Liquidityhelp
lock$34.42K
Total value locked
$101.54
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.8%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -0.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a narrow range only if you can monitor it frequently, and set an exit trigger for persistently negligible swap activity or a material deterioration in QTO liquidity; this pool's low activity does not justify passive range placement.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.8% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.8% | — | — |
| Volume | $101.54 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.51 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 SOL-QTO pools
by AI Farmer Score
#8427 of 41916 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 17% of all Solana pools
overall rank #11988 of 76620
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-QTO liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and QTO into a shared trading pool and earning a portion of swap fees. The stated return is fee-based, but low trading activity means the position may earn little while QTO price changes can alter what you hold.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated yield consists of 0.8% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 100% of yield comes from fees, so the pool is not currently dependent on an emissions program for its stated return. Reward duration and remaining reward schedule are not established.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history and seven-day tick-range coverage are not reported, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be assessed from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-QTO carries token-specific volatility, liquidity, and exit-timing risk; emissions can decay or stop, making an exit decision more dependent on swap activity and the QTO market than on incentives.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the more liquid and widely traded side of this pair, with deeper liquidity across Solana venues. SOL price movements relative to QTO can shift the pool inventory toward one asset and create impermanent loss even when SOL remains liquid elsewhere.
tollQTO Context
QTO is the memecoin side of the pair and is likely to determine the pool's concentration and exit risk. A sharp QTO repricing or reduction in QTO-side liquidity can make rebalancing costly and can leave the LP holding more of the weaker asset.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and QTO into a shared trading pool and earning a portion of swap fees. The stated return is fee-based, but low trading activity means the position may earn little while QTO price changes can alter what you hold.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 2KUEBor9P8e2YVGCUnD9ipmhGM9nL4pG11zeEoQVQZWg
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- QTO (quantoL8…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
2%
APR
23%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 0.0%, while fee income is 0.8%. If emissions are introduced or later reduced, only the reward portion would change directly; the fee component depends on future trading volume.
The current reward component is 0.0%, while fee income is 0.8%. If emissions are introduced or later reduced, only the reward portion would change directly; the fee component depends on future trading volume.
The reward portion would fall away, leaving trading fees as the remaining yield source. Here, 100% of the stated yield already comes from fees, so incentive expiry would not change the fee mechanism but could reduce total APR if rewards are later added.
The reward portion would fall away, leaving trading fees as the remaining yield source. Here, 100% of the stated yield already comes from fees, so incentive expiry would not change the fee mechanism but could reduce total APR if rewards are later added.
Risk is driven by SOL-QTO price divergence, QTO liquidity, and the ability to exit without large slippage. This pool has $34K in liquidity and $102 in 24-hour volume, so its limited observed activity may make exits more sensitive to order size.
Risk is driven by SOL-QTO price divergence, QTO liquidity, and the ability to exit without large slippage. This pool has $34K in liquidity and $102 in 24-hour volume, so its limited observed activity may make exits more sensitive to order size.
Consider exiting when QTO liquidity or trading activity weakens further, when your selected range is no longer usable, or when the token thesis changes. For this pool, persistently low activity relative to $34K is a clearer exit signal than relying on rewards.
Consider exiting when QTO liquidity or trading activity weakens further, when your selected range is no longer usable, or when the token thesis changes. For this pool, persistently low activity relative to $34K is a clearer exit signal than relying on rewards.
There is no defensible break-even estimate because seven-day impermanent-loss history and range data are unavailable. Gross fee recovery should be evaluated against 0.8%, but that figure can change materially if the pool's trading volume changes.
There is no defensible break-even estimate because seven-day impermanent-loss history and range data are unavailable. Gross fee recovery should be evaluated against 0.8%, but that figure can change materially if the pool's trading volume changes.
