SOL-MONon Orca WhirlpoolWhirlpoolHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $88.19K
- APR
- 69.0% APR
- 24h Volume
- $11.42K 24h vol
- Pool address
- 14K3BM1F…28un · observed 2026-10-24
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 48/100 gives SOL-MON a middle-of-the-scale assessment, with Enter 42/100, Hold 55/100, and Exit 26/100; the live verdict is HOLD and the stated driver is ai_engine=hold. Its rank of #1922 of 4356 orca-whirlpool pools places it away from the strongest-ranked group, while the fee-only structure provides a clearer return source than an unquantified emissions program. The assessment would weaken if TVL drains, volume falls, or fee APR collapses, and it could improve only if sustained trading activity raises fee income without a corresponding increase in range or MON price risk.
Computed 2026-10-24 08:09 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$88.19K
Total value locked
$11.42K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up69.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 52.3%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a concentrated range around the current SOL/MON price only if you can monitor it, and rebalance when the price leaves that range or when volume falls enough that fee income no longer compensates for MON exposure. Exit rather than widen indefinitely if MON liquidity deteriorates and the position becomes predominantly MON.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 69.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 52.5% | — | — |
| Volume | $11.42K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $116.22 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 9 SOL-MON pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1322 of 20205 on orca-whirlpool
by AI Farmer Score
Top 5% of all Solana pools
overall rank #6817 of 148664
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-MON liquidity pool on Orca Whirlpool. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and MON into a shared trading pool and receiving a portion of trading fees. Your holdings change as traders buy one token and sell the other, so you can end up with more of the weaker-performing token and lose money even when fees are earned.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield decomposes into 52.5% fee APR and 16.5% reward APR, with 76% of yield coming from trading fees. Current returns therefore do not depend on a live reward stream, but fee income can fall quickly if SOL-MON volume declines or liquidity leaves the pool. Reward duration and emission timing are not established, so future incentives should not be treated as a reliable component of returns.
shieldRisk Assessment
The pool's 7-day impermanent-loss reading is unavailable, as is its 7-day tick-in-range history, so recent price divergence and range efficiency cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, MON can experience sharp repricing, thin exit liquidity, and a rapid fall in fee generation; emission decay or incentive changes could further affect exit timing if rewards are introduced. LPs should assess whether fee income remains sufficient before continuing to hold exposure.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established network asset in this pair and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than MON. If SOL appreciates materially against MON, the AMM mechanism generally leaves the LP with more MON and less SOL, creating opportunity cost versus holding SOL directly. SOL volatility also determines how often the position may move outside a concentrated range.
tollMON Context
MON is the memecoin side of the pair, so its liquidity and price discovery are likely more dependent on this pool and a smaller set of venues than SOL. A sharp MON decline can leave the LP holding more MON while fee income may contract as traders and liquidity providers exit. A MON rally can produce the opposite inventory shift and still create divergence loss relative to holding both assets separately.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and MON into a shared trading pool and receiving a portion of trading fees. Your holdings change as traders buy one token and sell the other, so you can end up with more of the weaker-performing token and lose money even when fees are earned.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 14K3BM1FA6gn4F9X1h5E9uriMZZY2xyz3fQ72bL628un
- Protocol
- Orca Whirlpool
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Whirlpool (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- MON (CrAr4RRJ…)
- Created
- 6/24/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
61%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll orca-whirlpool poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 16.5%, so the stated 69.0% APR is currently fee-driven rather than emission-driven. If incentives are added later, emission decay could reduce the reward component while 52.5% would still depend on trading volume.
The current reward-only APR is 16.5%, so the stated 69.0% APR is currently fee-driven rather than emission-driven. If incentives are added later, emission decay could reduce the reward component while 52.5% would still depend on trading volume.
The reward component would fall toward zero when incentives expire, but this pool already reports 16.5% reward APR and 76% fee-funded yield. After any incentive change, the position would depend primarily on whether trading fees remain sufficient for the MON and range risks.
The reward component would fall toward zero when incentives expire, but this pool already reports 16.5% reward APR and 76% fee-funded yield. After any incentive change, the position would depend primarily on whether trading fees remain sufficient for the MON and range risks.
Risk is elevated because MON can move sharply and may have less exit liquidity than SOL. The available 7-day impermanent-loss and tick-range history cannot quantify recent exposure, so 69.0% should not be treated as a guaranteed return.
Risk is elevated because MON can move sharply and may have less exit liquidity than SOL. The available 7-day impermanent-loss and tick-range history cannot quantify recent exposure, so 69.0% should not be treated as a guaranteed return.
For SOL-MON, consider exiting when the position leaves its intended price range, MON liquidity deteriorates, or fee income no longer compensates for holding additional MON. A sustained decline in $11K or 0.13x is a concrete warning that the fee case is weakening.
For SOL-MON, consider exiting when the position leaves its intended price range, MON liquidity deteriorates, or fee income no longer compensates for holding additional MON. A sustained decline in $11K or 0.13x is a concrete warning that the fee case is weakening.
There is no defensible fixed break-even time because the pool lacks a usable 7-day impermanent-loss history and future volume is uncertain. Break-even occurs only when cumulative fees, currently represented by 52.5%, exceed divergence losses and any costs from rebalancing or exiting.
There is no defensible fixed break-even time because the pool lacks a usable 7-day impermanent-loss history and future volume is uncertain. Break-even occurs only when cumulative fees, currently represented by 52.5%, exceed divergence losses and any costs from rebalancing or exiting.
