new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The 14/100 Wealthville Score, with Enter 15/100, Hold 13/100, and Exit 89/100, supports the live EXIT verdict rather than a fresh-entry recommendation based solely on APR. The ai_engine=hold driver is consistent with a fee-funded pool that has meaningful turnover relative to liquidity but limited depth and memecoin-specific price risk. Its #2045 of 18146 ranking among raydium-amm pools places it in a lower-ranked segment, so the assessment would worsen with a TVL drain, volume contraction, or fee-yield collapse, and improve only if liquidity deepens while fee volume remains persistent without a corresponding increase in price divergence.
Computed 2026-10-22 23:58 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$1.81K
Total value locked
$21.37
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up2.4%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -1.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a position size that can tolerate shallow liquidity, and reassess or exit if 0.01x falls materially from its current reading, $2K begins draining, or PHAT and GP establish a sustained one-sided price trend; do not wait for the fee APR to update after volume has already contracted.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 2.4% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 2.3% | — | — |
| Volume | $21.37 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.05 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 PHAT-GP pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1339 of 91854 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #2682 of 148664
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the PHAT-GP liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing PHAT and GP into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. If one token changes price sharply, your position can end up holding more of the weaker token, and the fees may not fully cover that difference.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 2.3% fee APR and 0.0% reward APR. 99% of reported yield comes from trading fees, which means the current return depends on continued swap volume rather than scheduled farm emissions. Reward dependency is not established, so fee income should be treated as the primary operating assumption.
shieldRisk Assessment
A reliable recent impermanent-loss reading and tick-in-range reading are not available for this pool, so recent loss experience and range utilization cannot be quantified from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, PHAT-GP is exposed to sharp PHAT or GP repricing, thin liquidity, and adverse selection when traders move against LP inventory. Emission decay is not the main current risk because the reward component is 0.0%; the more immediate risk is a drop in trading volume or a rapid exit before fees offset inventory divergence.
tollPHAT Context
PHAT is one side of this pool and determines part of the inventory an LP holds as its price moves against GP. The pool's $2K depth is limited, while PHAT's liquidity depth elsewhere is not established here; a sharp PHAT move can therefore change the LP's token mix faster than fee income compensates. PHAT price appreciation or depreciation does not create a simple gain for the LP because the AMM rebalances inventory toward the relatively weaker asset.
tollGP Context
GP is the other side of the pair and carries the same inventory and repricing risk within PHAT-GP. Its liquidity depth elsewhere is not established here, so GP price moves should be assessed against this pool's $2K and 0.01x turnover rather than assumed external liquidity. A rapid GP move can increase divergence loss even while generating fees if trading is one-sided.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing PHAT and GP into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. If one token changes price sharply, your position can end up holding more of the weaker token, and the fees may not fully cover that difference.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 259dyTrR1KgguVwekv71ehmKfSfkC5fDPfBaxMmr3Fsx
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- PHAT (2pWXsELt…)
- Token B
- GP (HTmQz7My…)
- Created
- 9/18/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
9%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
5%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 0.0%, while fee APR is 2.3% and total APR is 2.4%. Because the reported yield is fee-funded, emission decay is not currently the main APR driver, but any future reward program could decline over time.
The current reward component is 0.0%, while fee APR is 2.3% and total APR is 2.4%. Because the reported yield is fee-funded, emission decay is not currently the main APR driver, but any future reward program could decline over time.
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so expiration of farm incentives would not remove the reported source of yield at present. LP returns would still depend on trading fees, currently represented by 2.3%, and those fees would fall if $21 volume contracts.
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so expiration of farm incentives would not remove the reported source of yield at present. LP returns would still depend on trading fees, currently represented by 2.3%, and those fees would fall if $21 volume contracts.
Risk is elevated by the MEMECOIN pool family, limited depth at $2K, and dependence on trading fees for 2.4% total APR. Recent impermanent-loss and range-utilization readings are unavailable, so the extent of recent inventory divergence cannot be quantified.
Risk is elevated by the MEMECOIN pool family, limited depth at $2K, and dependence on trading fees for 2.4% total APR. Recent impermanent-loss and range-utilization readings are unavailable, so the extent of recent inventory divergence cannot be quantified.
For PHAT-GP, reassess when 0.01x turnover weakens, $2K declines, or PHAT and GP move persistently in one direction. Exiting before fee generation collapses can be preferable to holding for a headline 2.4% that is no longer supported by trading activity.
For PHAT-GP, reassess when 0.01x turnover weakens, $2K declines, or PHAT and GP move persistently in one direction. Exiting before fee generation collapses can be preferable to holding for a headline 2.4% that is no longer supported by trading activity.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss data is unavailable and future fees depend on $21 volume. The relevant comparison is whether ongoing 2.3% fee income continues long enough to offset the inventory loss created by PHAT or GP price divergence.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss data is unavailable and future fees depend on $21 volume. The relevant comparison is whether ongoing 2.3% fee income continues long enough to offset the inventory loss created by PHAT or GP price divergence.
