new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A Wealthville Score of 46/100 with Enter 39/100, Hold 54/100, and Exit 26/100 supports the live verdict HOLD, driven by ai_engine=hold rather than a clear high-conviction entry signal. The pool ranks #1263 of 8541 raydium-amm pools, placing it above many listed pools but not establishing it as a leading option; its 0.02x activity level and fee-only yield limit the case for allocation. The assessment would improve with sustained volume and deeper TVL, and would worsen with a TVL drain, fee-yield collapse, or evidence that SHARBI liquidity is becoming difficult to exit.
Computed 2026-09-02 07:04 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$40.32K
Total value locked
$714.48
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up1.4%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 0.9%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a wide initial price range because tick-in-range history is unavailable, and set a precommitted exit trigger for a material TVL drain or a sustained fall in fee activity rather than waiting for emissions that are not currently contributing to APR.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 1.4% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 1.4% | — | — |
| Volume | $714.48 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $1.79 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SHARBI-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#5327 of 60178 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 10% of all Solana pools
overall rank #9747 of 105013
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SHARBI-SOL liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SHARBI and SOL into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a portion of trading fees. Your holdings can shift toward the token that falls in relative price, and the small pool size can make leaving harder during a sharp move.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield decomposes into 1.4% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 99% means the stated APR is supported by swap activity rather than emissions. Reward dependency and any future emission schedule are not established, so the fee component is the more relevant basis for evaluating ongoing returns.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss and tick-range readings are unavailable, so this pool does not provide a measured historical basis for estimating price-divergence loss or range utilization. As a MEMECOIN pool, SHARBI-SOL is exposed to abrupt SHARBI price moves, thin liquidity, and adverse selection during volatile swaps. Emission decay cannot be assessed from a defined schedule, and exit timing matters because liquidity can leave before a position recovers trading losses.
tollSHARBI Context
SHARBI is the memecoin side of this pair, so its price movement relative to SOL determines much of the LP's inventory shift and impermanent-loss exposure. Its liquidity depth elsewhere is not established by the supplied pool metrics; a sharp SHARBI repricing or reduced market depth can make exiting this pool materially worse than the fee income suggests.
tollSOL Context
SOL provides the liquid base asset against which SHARBI is priced in this pool. SOL price strength or weakness changes the pair's relative-price path, while SOL's broader market liquidity may make the SOL leg easier to value and exit than the SHARBI leg.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SHARBI and SOL into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a portion of trading fees. Your holdings can shift toward the token that falls in relative price, and the small pool size can make leaving harder during a sharp move.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 28cvXZq2Cwu7ZHuSAuNkHhZN3SNMz9bHh62Qapp1J3xY
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SHARBI (8D1nUMJQ…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
4%
APR
176%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
There is no current reward contribution indicated: 0.0% of the stated 1.4% APR comes from rewards, while 1.4% comes from fees. Because the emission schedule is not established, future decay cannot be quantified; any reduction in incentives would leave fee activity as the main return source.
There is no current reward contribution indicated: 0.0% of the stated 1.4% APR comes from rewards, while 1.4% comes from fees. Because the emission schedule is not established, future decay cannot be quantified; any reduction in incentives would leave fee activity as the main return source.
The current reward component is 0.0%, so the pool is already dependent on trading fees rather than active farm emissions. If incentives are introduced and later expire, the remaining return would be the fee component, 1.4%, assuming trading volume does not change.
The current reward component is 0.0%, so the pool is already dependent on trading fees rather than active farm emissions. If incentives are introduced and later expire, the remaining return would be the fee component, 1.4%, assuming trading volume does not change.
Risk is elevated by SHARBI's memecoin price volatility, uncertain liquidity depth outside this pool, and the possibility of rapid TVL withdrawal. The pool's 0.02x activity level and unavailable recent impermanent-loss and range data do not establish that fee income will offset a sharp relative-price move.
Risk is elevated by SHARBI's memecoin price volatility, uncertain liquidity depth outside this pool, and the possibility of rapid TVL withdrawal. The pool's 0.02x activity level and unavailable recent impermanent-loss and range data do not establish that fee income will offset a sharp relative-price move.
Use a predefined exit rule based on a material TVL decline, weakening fee volume, or a SHARBI move that leaves the position concentrated in the weaker asset. In this pool, waiting for rewards is not a strong exit rationale because 0.0% is the current reward component.
Use a predefined exit rule based on a material TVL decline, weakening fee volume, or a SHARBI move that leaves the position concentrated in the weaker asset. In this pool, waiting for rewards is not a strong exit rationale because 0.0% is the current reward component.
There is no defensible fixed break-even period because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future volume is uncertain. At a constant 1.4% gross APR, recovery would still depend on the size and persistence of the SHARBI-SOL price divergence, plus whether fee volume remains sufficient.
There is no defensible fixed break-even period because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future volume is uncertain. At a constant 1.4% gross APR, recovery would still depend on the size and persistence of the SHARBI-SOL price divergence, plus whether fee volume remains sufficient.
