Wealthville Score
Verdict HOLD · 60% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 64/100 places this pool at #37 of 1696 meteora-dlmm pools, but its component scores show a more cautious profile: Enter 62/100, Hold 67/100, and Exit 15/100, with the live verdict at HOLD. The ai_engine=hold driver is consistent with a pool that currently generates substantial fee-based activity but remains exposed to memecoin volatility and uncertain persistence. The assessment would worsen with a TVL drain, sustained volume contraction, or a collapse in fee APR, and would improve only if fee production remained strong while liquidity and price stability improved.
Computed 2026-09-11 04:57 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$907.02K
Total value locked
$2.84M
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up500.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 645.7%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Set a range around the current CATE/SOL price and monitor it at least daily; rebalance or exit when price leaves the range, when fee generation no longer justifies the resulting inventory imbalance, or when the observed volume-to-TVL ratio falls materially below 3.13x.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $2.84M | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $17.97K | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#3 of 12 CATE-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#109 of 3165 on meteora-dlmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #731 of 110016
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the CATE-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing CATE and SOL into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You earn part of the trading fees, but large CATE price moves can leave you holding more of the weaker asset and reduce the value of your position compared with simply holding both tokens.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated yield decomposes into 500.0% fee APR and 0.0% reward APR, with 100% of yield coming from trading fees. Rewards currently do not contribute to the quoted APR, so emission decay is not the immediate APR driver; future returns depend primarily on whether trading volume and fee generation persist. No reliable reward-duration estimate is established for this pool.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading is unavailable, so recent fee income cannot be compared with measured price divergence over that period. Tick-in-range history is also unavailable, leaving the pool's recent range efficiency unverified. As a MEMECOIN pool, CATE-SOL is exposed to abrupt CATE repricing, one-sided inventory accumulation, liquidity withdrawal, and rapid volume decay; exit timing matters because fee yield can fall faster than the token risk disappears.
tollCATE Context
CATE is the memecoin side of this pair, so CATE price movements determine whether the LP accumulates more CATE or more SOL as the market moves. The supplied data does not establish CATE's liquidity depth elsewhere; thin external liquidity would increase slippage and make a sharp CATE move harder to exit without price impact.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the quote-side asset and provides the higher-liquidity reference for valuing the position, although SOL's own market movement still changes the pair price. SOL liquidity elsewhere is not quantified here; a CATE rally or decline against SOL changes the LP's inventory mix and can create impermanent loss even when SOL is broadly stable against other assets.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing CATE and SOL into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You earn part of the trading fees, but large CATE price moves can leave you holding more of the weaker asset and reduce the value of your position compared with simply holding both tokens.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- qhJ7kLjrE68sbDF11CpwMt3P9rqiwZtretM5ZzeAX6o
- Protocol
- Meteora DLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- CATE (Ai66LHZG…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 7/27/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
5%
APR
0%
APR
3%
APR
5%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Emission decay is not currently reducing the quoted reward component because 0.0% is the reward-only APR. The stated total APR of 500.0% is instead supported by 500.0% in fees and 100% fee sustainability, so declining volume would be the more immediate APR risk.
Emission decay is not currently reducing the quoted reward component because 0.0% is the reward-only APR. The stated total APR of 500.0% is instead supported by 500.0% in fees and 100% fee sustainability, so declining volume would be the more immediate APR risk.
There is no current reward contribution in the quoted APR, so an incentive expiry would not remove a listed reward component from 500.0%. Future LP income would remain dependent on 500.0% and on whether trading activity continues to support 100%.
There is no current reward contribution in the quoted APR, so an incentive expiry would not remove a listed reward component from 500.0%. Future LP income would remain dependent on 500.0% and on whether trading activity continues to support 100%.
Risk is high relative to a stable-asset pool because CATE can move sharply against SOL, creating impermanent loss and an imbalanced inventory. The pool has $907K of liquidity and 3.13x volume-to-TVL, but high activity does not remove memecoin drawdown or exit-liquidity risk.
Risk is high relative to a stable-asset pool because CATE can move sharply against SOL, creating impermanent loss and an imbalanced inventory. The pool has $907K of liquidity and 3.13x volume-to-TVL, but high activity does not remove memecoin drawdown or exit-liquidity risk.
Use a combination of price and fee signals: exit or rebalance when CATE/SOL leaves your chosen range, when $2.8M and the 3.13x ratio deteriorate materially, or when fee income no longer compensates for holding an increasingly one-sided CATE/SOL inventory. Do not wait for incentives to provide an exit signal, since rewards are not currently contributing to APR.
Use a combination of price and fee signals: exit or rebalance when CATE/SOL leaves your chosen range, when $2.8M and the 3.13x ratio deteriorate materially, or when fee income no longer compensates for holding an increasingly one-sided CATE/SOL inventory. Do not wait for incentives to provide an exit signal, since rewards are not currently contributing to APR.
It cannot be estimated reliably without a seven-day IL reading, a longer price path, and evidence that 500.0% persists. As a simplified annualized estimate, fee break-even is the impermanent-loss fraction divided by 500.0%, but that calculation ignores changing volume, range exposure, compounding, and further CATE price movement.
It cannot be estimated reliably without a seven-day IL reading, a longer price path, and evidence that 500.0% persists. As a simplified annualized estimate, fee break-even is the impermanent-loss fraction divided by 500.0%, but that calculation ignores changing volume, range exposure, compounding, and further CATE price movement.
