
SOL-LITon Raydium CLMMCLMM
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $40.61K
- APR
- 0.2% APR
- 24h Volume
- $58.02 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.25% fee
- Pool address
- SyMgvVrT…uGt4 · observed 2026-10-27
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT and the stated driver is ai_engine=hold. Its rank of #1023 of 8415 raydium-clmm pools places it above many listed pools but does not offset the shallow TVL or dependence on trading activity. The assessment would change if TVL drained, volume weakened materially, fee APR collapsed, or sustained activity and deeper liquidity reduced execution and exit risk.
Computed 2026-10-26 18:17 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$40.61K
Total value locked
$58.02
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.2%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -9.3%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a concentrated range centered on the current SOL-LIT price, monitor whether the position reaches either boundary, and rebalance when it does. Treat a sustained period in which volume no longer covers TVL as an exit trigger rather than waiting for the fee APR to normalize.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.2% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.2% | — | — |
| Volume | $58.02 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.15 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 2 SOL-LIT pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1873 of 19676 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 15% of all Solana pools
overall rank #21400 of 150817
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-LIT liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and LIT into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but you can end up with more of the falling token and less of the rising one, and the pool's small size can make exiting harder.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed yield decomposes into a fee-only APR of 0.2% and a reward-only APR of 0.0%. Fee sustainability is 100%, so current returns depend on traders continuing to use the pool rather than on emissions. Reward duration is not established, and the current reward component does not contribute to the displayed APR.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss data and tick-range utilization are not available, so realized loss and range efficiency cannot be quantified from the supplied record. This is a MEMECOIN pool: price gaps, liquidity withdrawals, and declining attention can reduce fee income while increasing inventory divergence. Emission decay is not currently the main risk because rewards contribute nothing to the displayed APR, but exit timing still matters if volume falls or the pair moves outside the active range.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established, more liquid asset in this pair and serves as the network-native side of the pool. Its broader market liquidity can make SOL easier to rebalance elsewhere, but a sharp SOL move against LIT changes the pool's inventory mix and can create impermanent loss for the LP.
tollLIT Context
LIT is the thinner-liquidity, memecoin side of the pair, so its price can be more sensitive to short-lived demand and market exits. A rapid LIT decline or a widening SOL-LIT price relationship can leave the LP holding more LIT while fee income may not compensate for the inventory change.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and LIT into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but you can end up with more of the falling token and less of the rising one, and the pool's small size can make exiting harder.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- SyMgvVrTUDkAUSM34oToC1cYF3zbNNAbzrLL3ifuGt4
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- LIT (EicWvteV…)
- Created
- 9/7/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, while the fee-only APR is 0.2% and fee sustainability is 100%. Emission decay therefore has little immediate effect on the displayed yield, but any future rewards would be temporary and should not be treated as a permanent APR source.
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, while the fee-only APR is 0.2% and fee sustainability is 100%. Emission decay therefore has little immediate effect on the displayed yield, but any future rewards would be temporary and should not be treated as a permanent APR source.
The current reward component is already represented by 0.0%, so expiration would leave the pool dependent on trading fees. With fee-only APR at 0.2% and volume-to-TVL at 0.00x, returns would fall if trading activity also declines.
The current reward component is already represented by 0.0%, so expiration would leave the pool dependent on trading fees. With fee-only APR at 0.2% and volume-to-TVL at 0.00x, returns would fall if trading activity also declines.
Risk is elevated because LIT can move sharply against SOL, while the pool has TVL of $41K and depends on fee-generating volume. The absence of recent loss and tick-range observations makes the realized impermanent-loss and active-range risk difficult to quantify.
Risk is elevated because LIT can move sharply against SOL, while the pool has TVL of $41K and depends on fee-generating volume. The absence of recent loss and tick-range observations makes the realized impermanent-loss and active-range risk difficult to quantify.
For SOL-LIT, consider exiting when volume no longer covers TVL for a sustained period, when the position repeatedly leaves its active range, or when LIT liquidity deteriorates. A falling fee-only APR from 0.2% would reinforce those signals.
For SOL-LIT, consider exiting when volume no longer covers TVL for a sustained period, when the position repeatedly leaves its active range, or when LIT liquidity deteriorates. A falling fee-only APR from 0.2% would reinforce those signals.
There is no reliable break-even estimate without recent impermanent-loss observations and a forecast for future fees. At present, the relevant offset is fee-only APR of 0.2% generated from volume-to-TVL of 0.00x, which can change quickly in a memecoin pool.
There is no reliable break-even estimate without recent impermanent-loss observations and a forecast for future fees. At present, the relevant offset is fee-only APR of 0.2% generated from volume-to-TVL of 0.00x, which can change quickly in a memecoin pool.




