new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100. The live verdict is EXIT, driven by ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #475 of 8541 raydium-amm pools. In practical terms, the score supports monitoring an existing position more than initiating a new one: fee-funded yield is present, but liquidity and activity remain important constraints. The assessment would change if TVL drained, trading volume weakened enough to reduce fee income, or the displayed APR collapsed; stronger sustained volume and deeper liquidity would support a more favorable entry view.
Computed 2026-09-17 23:20 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$59.70K
Total value locked
$36.70
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -37.9%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a range you can monitor actively, and set an exit trigger for a material TVL decline from $60K or a sustained deterioration in 0.00x; do not wait for emissions to compensate for falling swap activity.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.1% | — | — |
| Volume | $36.70 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.09 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-ZODs pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1 of 69219 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1 of 118991
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-ZODs liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and ZODS into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a portion of swap fees, but your holdings can become more concentrated in the weaker-performing token and may be worth less than simply holding both assets.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed APR decomposes into 0.1% from swap fees and 0.0% from rewards. 100% of yield is trading-fee funded, so returns depend directly on continued volume and liquidity usage rather than a reward program. Reward dependency is not established, and the zero reward component provides no current emissions cushion if fee activity weakens.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss and tick-in-range readings are unavailable, so this pool does not provide a quantified recent record for either exposure. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-ZODS remains exposed to sharp ZODS price divergence, thin liquidity, and rapid liquidity withdrawal. Emission decay is not established, but any future incentives should be treated as potentially temporary; exit timing matters because waiting for a fee recovery may leave an LP exposed to a weakening token or shrinking pool.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established network asset in this pair and generally has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana than ZODS. SOL price moves change the pair's balance and can create impermanent loss when SOL appreciates or falls sharply relative to ZODS, while its broader liquidity can make the SOL leg easier to hedge.
tollZODs Context
ZODS is the memecoin leg and should be treated as the less liquid, higher-volatility asset unless external venues show otherwise. A rapid ZODS repricing can move the position out of its active range, increase inventory imbalance, and make withdrawal or hedging more difficult than for SOL.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and ZODS into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a portion of swap fees, but your holdings can become more concentrated in the weaker-performing token and may be worth less than simply holding both assets.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 28Sy2Edvvc5TKEXXSsgBHcPQFM9AMz6c2XuUQ8V3TuEF
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- ZODs (J1ow1c3E…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
194%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
8%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 0.0%, while fee income is 0.1% and total APR is 0.1%. Because current yield is fee-funded, future emission decay would matter mainly if rewards are introduced or revived; fee APR would still depend on trading volume.
The current reward component is 0.0%, while fee income is 0.1% and total APR is 0.1%. Because current yield is fee-funded, future emission decay would matter mainly if rewards are introduced or revived; fee APR would still depend on trading volume.
There is currently no displayed reward contribution beyond 0.0%, and 100% of yield comes from fees. If incentives expire or remain absent, the pool's return is determined by 0.1% and can fall if trading activity does not support that fee rate.
There is currently no displayed reward contribution beyond 0.0%, and 100% of yield comes from fees. If incentives expire or remain absent, the pool's return is determined by 0.1% and can fall if trading activity does not support that fee rate.
Risk is materially higher than in a deep, correlated-asset pool because ZODS can move sharply against SOL and liquidity can leave quickly. With TVL at $60K and activity at 0.00x relative to liquidity, both price divergence and limited fee generation should be considered.
Risk is materially higher than in a deep, correlated-asset pool because ZODS can move sharply against SOL and liquidity can leave quickly. With TVL at $60K and activity at 0.00x relative to liquidity, both price divergence and limited fee generation should be considered.
Use a predefined trigger rather than waiting for a reward schedule: exit or reduce exposure if TVL falls materially below $60K, volume weakens from its current 0.00x, or ZODS enters a sustained one-way move against SOL. A worsening fee rate from 0.1% is another direct signal because rewards are not currently supporting the position.
Use a predefined trigger rather than waiting for a reward schedule: exit or reduce exposure if TVL falls materially below $60K, volume weakens from its current 0.00x, or ZODS enters a sustained one-way move against SOL. A worsening fee rate from 0.1% is another direct signal because rewards are not currently supporting the position.
A precise break-even time cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable. At 0.1% fee APR, recovery depends on stable future volume, unchanged token prices, and continued liquidity; a large or persistent SOL-ZODS divergence may take substantially longer to offset than the fee rate implies.
A precise break-even time cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable. At 0.1% fee APR, recovery depends on stable future volume, unchanged token prices, and continued liquidity; a large or persistent SOL-ZODS divergence may take substantially longer to offset than the fee rate implies.
