new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The 17/100 Wealthville Score places SOL-FLOYDAI near the lower end of the raydium-amm set, ranked #699 of 2403 pools. Its Enter score of 15/100, Hold score of 20/100, and Exit score of 80/100 produce a live EXIT verdict: ai_engine=hold is outweighed by scanner=CRITICAL and an unopposed strong EXIT signal. The assessment would improve only with sustained volume relative to liquidity, deeper or more persistent liquidity, and a clearly documented reward schedule; a TVL drain, further yield collapse, or weaker execution would reinforce the exit case.
Computed 2026-08-27 23:20 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$120.89K
Total value locked
$964.85
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.7%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 0.7%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Treat EXIT as the entry filter: enter only with a predefined exit rule, and withdraw if EXIT remains EXIT at the next review or if 0.01x fails to improve while pool liquidity weakens.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.7% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.7% | — | — |
| Volume | $964.85 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $2.41 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 SOL-FLOYDAI pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1 of 55835 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1 of 98856
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-FLOYDAI liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and FLOYDAI into a shared trading pool and receiving a portion of swap fees. Your holdings can shift toward whichever token falls in relative value, and the current return is mainly fee-based rather than subsidy-based.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The quoted return decomposes into 0.7% fee-only APR and 0.0% reward-only APR. 100% of yield comes from trading fees, so there is no current reward component supporting the rate. Reward dependency and any reward-duration schedule are not established; emission changes therefore cannot be treated as a reliable source of future APR.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and range-utilization data are unavailable, so the LP cannot quantify recent divergence exposure or how consistently liquidity has been used. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-FLOYDAI carries asymmetric token-price and liquidity risks: emission decay can remove any future incentive support, while exit timing matters because thinner memecoin liquidity can worsen execution during a selloff. The low trading activity also reduces the fee cushion available to offset price divergence.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established network asset and the more liquid side of this pair, with deeper liquidity across Solana venues than FLOYDAI. SOL price moves change the pool's asset mix and can create impermanent loss when SOL trends sharply relative to FLOYDAI, even if SOL itself remains liquid elsewhere.
tollFLOYDAI Context
FLOYDAI is the memecoin leg and should be treated as the principal idiosyncratic liquidity and valuation risk. Its liquidity depth outside this pool should be verified rather than assumed; a sharp FLOYDAI move or venue exit can materially change the LP's inventory and make rebalancing or withdrawal more costly.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and FLOYDAI into a shared trading pool and receiving a portion of swap fees. Your holdings can shift toward whichever token falls in relative value, and the current return is mainly fee-based rather than subsidy-based.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 2RWdS9xeDXSMgkRZnT2uk4FmnXtykVq6LLYvxPWVUmS3
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- FLOYDAI (J7tYmq2J…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
7%
APR
203%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current return is 0.7%, consisting of 0.7% in fees and 0.0% in rewards. Because 100% comes from fees and no active reward schedule is established, emission decay is not currently the main APR driver but could matter if incentives are introduced later.
The current return is 0.7%, consisting of 0.7% in fees and 0.0% in rewards. Because 100% comes from fees and no active reward schedule is established, emission decay is not currently the main APR driver but could matter if incentives are introduced later.
There is no current reward component beyond 0.0% to remove, so the pool's stated return would remain dependent on 0.7% from trading fees. If incentives are added and later expire, the affected reward portion would fall away and fee income would be the remaining support.
There is no current reward component beyond 0.0% to remove, so the pool's stated return would remain dependent on 0.7% from trading fees. If incentives are added and later expire, the affected reward portion would fall away and fee income would be the remaining support.
Risk is elevated because FLOYDAI can move sharply and may have thinner external liquidity than SOL. With $121K in the pool and 0.01x volume-to-TVL, fee income may be too limited to compensate for price divergence and difficult exits.
Risk is elevated because FLOYDAI can move sharply and may have thinner external liquidity than SOL. With $121K in the pool and 0.01x volume-to-TVL, fee income may be too limited to compensate for price divergence and difficult exits.
For SOL-FLOYDAI, a persistent EXIT verdict, weakening pool liquidity, or declining 0.01x is a concrete review trigger. Exit timing is especially important when FLOYDAI is falling quickly, because withdrawal execution and the pool's token mix can deteriorate together.
For SOL-FLOYDAI, a persistent EXIT verdict, weakening pool liquidity, or declining 0.01x is a concrete review trigger. Exit timing is especially important when FLOYDAI is falling quickly, because withdrawal execution and the pool's token mix can deteriorate together.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee volume may not remain constant. At 0.7%, with 0.7% fee-only APR and 0.0% reward-only APR, break-even depends on sustained trading fees and the future relative prices of SOL and FLOYDAI.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee volume may not remain constant. At 0.7%, with 0.7% fee-only APR and 0.0% reward-only APR, break-even depends on sustained trading fees and the future relative prices of SOL and FLOYDAI.
