SOL-XYOon Raydium CLMMCLMM
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $52.04K
- APR
- 4.9% APR
- 24h Volume
- $2.98K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.25% fee
- Pool address
- 2SmBnUG3…2AbF · observed 2026-09-22
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 46/100 produces Enter 41/100, Hold 52/100, and Exit 29/100 signals, with the live verdict at HOLD and a rank of #970 of 4410 raydium-clmm pools. The ai_engine=hold driver indicates that the pool is being treated as a monitor-and-maintain position rather than a strong new-entry setup: its fee-funded APR is supported by trading fees, but its modest activity relative to liquidity and memecoin exposure limit conviction. The assessment would worsen with a TVL drain, sustained volume loss, or collapse in fee-only APR, and improve only if durable volume growth and deeper liquidity raise fee income without a corresponding increase in price divergence.
Computed 2026-09-22 06:51 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$52.04K
Total value locked
$2.98K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up4.9%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 1.6%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a narrower range only if you can monitor it frequently; set a rebalance or exit trigger when SOL/XYO leaves the active range or when pool volume falls materially below its current 0.11x volume-to-liquidity profile, because fee income may no longer justify the memecoin exposure.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 4.9% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 4.8% | — | — |
| Volume | $2.98K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $7.44 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 3 SOL-XYO pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1016 of 17344 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 5% of all Solana pools
overall rank #5269 of 122041
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-XYO liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and XYO into a shared trading pool so other people can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but price changes can leave you holding more of the weaker asset and may reduce what you would have earned by simply holding both tokens.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield decomposes into 4.8% from trading fees and 0.1% from rewards, with 98% of total yield sustained by fees. Reward dependency is not established, so the fee component is the clearest basis for evaluating ongoing returns. Because this is a MEMECOIN pool, changes in trading activity or liquidity can reduce fee income quickly even without an emissions schedule.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable, and recent tick-in-range history is also unavailable, so current range efficiency and realized divergence loss cannot be quantified from these metrics. The main family-specific risk is memecoin emission decay and exit timing: if attention, volume, or liquidity leaves the market, fee income can contract while inventory becomes harder to unwind near the desired price. A concentrated position also requires monitoring because price movement can move liquidity out of range.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established base asset in this pair and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than XYO. SOL price movements relative to XYO determine which asset accumulates in the position and can make the LP increasingly exposed to the weaker-performing side after sustained divergence.
tollXYO Context
XYO is the thinner-liquidity memecoin-side asset in this pair, so its price discovery and exit liquidity are central risks for the LP. A sharp XYO move against SOL can generate fee income while also changing the position's inventory and increasing the chance that liquidity sits outside the active range.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and XYO into a shared trading pool so other people can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but price changes can leave you holding more of the weaker asset and may reduce what you would have earned by simply holding both tokens.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 2SmBnUG3JXhoJNU6uMwafVLEW55ssaxG1ZmhNedu2AbF
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- XYO (FCZKwHd9…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
1%
APR
0%
APR
2%
APR
500%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The pool's stated reward component is 0.1%, while fee income is 4.8% and 98% of yield comes from fees. If memecoin incentives decay, the remaining APR depends mainly on trading volume and the resulting fee income.
The pool's stated reward component is 0.1%, while fee income is 4.8% and 98% of yield comes from fees. If memecoin incentives decay, the remaining APR depends mainly on trading volume and the resulting fee income.
Because the reward component is 0.1%, expiration would not remove the stated fee component of 4.8%. The practical risk is that lower incentives may reduce liquidity or trading activity, which could reduce fee income and make exits less efficient.
Because the reward component is 0.1%, expiration would not remove the stated fee component of 4.8%. The practical risk is that lower incentives may reduce liquidity or trading activity, which could reduce fee income and make exits less efficient.
Risk is higher than in a pool pairing SOL with a deeper-liquidity, less speculative asset because XYO can experience sharper price moves and thinner exit liquidity. This pool also has $52K of liquidity and a 0.11x volume-to-liquidity profile, so fee income may not fully offset price divergence or range-management risk.
Risk is higher than in a pool pairing SOL with a deeper-liquidity, less speculative asset because XYO can experience sharper price moves and thinner exit liquidity. This pool also has $52K of liquidity and a 0.11x volume-to-liquidity profile, so fee income may not fully offset price divergence or range-management risk.
Consider exiting when XYO liquidity or trading activity deteriorates, when the position moves persistently outside its active range, or when fee-only income no longer compensates for the risk. For SOL-XYO, the current 4.8% should be reassessed if volume falls or TVL drains.
Consider exiting when XYO liquidity or trading activity deteriorates, when the position moves persistently outside its active range, or when fee-only income no longer compensates for the risk. For SOL-XYO, the current 4.8% should be reassessed if volume falls or TVL drains.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable. The theoretical comparison is between fee income of 4.8% and the future divergence between SOL and XYO, with the result also affected by time spent in range and changes in pool volume.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable. The theoretical comparison is between fee income of 4.8% and the future divergence between SOL and XYO, with the result also affected by time spent in range and changes in pool volume.
