WealthVille
SOL
S
xing
x

SOL-xingon Raydium AMM

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $41.35K
APR
0.9% APR
24h Volume
$60.65 24h vol
Pool address
2PuVkhDE…37HV · observed 2026-11-11
5F · Poor

Wealthville Score

Verdict EXIT · 71% confidence

ai_engine=exitscanner=CRITICAL
How this score works →
Enter6

new capital

Hold3

keep position

Exit98

urgency to leave

The Wealthville Score of 5/100 combines an Enter score of 6/100, Hold score of 3/100, and Exit score of 98/100, producing a live verdict of EXIT. The ai_engine is exit and the scanner is CRITICAL, with multiple sources supporting the exit signal; the pool ranks #23430 of 24532 raydium-amm pools, placing it near the bottom of the tracked set. The assessment would improve only if sustained volume lifted fee generation, TVL became more stable, and market depth improved; a TVL drain, further yield compression, or weaker XING liquidity would reinforce it.

Computed 2026-11-09 16:23 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$41.35K

Total value locked

$60.65

24h volume

×0.0 turnover

Yieldhelp

trending_up

0.9%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

≈ 1.2%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 2502m ago
block

AI Verdict

Avoid

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

check_circleFee-driven yield: 100% of APR from trading fees
warningElevated risk score: 98/100
tips_and_updates

Use a narrow range only if you can monitor it frequently, and exit when volume remains weak while TVL drains or when the live verdict stays at EXIT; do not wait for fee yield to compensate for a worsening XING exit market.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

table_chart

Performance Breakdown

Metric24h / Day7d / Week30d / Month
Total APR0.9%——
Fee APR0.9%——
Volume$60.65——
Fees Earned$0.15——

Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
1.5%(trailing 7d fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−0.2%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
1.2%(after IL + repositioning)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
0.00x(protocol avg 2.2x)
Fee Yield per $1 TVL / Day
$0.0000
Fee APR Sustainability
100% from trading fees(sustainable)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#1 of 2 SOL-xing pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#13332 of 99294 on raydium-amm

by AI Farmer Score

leaderboard

Top 13% of all Solana pools

overall rank #19357 of 157883

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-xing liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and XING into a shared pool so other users can trade between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your holdings can shift toward the weaker token, and selling the position may be harder if XING activity or liquidity falls.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

SOL-XING decomposes into 0.9% fee APR and 0.0% reward APR. 100% of the displayed yield comes from trading fees, so the return depends on continued swap activity rather than emissions. Reward dependency and incentive duration are not established, making the fee component the more relevant basis for evaluating sustainability.

shieldRisk Assessment

Seven-day impermanent-loss reporting is unavailable, and seven-day tick-in-range history is also unavailable, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-XING carries emission-decay and attention-rotation risk: if incentives weaken or trading activity leaves, fee income can contract quickly, while exit timing may become difficult as XING liquidity thins.

tollSOL Context

SOL is the relatively established asset in this pair and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana venues than this pool. If SOL rises or falls materially against XING, the AMM automatically shifts the position toward the asset that underperforms, which can make the LP's outcome differ from simply holding SOL and XING.

tollxing Context

XING is the memecoin side of the pair, so its external liquidity, market depth, and price discovery are likely more limited than SOL's. A sharp XING move can increase inventory imbalance and make exits more dependent on available buyers, while a prolonged decline can leave the LP holding a larger share of XING.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and XING into a shared pool so other users can trade between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your holdings can shift toward the weaker token, and selling the position may be harder if XING activity or liquidity falls.

token

Token Details

SOL
SOLWrapped SOLSolana

Solana is a high-performance blockchain supporting builders around the world creating crypto apps that scale today.

xing
xingxing xingSolana
Explorer

xing xing (xing) — one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
2PuVkhDEQ5uprXRowUnGgFNvPFUN7PDomMgQWxYq37HV
Protocol
Raydium AMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
—
Pool Type
AMM
Token A
SOL (So111111…)
Token B
xing (5JcdnWEw…)
Created
5/22/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

Any decline in emissions would reduce the reward component represented by 0.0%. Because 100% of current yield comes from fees, the remaining APR would depend mainly on whether trading volume can support 0.9%.

Any decline in emissions would reduce the reward component represented by 0.0%. Because 100% of current yield comes from fees, the remaining APR would depend mainly on whether trading volume can support 0.9%.

The reward portion represented by 0.0% would disappear or decline, leaving fee income represented by 0.9% as the main return. With 0.00x volume relative to TVL, that fee income may not remain stable if activity weakens.

The reward portion represented by 0.0% would disappear or decline, leaving fee income represented by 0.9% as the main return. With 0.00x volume relative to TVL, that fee income may not remain stable if activity weakens.

Risk comes from SOL-XING price divergence, XING's potentially thin external liquidity, and weak activity relative to $41K. The pool's 5/100 score and EXIT verdict indicate that these risks currently outweigh the case for passive fee collection.

Risk comes from SOL-XING price divergence, XING's potentially thin external liquidity, and weak activity relative to $41K. The pool's 5/100 score and EXIT verdict indicate that these risks currently outweigh the case for passive fee collection.

For SOL-XING, consider exiting when the pool's EXIT verdict persists alongside falling TVL, weak volume, or deteriorating XING liquidity. A sustained loss of fee generation is a stronger exit signal than relying on the displayed 0.9% alone.

For SOL-XING, consider exiting when the pool's EXIT verdict persists alongside falling TVL, weak volume, or deteriorating XING liquidity. A sustained loss of fee generation is a stronger exit signal than relying on the displayed 0.9% alone.

A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future volume is uncertain. The relevant comparison is whether cumulative fees at 0.9% can offset price divergence before SOL-XING liquidity or XING demand deteriorates.

A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future volume is uncertain. The relevant comparison is whether cumulative fees at 0.9% can offset price divergence before SOL-XING liquidity or XING demand deteriorates.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights