new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, Exit at 80/100, and a live verdict of EXIT driven by ai_engine=hold. Ranked #350 of 3343 meteora-dlmm pools, this places the pool in a middle tier rather than indicating a strong entry signal: current volume provides some fee utility, but the low APR and limited risk-history coverage constrain conviction. A material TVL drain, weaker volume, or collapse in fee income would change the assessment toward exit, while sustained volume with stable or growing TVL could improve it.
Computed 2026-10-26 12:16 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$67.35K
Total value locked
$1.97K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 0.1%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a narrow range around the current JUPSOL-SOL price, monitor whether the position remains in range, and rebalance or exit if it stays out of range for 24 hours or if pool liquidity falls below your predefined minimum.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $1.97K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.18 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 JupSOL-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1024 of 4400 on meteora-dlmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 6% of all Solana pools
overall rank #8506 of 148664
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the JupSOL-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing JUPSOL and SOL into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but price changes can leave you holding more of the asset that has performed worse, and the current return is modest because rewards contribute nothing.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The return breaks down into 0.0% fee APR and 0.0% reward APR. 100% of yield comes from trading fees, while rewards currently add no measured return; no reliable rewards-duration estimate is available. For the MEMECOIN pool family, any future emissions should be treated as potentially decaying rather than as a permanent component of the APR.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading and tick-in-range history are not available for this pool, so recent price divergence and range efficiency cannot be quantified from the supplied data. The MEMECOIN classification adds liquidity and exit-timing risk: emission decay, declining attention, or a reduction in swap flow can lower fee income and make exiting a concentrated position more costly. With current returns driven by fees rather than rewards, weaker volume would directly weaken the LP case.
tollJupSOL Context
JUPSOL is a liquid-staking representation of SOL and serves as one side of this pool, giving the position exposure to the relative price between JUPSOL and SOL rather than only to SOL's dollar price. Liquidity depth for JUPSOL outside this pool is not established by the supplied metrics, so a JUPSOL-specific imbalance could widen execution costs. If JUPSOL trades away from its expected relationship with SOL, the LP can accumulate the weaker-performing asset through rebalancing.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset on the other side of the pair and is the main reference for valuing JUPSOL's exchange rate. SOL price movement affects the dollar value of both deposited assets, while divergence between SOL and JUPSOL creates the pair-specific inventory risk. Broader SOL liquidity may help execution, but it does not remove the risk of adverse JUPSOL-SOL price divergence inside this pool.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing JUPSOL and SOL into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but price changes can leave you holding more of the asset that has performed worse, and the current return is modest because rewards contribute nothing.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- bNcdL9Hy85c9qb4hRavAUFtJUiyRPh3u96jerFqZQq6
- Protocol
- Meteora DLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- JupSOL (jupSoLaH…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
1%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current APR is 0.0%, composed of 0.0% from fees and 0.0% from rewards, with 100% of yield coming from trading fees. Because reward contribution is currently zero, future emission decay would have little immediate effect unless incentives are restarted, but it would reduce any later reward component.
The current APR is 0.0%, composed of 0.0% from fees and 0.0% from rewards, with 100% of yield coming from trading fees. Because reward contribution is currently zero, future emission decay would have little immediate effect unless incentives are restarted, but it would reduce any later reward component.
At the current snapshot, rewards contribute 0.0%, so expiration would not remove a measured source of return. LP income would remain dependent on trading fees, currently represented by 0.0%, and would decline if volume weakened.
At the current snapshot, rewards contribute 0.0%, so expiration would not remove a measured source of return. LP income would remain dependent on trading fees, currently represented by 0.0%, and would decline if volume weakened.
The MEMECOIN classification signals higher liquidity, attention, and exit-timing uncertainty than a more established pool category. This pool has $67K of liquidity, $2K of daily volume, and 0.0% APR, while recent impermanent-loss and range-history data are unavailable for quantifying the price risk.
The MEMECOIN classification signals higher liquidity, attention, and exit-timing uncertainty than a more established pool category. This pool has $67K of liquidity, $2K of daily volume, and 0.0% APR, while recent impermanent-loss and range-history data are unavailable for quantifying the price risk.
Consider exiting when the position remains out of range, pool liquidity falls below your minimum execution threshold, or fee volume no longer justifies the inventory and exit risk. For this pool, a sustained decline from $2K volume or a deterioration in the fee-driven 0.0% return would weaken the case for remaining invested.
Consider exiting when the position remains out of range, pool liquidity falls below your minimum execution threshold, or fee volume no longer justifies the inventory and exit risk. For this pool, a sustained decline from $2K volume or a deterioration in the fee-driven 0.0% return would weaken the case for remaining invested.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable. The comparison should be between the position's actual price divergence and accumulated fees, with the fee reference currently at 0.0% and total APR at 0.0%.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable. The comparison should be between the position's actual price divergence and accumulated fees, with the fee reference currently at 0.0% and total APR at 0.0%.
