new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 places this pool below its Enter threshold of 15/100 and Hold threshold of 20/100, while its Exit threshold is 80/100. That aligns with the live verdict EXIT: the scanner is CRITICAL, the strong EXIT signal is unopposed, and the AI engine's hold assessment does not outweigh the scanner result. The #1710-of-24532 rank among raydium-amm pools indicates a relatively weak position in the tracked set. The assessment would improve only with sustained volume, stable or rising TVL, credible reward support, and a less severe scanner result; a TVL drain or further yield collapse would strengthen the exit case.
Computed 2026-11-12 17:19 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$51.76K
Total value locked
$86.11
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.2%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 0.3%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a predefined exit rule: withdraw if the scanner remains CRITICAL while 0.00x stays near its current level, or if pool liquidity begins draining; do not widen a range to compensate for missing activity without first confirming sustained volume.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.2% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.2% | — | — |
| Volume | $86.11 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.22 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 COK-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#13084 of 99294 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 13% of all Solana pools
overall rank #18982 of 157883
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the COK-SOL liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing COK and SOL into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a small share of trading fees, but price changes can leave you with more of the weaker asset and a lower value than simply holding both.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Total APR of 0.2% decomposes into fee-only APR of 0.2% and reward-only APR of 0.0%. 100% of yield comes from trading fees, so there is no current reward component cushioning weak activity. The reward schedule and remaining duration are not established, making future emission support impossible to model.
shieldRisk Assessment
A reliable seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-range history are not established, so recent price divergence and range efficiency cannot be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, COK-SOL carries substantial token-price and liquidity-exit risk; emission decay can remove any future subsidy quickly, while low trading activity can leave fees insufficient to offset losses. Exit timing matters because a falling token price, shrinking liquidity, or reduced market interest can make withdrawal more costly.
tollCOK Context
COK is the memecoin side of this pair and is the main source of idiosyncratic price and liquidity risk for the LP. Its depth outside this pool is not established here; a sharp COK move against SOL changes the deposited asset mix and can leave the LP holding proportionally more of the underperforming token.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the comparatively established settlement asset in the pair, but SOL price movements still affect the dollar value of both the position and any impermanent loss relative to holding the assets separately. If COK weakens against SOL, the pool rebalances toward COK; if SOL weakens, the opposite effect occurs, with fee income depending on actual swap flow.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing COK and SOL into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a small share of trading fees, but price changes can leave you with more of the weaker asset and a lower value than simply holding both.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 1D5GHSzrcaSXLtUYxSCg4vWHdKGd7hFnasYPiPFYFGX
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- COK (Dnb9dLSX…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
21%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so present returns are not supported by emissions. If incentives are introduced and then decay, Total APR of 0.2% would depend increasingly on fee-only APR of 0.2%, which is tied to trading activity.
Current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so present returns are not supported by emissions. If incentives are introduced and then decay, Total APR of 0.2% would depend increasingly on fee-only APR of 0.2%, which is tied to trading activity.
There is no current reward component in the reported APR, so expiration would not remove an existing reward stream but would eliminate any future subsidy. The remaining return would be fee-only APR of 0.2%, supported by the pool's trading volume rather than emissions.
There is no current reward component in the reported APR, so expiration would not remove an existing reward stream but would eliminate any future subsidy. The remaining return would be fee-only APR of 0.2%, supported by the pool's trading volume rather than emissions.
Risk is high because COK can move sharply, its external liquidity depth is not established here, and a thin market can make exits difficult. Total APR of 0.2% and fee sustainability of 100% do not remove the risk that price losses exceed fee income.
Risk is high because COK can move sharply, its external liquidity depth is not established here, and a thin market can make exits difficult. Total APR of 0.2% and fee sustainability of 100% do not remove the risk that price losses exceed fee income.
For this pool, an exit rule should be tied to persistent scanner severity, falling TVL, or continued weak turnover rather than APR alone. The current live verdict is EXIT, with a score of 17/100 against an Exit threshold of 80/100, so a sustained CRITICAL scanner result is a concrete exit signal.
For this pool, an exit rule should be tied to persistent scanner severity, falling TVL, or continued weak turnover rather than APR alone. The current live verdict is EXIT, with a score of 17/100 against an Exit threshold of 80/100, so a sustained CRITICAL scanner result is a concrete exit signal.
A defensible break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and the price path are not established. Fee-only APR of 0.2% is the relevant offset, but its ability to recover losses depends on sustained volume and whether COK and SOL later converge in price performance.
A defensible break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and the price path are not established. Fee-only APR of 0.2% is the relevant offset, but its ability to recover losses depends on sustained volume and whether COK and SOL later converge in price performance.
