assessment

A recent seven-day impermanent-loss measurement is unavailable, and seven-day tick-in-range history is also unavailable, so realized loss and range efficiency cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, KET-SOL carries substantial token-specific volatility and asymmetric repricing risk; concentrated liquidity can stop earning fees when the pair moves outside the active range. Emission decay and exit timing matter for memecoin pools, but this pool currently shows no reward component, making fee-volume deterioration the more immediate assessment risk.

tollKET Context

KET is the memecoin side of this pair, so its price movement relative to SOL determines both the inventory mix and whether concentrated liquidity remains active. Liquidity depth for KET elsewhere is not established by the supplied pool metrics; sharp KET moves can create impermanent loss, move the position out of range, or leave the LP holding more of the depreciating asset.

tollSOL Context

SOL is the base asset paired against KET and provides the reference price for the pool's relative movement. SOL has broader ecosystem liquidity than a typical memecoin, but that does not remove pair-specific risk: a strong SOL move can shift the position out of range, while KET weakness can concentrate the LP in KET.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing KET and SOL into the pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive part of the trading fees. Your holdings can become mostly KET or mostly SOL after a large price move, and the fee income may not offset that change in value.

token

Token Details

KE
KETSolana
Explorer

KET is one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

SOL
SOLWrapped SOLSolana

Solana is a high-performance blockchain supporting builders around the world creating crypto apps that scale today.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
J8FbNWdrpXo1ECMEhpsJdQyJ4TcXYtDUYfyAStAJR9Fh
Protocol
Meteora DLMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
—
Pool Type
AMM
Token A
KET (9Pfync3e…)
Token B
SOL (So111111…)
Created
7/18/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

The current KET-SOL breakdown is 15.9% from fees and 1.3% from rewards, so the displayed 17.2% is presently fee-driven. If future incentives are introduced and later decay, only the reward component would decline directly; fee APR would still depend on trading volume.

The current KET-SOL breakdown is 15.9% from fees and 1.3% from rewards, so the displayed 17.2% is presently fee-driven. If future incentives are introduced and later decay, only the reward component would decline directly; fee APR would still depend on trading volume.

The current reward component is 1.3%, so there is no displayed reward stream to remove at present. If incentives are added later, their expiry would reduce total APR toward the fee component, 15.9%, unless trading activity changes.

The current reward component is 1.3%, so there is no displayed reward stream to remove at present. If incentives are added later, their expiry would reduce total APR toward the fee component, 15.9%, unless trading activity changes.

Risk is high relative to a stable or major-token pair because KET can move sharply against SOL and may have limited liquidity outside this pool. The pool's fee-only return, 15.9%, is compensation for that exposure, not protection against impermanent loss or KET price decline.

Risk is high relative to a stable or major-token pair because KET can move sharply against SOL and may have limited liquidity outside this pool. The pool's fee-only return, 15.9%, is compensation for that exposure, not protection against impermanent loss or KET price decline.

For KET-SOL, consider exiting when volume and fee generation deteriorate, when price approaches or leaves your active tick range, or when KET's market structure weakens. A TVL drain or collapse in the 0.00x activity ratio would also challenge the case for remaining invested.

For KET-SOL, consider exiting when volume and fee generation deteriorate, when price approaches or leaves your active tick range, or when KET's market structure weakens. A TVL drain or collapse in the 0.00x activity ratio would also challenge the case for remaining invested.

A precise break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss and range-history data are unavailable. The relevant comparison is cumulative fee income, represented by 15.9%, against the position's actual loss from KET-SOL price divergence; the displayed 17.2% should not be treated as a guaranteed payback period.

A precise break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss and range-history data are unavailable. The relevant comparison is cumulative fee income, represented by 15.9%, against the position's actual loss from KET-SOL price divergence; the displayed 17.2% should not be treated as a guaranteed payback period.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights